• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理交接班:文献系统评价。

Nursing handoffs: a systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA.

出版信息

Am J Nurs. 2010 Apr;110(4):24-34; quiz 35-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000370154.79857.09.

DOI:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000370154.79857.09
PMID:20335686
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Handoffs of patient care from one nurse to another are an integral part of nursing practice; but there is abundant evidence that poor communication and variable procedures result in inadequate handoffs. We sought to conduct a systematic review of articles that focused on nursing handoffs, conduct a qualitative review of barriers to and strategies for effective handoffs, and identify features of structured handoffs that have been effective.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of English-language articles, published between January 1, 1987, and August 4, 2008, that focused on nursing handoffs in the United States. The search strategy yielded 2,649 articles. After title review, 460 of these were obtained for further review by trained abstractors.

RESULTS

Ninety-five articles met the inclusion criteria; of these, 55 (58%) were published between January 1, 2006 and August 4, 2008. Content analysis yielded identification of barriers to effective handoffs in eight major categories and strategies for effective handoffs in seven major categories. Twenty articles involved research on nursing handoffs. Quality assessment scores for the research studies ranged from 2 to 12 (possible range, 1 to 16). The majority of the research studies on nursing handoffs (17 studies; 85%) received quality scores at or below 8 and only three achieved scores above 10. Ten (50%) of the studies included measures of handoff effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Despite the well-known negative consequences of inadequate nursing handoffs, very little research has been done to identify best practices. There is remarkable consistency in the anecdotally suggested strategies; but there is a paucity of evidence to support them. We call for high-quality studies of handoff outcomes that focus on systems factors, human performance, and the effectiveness of structured protocols and interventions.

摘要

目的

护士之间的患者交接是护理实践的一个组成部分;但有大量证据表明,沟通不畅和程序多变导致交接不充分。我们试图对专注于护理交接的文章进行系统评价,对有效交接的障碍和策略进行定性评价,并确定结构交接的特征,这些特征是有效的。

方法

我们对 1987 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 8 月 4 日期间在美国发表的专注于护理交接的英文文章进行了系统评价。搜索策略产生了 2649 篇文章。经过标题审查,其中 460 篇由经过培训的摘要作者进一步审查。

结果

95 篇文章符合纳入标准;其中,55 篇(58%)发表于 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 8 月 4 日期间。内容分析确定了有效交接的八个主要障碍类别和七个主要策略类别。20 篇文章涉及护理交接的研究。研究的质量评估分数范围为 2 至 12(可能范围为 1 至 16)。护理交接的大多数研究(17 项研究;85%)的质量评分在 8 或以下,只有 3 项评分超过 10。10 项(50%)研究包括交接有效性的测量。

结论

尽管交接不足会产生众所周知的负面影响,但很少有研究致力于确定最佳实践。在口口相传的建议策略中存在显著的一致性;但支持这些策略的证据很少。我们呼吁对交接结果进行高质量的研究,重点关注系统因素、人为因素以及结构化协议和干预措施的有效性。

相似文献

1
Nursing handoffs: a systematic review of the literature.护理交接班:文献系统评价。
Am J Nurs. 2010 Apr;110(4):24-34; quiz 35-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000370154.79857.09.
2
Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: a systematic review of the literature.住院医师与主治医生的交接班:文献系统综述
Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1775-87. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bf51a6.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
5
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the referral care continuum among complex obstetric patients in the Blantyre District of Malawi: A mixed methods study.马拉维布兰太尔地区复杂产科患者转诊护理连续体的特征分析:一项混合方法研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 24;5(7):e0004939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004939. eCollection 2025.
2
Influencing factors of medication discrepancy in patients with coronary heart disease during hospital-family transition period.冠心病患者在医院-家庭过渡期用药差异的影响因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 16;104(20):e42473. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042473.
3
Use of structured handoff protocols for within-hospital unit transitions: a systematic review from Making Healthcare Safer IV.
结构化交接协议在医院内科室转接中的应用:来自《提高医疗安全IV》的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018385.
4
Handoff Mnemonics Used in Perioperative Handoff Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review.围手术期交接干预研究中使用的交接助记符:一项系统综述。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Nov 26. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007261.
5
Impact of Implementing Electronic Nursing Records on Quality and Safety Indicators in Care.电子护理记录对护理质量和安全指标的影响。
Libyan J Med. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2421625. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2024.2421625. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
6
Comparison of the SBAR method and modified handover model on handover quality and nurse perception in the emergency department: a quasi-experimental study.急诊科SBAR方法与改良交接班模式在交接班质量及护士认知方面的比较:一项准实验研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 25;23(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02266-4.
7
Development of nursing handoff competency scale: a methodological study.护理交接班能力量表的开发:一项方法学研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 24;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01925-w.
8
[Handoffs in the intensive care unit].[重症监护病房中的交接班]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 May;119(4):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01127-x. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
9
Shift-to-shift handoffs in the NICU: lessons learned from a large scale audit.新生儿重症监护病房的交接班:从大规模审计中吸取的经验教训。
J Perinatol. 2023 Dec;43(12):1468-1473. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01724-2. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
10
Nurses' perspectives on shift-to-shift handovers in relation to person-centred nursing home care.护士对以人本位为中心的养老院护理交接班的看法。
Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5035-5043. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1740. Epub 2023 May 4.