Abel T
Department of Medical Sociology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(8):899-908. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90245-8.
The concept of lifestyle bears great potential for research in medical sociology. Yet, weaknesses in current methods have restrained lifestyle research from realizing its full potentials. The present focus is on the links between theoretical conceptions and their empirical application. The paper divides into two parts. The first part provides a discussion of basic theoretical and methodological issues. In particular selected lines of thought from Max Weber are presented and their usefulness in providing a theoretical frame of reference for health lifestyle research is outlined. Next, a theory guided definition of the subject matter is introduced and basic problems in empirical applications of theoretical lifestyle concepts are discussed. In its second part the paper presents findings from comparative lifestyle analyses. Data from the U.S. and West Germany are utilized to explore issues of measurement equivalence and theoretical validity. Factor analyses indicate high conceptual equivalence for new measures of health lifestyle dimensions in both the U.S. and West Germany. Divisive cluster analyses detect three distinct lifestyle groups in both nations. Implications for future lifestyle research are discussed.
生活方式的概念在医学社会学研究中具有巨大潜力。然而,当前方法的缺陷限制了生活方式研究充分发挥其潜力。目前的重点是理论概念与其实证应用之间的联系。本文分为两部分。第一部分讨论基本的理论和方法问题。特别介绍了马克斯·韦伯的某些思想路线,并概述了它们在为健康生活方式研究提供理论参照框架方面的有用性。接下来,引入了一个由理论指导的主题定义,并讨论了理论生活方式概念在实证应用中的基本问题。本文第二部分展示了比较生活方式分析的结果。利用来自美国和西德的数据来探讨测量等效性和理论有效性问题。因子分析表明,美国和西德新的健康生活方式维度测量方法具有高度的概念等效性。分裂聚类分析在两国都检测到了三个不同的生活方式群体。文中讨论了对未来生活方式研究的启示。