• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症预防建议:墨西哥公立医院的认知。

Cancer prevention recommendations: awareness in a Mexican public hospital.

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

Instituto de Salud Pública, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Jul 11;12:e17593. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17593. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.17593
PMID:39006033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11246616/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recommendations of both the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) for the prevention of cancer are important public health tools. These recommendations for the prevention of specific cancers are related to body weight maintenance; physical activity; foods and drinks that promote weight gain; plant foods; foods of animal origin; alcoholic beverages; preservation, processing, and preparation of food; food supplements; and breastfeeding.

METHODS

This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study. All patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment in the study. Stratified random sampling was carried out with a convenience sample size of ≥280 participants. The characteristics of the participants were investigated using validated questions. Knowledge about the WCRF/AICR recommendations for the primary prevention of cancer was determined using 14 multiple choice questions validated in this study. Group A included participants who answered that cancer can be prevented and that lifestyle is the main factor related to the onset of cancer; the remaining participants were assigned to Group B. The χ2 test and Mann‒Whitney U test were used to determine differences in the groups. A -value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. A multiple linear regression analysis with gamma response was performed to assess the knowledge score.

RESULTS

A total of 289 participants were included; 168 (58%) participants were in group A, and 121 (42%) participants were in group B. Using a 0 to 14 scale, the median (P25, P75) number of correct answers was 11 (10, 12). There was no evidence of a difference between groups in sex, relationship status, literacy skills, years of education, occupation, monthly income per person, and BMI. Most of the participants reported that they did not consume tobacco ( = 259/289) or alcohol ( = 261/289) in the week prior to completing the survey.

DISCUSSION

Most of the participants (58%) considered cancer preventable and agreed that lifestyle factors were the most important factors in cancer development. The results also showed a high level of public awareness of some evidence-based associations between cancer and lifestyle factors, such as tobacco use. Some confusion among the public on other risk factors was also identified: waist circumference, a variable related to excess weight, was not identified as a risk factor for cancer by most of the participants, but the consumption of foods and beverages high in calories was identified as a risk factor by the majority of participants. Awareness of cancer protective and risk factors may lead to positive behavioral changes and eventually reduce the burden of cancer.

摘要

背景

世界癌症研究基金会(WCRF)和美国癌症研究所(AICR)的癌症预防建议是重要的公共卫生工具。这些针对特定癌症预防的建议与体重维持、身体活动、促进体重增加的食物和饮料、植物性食物、动物性食物、含酒精饮料、食品的保存、加工和制备、食品补充剂以及母乳喂养有关。

方法

本研究为描述性、横断面、回顾性研究。所有患者在入组前均签署了书面知情同意书。采用分层随机抽样,方便样本量≥280 例。采用经过验证的问题调查参与者的特征。使用经过本研究验证的 14 个多项选择题确定参与者对 WCRF/AICR 癌症初级预防建议的了解程度。A 组包括回答癌症可以预防且生活方式是癌症发病主要相关因素的参与者;其余参与者被分配到 B 组。采用 χ2 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较组间差异。P 值≤0.05 为统计学差异有意义。采用伽马响应的多元线性回归分析评估知识得分。

结果

共纳入 289 例参与者;其中 A 组 168 例(58%),B 组 121 例(42%)。采用 0 至 14 分制,正确答案的中位数(P25、P75)为 11(10、12)。两组间性别、婚姻状况、文化程度、受教育年限、职业、人均月收入和 BMI 无差异。大多数参与者报告在完成调查前一周内不吸烟(=259/289)或饮酒(=261/289)。

讨论

大多数(58%)参与者认为癌症可以预防且同意生活方式因素是癌症发展的最重要因素。结果还显示,公众对一些基于证据的癌症与生活方式因素之间的关联有较高的认识,例如吸烟。但公众对其他一些风险因素也存在混淆:大多数参与者并未将腰围(与超重相关的变量)识别为癌症风险因素,但大多数参与者认为高热量食物和饮料是癌症风险因素。对癌症保护和风险因素的认识可能会导致积极的行为改变,最终降低癌症负担。

