• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极偏离方法在识别与降低癌症风险兼容的饮食模式方面的实际限制。

Practical limitations to a positive deviance approach for identifying dietary patterns compatible with the reduction of cancer risk.

机构信息

Center for Studies of Sensory Impairment, Aging and Metabolism (CeSSIAM), Guatemala City, Guatemala, Miami, FL 33102-5339, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Aug;23(4):382-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01056.x. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01056.x
PMID:20337848
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The positive deviance (PD) approach seeks to devise and promote health-promoting practices identified within the most successful member of a society. The World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) recommendations indicate the need for specific dietary behaviours, which may be considered impractical. Thus, it is important to demonstrate ways in which these dietary practices have been achieved from concordant individuals. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of constructing healthy eating guides in four international settings.

METHODS

Adult participants from the Netherlands (n = 1052), Scotland (n = 849), Mexico (n = 790) and Guatemala (n = 873) enrolled in an international diet survey project. Participants with inadequate diets and current smokers were excluded from the analysis. Concordance with selected WCRF/AICR individual guideline components related to diet and lifestyle were evaluated. A selection of participants was made towards making a set of 14 rotating menus for a cancer-prevention healthy-eating guide.

RESULTS

Overall concordance with the WCRF/AICR recommendations was low in all four nations and no participants with an ideal behaviour were found. The selection of candidates for constructing 14 daily menus for a single national guide identified 51, 13 and 12 individuals concordant with 11 of 14 WCRF/AICR recommendation components in Guatemala, Scotland and Mexico, respectively, and 24 individuals concordant with eight of 14 WCRF/AICR components in the Netherlands.

CONCLUSIONS

The basis for PD guidance for developing dietary recommendations for cancer prevention was strong across all social classes in Guatemala, marginal for Mexico and Scotland, and effectively impossible for the Netherlands.

摘要

背景

正向偏离(PD)方法旨在设计和推广社会中最成功成员所采用的促进健康的实践。世界癌症研究基金会和美国癌症研究所(WCRF/AICR)的建议表明需要特定的饮食行为,这些行为可能被认为不切实际。因此,重要的是要展示从一致的个体中实现这些饮食实践的方法。本研究旨在评估在四个国际环境中构建健康饮食指南的可行性。

方法

来自荷兰(n = 1052)、苏格兰(n = 849)、墨西哥(n = 790)和危地马拉(n = 873)的成年参与者参加了一项国际饮食调查项目。不符合饮食要求和当前吸烟者的参与者被排除在分析之外。评估了与饮食和生活方式相关的选定 WCRF/AICR 个体指南成分的一致性。选择了一部分参与者来制定一套用于预防癌症的健康饮食指南的 14 份旋转菜单。

结果

在所有四个国家,总体上与 WCRF/AICR 建议的一致性都很低,并且没有发现具有理想行为的参与者。为构建单一国家指南的 14 份日常菜单选择的候选人,在危地马拉、苏格兰和墨西哥,分别有 51、13 和 12 名参与者与 WCRF/AICR 建议的 14 项建议中的 11 项一致,而在荷兰,有 24 名参与者与 WCRF/AICR 的 14 项建议中的 8 项一致。

结论

在危地马拉,所有社会阶层都为制定预防癌症的饮食建议提供了 PD 指导的基础,在墨西哥和苏格兰则是边缘的,而在荷兰则是有效的不可能。

相似文献

1
Practical limitations to a positive deviance approach for identifying dietary patterns compatible with the reduction of cancer risk.积极偏离方法在识别与降低癌症风险兼容的饮食模式方面的实际限制。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Aug;23(4):382-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01056.x. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
2
Concordance with dietary and lifestyle population goals for cancer prevention in Dutch, Scottish, Mexican, and Guatemalan population samples.荷兰、苏格兰、墨西哥和危地马拉人群样本中,饮食和生活方式与癌症预防人群目标的一致性。
Nutrition. 2010 Jan;26(1):40-52. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.04.007.
3
Evaluating concordance with the 1997 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research cancer prevention guidelines: challenges for the research community.评估与1997年世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究学会癌症预防指南的一致性:研究界面临的挑战
Nutr Res Rev. 2008 Dec;21(2):189-206. doi: 10.1017/S095442240813356X.
4
Agreement between dietary and lifestyle guidelines for cancer prevention in population samples of Europeans and Mesoamericans.欧洲人和中美洲人群样本中癌症预防的饮食和生活方式指南之间的一致性。
Nutrition. 2011 Nov-Dec;27(11-12):1146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
5
The positive deviance approach can be used to create culturally appropriate eating guides compatible with reduced cancer risk.
J Nutr. 2009 Apr;139(4):755-62. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.100362. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
6
Concordance with selected population recommendations for cancer prevention among third- and fourth-grade schoolchildren in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala.危地马拉克萨尔特南戈三、四年级学童对选定的癌症预防人群建议的依从性。
Food Nutr Bull. 2010 Jun;31(2):181-92. doi: 10.1177/156482651003100201.
7
Adherence to the AICR cancer prevention recommendations and subsequent morbidity and mortality in the Iowa Women's Health Study cohort.爱荷华妇女健康研究队列中对美国癌症研究学会癌症预防建议的依从性及随后的发病率和死亡率
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Jul;13(7):1114-20.
8
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines and risk of death in Europe: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Nutrition and Cancer cohort study1,4.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所指南与欧洲人群死亡风险的关系:欧洲癌症前瞻性调查营养与癌症队列研究的结果 1,4。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 May;97(5):1107-20. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.049569. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
9
Operationalizing the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations: A Standardized Scoring System.实施 2018 年世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所(WCRF/AICR)癌症预防建议:标准化评分系统。
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 12;11(7):1572. doi: 10.3390/nu11071572.
10
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations and colorectal cancer risk.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究学会的建议与结直肠癌风险
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;85:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer prevention recommendations: awareness in a Mexican public hospital.癌症预防建议:墨西哥公立医院的认知。
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 11;12:e17593. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17593. eCollection 2024.
2
Positive deviance in health and medical research on individual level outcomes - a review of methodology.个体水平结局的健康和医学研究中的积极偏差 - 方法学综述。
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 May;69:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 14.