• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人(有痴呆和无痴呆)因意外烧伤、走失和药物误服导致的伤害的系统评价

A systematic review of accidental injury from fire, wandering and medication self-administration errors for older adults with and without dementia.

机构信息

McMaster University, School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, 1400 Main St W.- IAHS Bldg. Rm 402, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 1C7.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.02.014. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2010.02.014
PMID:20334937
Abstract

The assessment of risk of injury in the home is important for older adults when considering whether they are able to live independently. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the frequency of injury for persons with dementia and the general older adult population, from three sources: fires/burns, medication self-administration errors and wandering. Relevant articles (n=74) were screened and 16 studies were retained for independent review. The studies, although subject to selection and information bias, showed low proportions of morbidity and mortality from the three sources of injury. Data did not allow direct comparison of morbidity and mortality for persons with dementia and the general older adult population; however, data trends suggested greater event frequencies with medication self-administration and wandering for persons with dementia. Assessment targeting these sources of injury should have less emphasis in the general older adult population compared to persons with dementia.

摘要

对老年人进行家庭伤害风险评估很重要,因为这涉及到他们是否能够独立生活。本系统评价的目的是从火灾/烧伤、药物自我给药错误和走失三个方面确定痴呆症患者和一般老年人的受伤频率。对相关文章(n=74)进行筛选,保留 16 项研究进行独立评估。尽管这些研究受到选择和信息偏倚的影响,但显示出三种伤害源导致发病率和死亡率较低的比例。数据不允许对痴呆症患者和一般老年人的发病率和死亡率进行直接比较;然而,数据趋势表明,药物自我给药和走失的事件频率更高。与痴呆症患者相比,针对这些伤害源的评估应在一般老年人中得到较少的重视。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of accidental injury from fire, wandering and medication self-administration errors for older adults with and without dementia.老年人(有痴呆和无痴呆)因意外烧伤、走失和药物误服导致的伤害的系统评价
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.02.014. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
2
Pharmacotherapies for sleep disturbances in dementia.痴呆症睡眠障碍的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):CD009178. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009178.pub3.
3
Withdrawal or continuation of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine or both, in people with dementia.在痴呆症患者中,停用或继续使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂、美金刚或两者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2):CD009081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009081.pub2.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
6
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.针对儿童和青少年预防意外伤害的校本教育项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.
7
CSF tau and the CSF tau/ABeta ratio for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).脑脊液tau蛋白及脑脊液tau蛋白与β淀粉样蛋白比值在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中用于诊断阿尔茨海默病性痴呆及其他痴呆。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 22;3(3):CD010803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010803.pub2.
8
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving physical and psychological outcomes of fall-related injuries in people with dementia: a narrative systematic review.旨在改善痴呆患者与跌倒相关损伤的身体和心理结局的干预措施的有效性:叙述性系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 20;7(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0697-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of a Specialized Dementia Ward on the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease Patients.专科痴呆病房对阿尔茨海默病患者治疗的影响。
J Pers Med. 2025 Feb 25;15(3):82. doi: 10.3390/jpm15030082.
2
Missing incidents and the risk of harm in persons living with dementia reported to the Swedish police- A nationwide retrospective registry study.向瑞典警方报告的痴呆症患者失踪事件及伤害风险——一项全国性回顾性登记研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05809-9.
3
A study on the falls factors among the older adult with cognitive impairment based on large-sample data.
基于大样本数据的认知障碍老年人跌倒因素研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;12:1376993. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1376993. eCollection 2024.
4
Safety Concerns for Persons with Dementia in Senior Housing: A Qualitative Study with Korean American Caregivers in Los Angeles.老年人住房中痴呆症患者的安全问题:洛杉矶的韩国裔美国家庭照顾者的定性研究。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2023 Nov-Dec;66(8):1108-1119. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2023.2212715. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Association of Dementia Severity and Caregiver Support With Early Discharge From Home Health.痴呆严重程度和照料者支持与家庭医疗提前出院的关联。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2022 Jan-Dec;37:15333175221129384. doi: 10.1177/15333175221129384.
6
Geriatric Domains in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.老年心力衰竭射血分数保留患者的领域。
Cardiol Clin. 2022 Nov;40(4):517-532. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
7
Iatrogenesis in the Context of Residential Dementia Care: A Concept Analysis.居家痴呆症护理背景下的医源性疾病:一项概念分析
Innov Aging. 2022 Apr 21;6(4):igac028. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac028. eCollection 2022.
8
Approach to Management of Wandering in Dementia: Ethical and Legal Issue.痴呆症患者游走行为的管理方法:伦理与法律问题
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Sep;43(5 Suppl):S53-S59. doi: 10.1177/02537176211030979. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
9
Differences in assistive technology installed for people with dementia living at home who have wandering and safety risks.居家痴呆症患者中,存在走失和安全风险的人群所使用的辅助技术的差异。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02546-7.
10
What do we know about strategies to manage dementia-related wandering? A scoping review.我们对管理与痴呆症相关的游走行为的策略了解多少?一项范围综述。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Aug 31;10:615-628. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018.