相似文献

1
Cancer prevention recommendations: awareness in a Mexican public hospital.癌症预防建议:墨西哥公立医院的认知。
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 11;12:e17593. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17593. eCollection 2024.
2
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines and risk of death in Europe: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Nutrition and Cancer cohort study1,4.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所指南与欧洲人群死亡风险的关系:欧洲癌症前瞻性调查营养与癌症队列研究的结果 1,4。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 May;97(5):1107-20. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.049569. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
3
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations and breast cancer risk in the Cancer de Màma (CAMA) study.在“马马癌症(CAMA)研究”中对世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究学会癌症预防建议的遵循情况与乳腺癌风险
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Dec;18(18):3337-48. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000634. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
4
Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study.与世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所癌症预防指南的一致性是否与随后的癌症风险相关?EPIC 研究的结果。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jul;96(1):150-63. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031674. Epub 2012 May 16.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Adherence to the WCRF/AICR Dietary Recommendations for Cancer Prevention and Risk of Cancer in Elderly from Europe and the United States: A Meta-Analysis within the CHANCES Project.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所癌症预防饮食建议与欧美老年人癌症风险:CHANCES项目中的一项荟萃分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jan;26(1):136-144. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0428. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
7
Colorectal cancers survivors' adherence to lifestyle recommendations and cross-sectional associations with health-related quality of life.结直肠癌幸存者对生活方式建议的依从性及其与健康相关生活质量的横断面关联。
Br J Nutr. 2018 Jul;120(2):188-197. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000661. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
How prevalent is a cancer-protective lifestyle? Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations in Switzerland.癌症预防生活方式的流行程度如何?瑞士对 2018 年世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所癌症预防建议的遵循情况。
Br J Nutr. 2023 Sep 14;130(5):904-910. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522003968. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
9
Characteristics of newly diagnosed women with breast cancer: a comparison with the recommendations of the WCRF/AICR Second Report.新诊断乳腺癌女性的特征:与世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所第二次报告建议的比较
Nutr Hosp. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1973-80. doi: 10.3305/nh.2012.27.6.6006.
10
Thrombomodulin and Thrombopoietin, Two Biomarkers of Hemostasis, Are Positively Associated with Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Recommendations for Cancer Prevention in a Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.血栓调节蛋白和血小板生成素是止血的两个生物标志物,与基于人群的横断面研究中对世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所癌症预防建议的坚持呈正相关。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 3;11(9):2067. doi: 10.3390/nu11092067.

本文引用的文献

1
Public awareness of environmental risk factors of cancer and attitude towards its prevention among the Lebanese general population.黎巴嫩一般人群对癌症环境风险因素的认识及其预防态度。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Jul 30;62(2):E466-E478. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1974. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Persistent Poverty and Cancer Mortality Rates: An Analysis of County-Level Poverty Designations.持续贫困与癌症死亡率:基于县级贫困指定的分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Oct;29(10):1949-1954. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0007.
3
Cancer prevention: When knowledge of cancer prevention is not enough.癌症预防:当癌症预防知识不足时。
Cancer. 2020 Oct 15;126(20):4451-4454. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33090. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Knowledge of Cancer Risk Factors, Symptoms, and Barriers to Seeking Medical Help among Omani Adolescents.阿曼青少年对癌症风险因素、症状及寻求医疗帮助的障碍的认知
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):3655-3666. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.12.3655.
5
Advocating for Behavior Change With Education.通过教育倡导行为改变。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2017 Dec 9;12(2):113-116. doi: 10.1177/1559827617745479. eCollection 2018 Mar-Apr.
6
Risk factors associated with gastric cancer in Mexico: education, breakfast and chili.墨西哥胃癌相关危险因素:教育程度、早餐与辣椒。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Jun;110(6):372-379. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5042/2017.
7
Cancer awareness and socio-economic position: results from a population-based study in Denmark.癌症认知与社会经济地位:丹麦一项基于人群研究的结果
BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 9;14:581. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-581.
8
Cancer awareness among adolescents in Britain: a cross-sectional study.英国青少年的癌症意识:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 31;12:580. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-580.
9
Agreement between dietary and lifestyle guidelines for cancer prevention in population samples of Europeans and Mesoamericans.欧洲人和中美洲人群样本中癌症预防的饮食和生活方式指南之间的一致性。
Nutrition. 2011 Nov-Dec;27(11-12):1146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
10
Practical limitations to a positive deviance approach for identifying dietary patterns compatible with the reduction of cancer risk.积极偏离方法在识别与降低癌症风险兼容的饮食模式方面的实际限制。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Aug;23(4):382-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01056.x. Epub 2010 Mar 23.