• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘患儿环境烟草烟雾暴露的白细胞 DNA 加合物。

White blood cell DNA adducts in a cohort of asthmatic children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670535, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Jan;84(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0529-z. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00420-010-0529-z
PMID:20336464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2922034/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) leads to molecular damage in the form of DNA adducts. While lung cancer risk is higher among African Americans compared to White Americans, a few studies have tested for racial differences in DNA adducts among children exposed to ETS. The purpose of this study was to test whether African American children have higher DNA adducts levels compared to White children adjusted for ETS exposure.

METHODS

Data and biologic specimens were drawn from an existing cohort of 212 asthmatic children. These subjects participated in a 12-month ETS-reduction trial that employed HEPA air cleaners with active filter cartridges and sham filter cartridges. White blood cell (WBC) DNA was analyzed for DNA adducts using (32)P-postlabeling. We assessed ETS exposure using a validated air nicotine dosimeter. We determined the independent relationship between African American race and DNA adduct levels adjusted for ETS exposure and air cleaner use.

RESULTS

The mean age of the subjects was 8.4 years; 55% were African American. There was no difference in DNA adduct levels between African American and White children (11.8 vs. 11.2 adducts per 10(9) nucleotides, p = 0.86), despite slightly higher levels of air nicotine exposure (3.4 vs. 2.2 μg/m(3), p = 0.14). African American children used their air cleaners less often than White children. We found that the best predictor of DNA adduct levels was the duration of air cleaner use (r = -0.133, p = 0.056). This association was independent of cartridge type.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not see differences in adduct levels by race even after accounting for the level of ETS exposure. However, there was a marginal inverse association between air cleaner use and adducts. Additional research is required to understand this phenomenon.

摘要

目的

接触环境烟草烟雾(ETS)会导致 DNA 加合物形式的分子损伤。虽然非裔美国人患肺癌的风险高于白种人,但少数研究已经测试了暴露于 ETS 的儿童中 DNA 加合物的种族差异。本研究旨在测试非裔美国儿童的 DNA 加合物水平是否高于调整 ETS 暴露后白种儿童的水平。

方法

数据和生物标本取自 212 名哮喘儿童的现有队列。这些受试者参加了为期 12 个月的 ETS 减少试验,该试验使用带有活性过滤筒和假过滤筒的高效空气净化器。使用(32)P-后标记法分析白细胞(WBC)DNA 中的 DNA 加合物。我们使用经过验证的空气尼古丁剂量计评估 ETS 暴露情况。我们确定了非裔美国种族与调整 ETS 暴露和空气净化器使用后的 DNA 加合物水平之间的独立关系。

结果

受试者的平均年龄为 8.4 岁,其中 55%是非裔美国人。尽管空气尼古丁暴露水平略高(3.4 与 2.2μg/m(3),p=0.14),但非裔美国儿童与白种儿童的 DNA 加合物水平无差异(11.8 与 11.2 个加合物/10(9)个核苷酸,p=0.86)。非裔美国儿童比白种儿童使用空气净化器的频率更低。我们发现,空气净化器使用时间是 DNA 加合物水平的最佳预测因素(r=-0.133,p=0.056)。这种关联独立于筒式类型。

