Ministry of Health, United Arab Emirates, and Oral Implantology Research Group, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 May;21(5):563-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01890.x. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
To determine the primary stability of the Southern wide diameter (8 mm) implants, Neoss regular diameter (4 mm) implants, and Southern regular diameter (3.75 mm) implants placed in the midline of edentulous mandibles for single-implant overdentures. Variables related to host site and implant characteristics were investigated to determine their influence on the primary stability of the implants.
A total of 36 implants were placed in the midline symphysis of the edentulous mandibles of 36 participants. Their primary stability was then measured using the magnetic Osstell mentor device. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) scores with one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons.
The highest measurement (ISQ) of primary stability was for the Southern 8 mm wide diameter implants (84.8, SD 9.8), followed by the Neoss 4 mm regular diameter (82.3, SD 4.8) implants and the Southern 3.75 mm regular diameter implants (75.3, SD 8.4), respectively. The Southern 3.75 mm regular diameter implants had a significantly lower mean ISQ value than the same system 8 mm wide diameter (P=0.004) and the Neoss 4 mm regular diameter implants (P=0.03). No significant differences were observed between the 8 mm and the 4 mm diameter implants (P>0.05).
Host-site variables such as age, gender, bone volume, and quality do not appear to influence the primary stability of the implants. No clear correlation was established between ISQ values and implant diameter.
确定南方宽直径(8 毫米)种植体、Neoss 常规直径(4 毫米)种植体和南方常规直径(3.75 毫米)种植体在无牙下颌中线部位用于单牙种植覆盖义齿的初始稳定性。研究与宿主部位和种植体特征相关的变量,以确定它们对种植体初始稳定性的影响。
将 36 个种植体放置在 36 名无牙下颌正中联合处。然后使用磁性 Osstell mentor 设备测量它们的初始稳定性。采用方差分析(ANOVA)比较平均种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)评分,并进行多重比较的单因素方差分析。
初始稳定性的最高测量值(ISQ)为南方 8 毫米宽直径种植体(84.8,SD 9.8),其次是 Neoss 4 毫米常规直径种植体(82.3,SD 4.8)和南方 3.75 毫米常规直径种植体(75.3,SD 8.4)。南方 3.75 毫米常规直径种植体的平均 ISQ 值明显低于同系统 8 毫米宽直径种植体(P=0.004)和 Neoss 4 毫米常规直径种植体(P=0.03)。8 毫米和 4 毫米直径种植体之间未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。
宿主部位变量,如年龄、性别、骨量和质量,似乎不会影响种植体的初始稳定性。ISQ 值与种植体直径之间没有明确的相关性。