结论

即使考虑到 ETS 暴露水平,我们也没有看到种族之间加合物水平的差异。然而,空气净化器使用与加合物之间存在边缘负相关。需要进一步研究以了解这种现象。

相似文献

1
White blood cell DNA adducts in a cohort of asthmatic children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.哮喘患儿环境烟草烟雾暴露的白细胞 DNA 加合物。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Jan;84(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0529-z. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
2
The role of air nicotine in explaining racial differences in cotinine among tobacco-exposed children.空气中尼古丁在解释接触烟草儿童中可替宁的种族差异方面的作用。
Chest. 2007 Mar;131(3):856-862. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2123.
3
Racial differences in exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among children.儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的种族差异。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Mar;113(3):362-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7379.
4
Molecular and genetic damage from environmental tobacco smoke in young children.幼儿接触环境烟草烟雾所造成的分子和基因损伤。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 May;8(5):427-31.
5
Biomarkers of environmental tobacco smoke in preschool children and their mothers.学龄前儿童及其母亲体内环境烟草烟雾的生物标志物
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Sep 21;86(18):1398-402. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.18.1398.
6
Relationship between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts, environmental tobacco smoke, and child development in the World Trade Center cohort.世界贸易中心队列中多环芳烃-DNA加合物、环境烟草烟雾与儿童发育之间的关系。
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Oct;115(10):1497-502. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10144.
7
Biomarkers of genotoxicity of air pollution (the AULIS project): bulky DNA adducts in subjects with moderate to low exposures to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their relationship to environmental tobacco smoke and other parameters.空气污染遗传毒性生物标志物(AULIS项目):中度至低度暴露于空气中多环芳烃的受试者体内的大分子DNA加合物及其与环境烟草烟雾和其他参数的关系。
Carcinogenesis. 2001 Sep;22(9):1447-57. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.9.1447.
8
Biomarkers in maternal and newborn blood indicate heightened fetal susceptibility to procarcinogenic DNA damage.母婴血液中的生物标志物表明胎儿对致癌性DNA损伤的易感性增加。
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jul;112(10):1133-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6833.
9
Coke oven workers study: the effect of exposure and GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes on DNA adduct levels in white blood cells and lymphocytes as determined by 32P-postlabelling.炼焦炉工人研究:暴露以及谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1(GSTM1)和N-乙酰基转移酶2(NAT2)基因型对通过32P后标记法测定的白细胞和淋巴细胞中DNA加合物水平的影响。
Mutat Res. 1998 Aug 7;416(1-2):67-84. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(98)00061-8.
10
A randomized trial of air cleaners and a health coach to improve indoor air quality for inner-city children with asthma and secondhand smoke exposure.一项关于空气净化器和健康教练以改善内城区患有哮喘且接触二手烟儿童室内空气质量的随机试验。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug;165(8):741-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.111.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review in Environmental Tobacco Smoke Risk of Female Lung Cancer by Research Type.环境烟草烟雾对女性肺癌风险的荟萃分析和系统评价按研究类型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 27;15(7):1348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071348.
2
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and PAH-related DNA adducts.多环芳烃及与多环芳烃相关的DNA加合物
J Appl Genet. 2017 Aug;58(3):321-330. doi: 10.1007/s13353-016-0380-3. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and child behaviors.环境烟草烟雾暴露与儿童行为
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Dec;29(6):450-7. doi: 10.1097/dbp.0b013e31818d0c21.
2
Lung cancer occurrence in never-smokers: an analysis of 13 cohorts and 22 cancer registry studies.从不吸烟者肺癌发病情况:13 项队列研究和 22 项癌症登记研究的分析。
PLoS Med. 2008 Sep 30;5(9):e185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050185. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
3
Assessment of interactions between PAH exposure and genetic polymorphisms on PAH-DNA adducts in African American, Dominican, and Caucasian mothers and newborns.评估非裔美国人、多米尼加人和白种人母亲及新生儿中多环芳烃暴露与多环芳烃-DNA加合物相关基因多态性之间的相互作用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Feb;17(2):405-13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0695.
4
The role of air nicotine in explaining racial differences in cotinine among tobacco-exposed children.空气中尼古丁在解释接触烟草儿童中可替宁的种族差异方面的作用。
Chest. 2007 Mar;131(3):856-862. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2123.
5
Environmental exposures and exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma.哮喘儿童的环境暴露与呼出一氧化氮
J Pediatr. 2006 Aug;149(2):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.001.
6
Lung cancer death rates in lifelong nonsmokers.终身不吸烟者的肺癌死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 May 17;98(10):691-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj187.
7
Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer.肺癌吸烟相关风险中的种族差异。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):333-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033250.
8
DNA adducts and lung cancer risk: a prospective study.DNA加合物与肺癌风险:一项前瞻性研究。
Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 1;65(17):8042-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3488.
9
DNA damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons measured by benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in mothers and newborns from Northern Manhattan, the World Trade Center Area, Poland, and China.通过苯并[a]芘-DNA加合物测量来自曼哈顿北部、世界贸易中心地区、波兰和中国的母亲及新生儿体内多环芳烃造成的DNA损伤。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Mar;14(3):709-14. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0457.
10
Racial differences in exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among children.儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的种族差异。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Mar;113(3):362-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7379.