Suppr超能文献

跟随内心还是理智:关注情绪与信息对年轻人和老年人的决策有不同影响。

Following your heart or your head: focusing on emotions versus information differentially influences the decisions of younger and older adults.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Mar;16(1):87-95. doi: 10.1037/a0018500.

Abstract

Research on aging has indicated that whereas deliberative cognitive processes decline with age, emotional processes are relatively spared. To examine the implications of these divergent trajectories in the context of health care choices, we investigated whether instructional manipulations emphasizing a focus on feelings or details would have differential effects on decision quality among younger and older adults. We presented 60 younger and 60 older adults with health care choices that required them to hold in mind and consider multiple pieces of information. Instructional manipulations in the emotion-focus condition asked participants to focus on their emotional reactions to the options, report their feelings about the options, and then make a choice. In the information-focus condition, participants were instructed to focus on the specific attributes, report the details about the options, and then make a choice. In a control condition, no directives were given. Manipulation checks indicated that the instructions were successful in eliciting different modes of processing. Decision quality data indicate that younger adults performed better in the information-focus than in the control condition whereas older adults performed better in the emotion-focus and control conditions than in the information-focus condition. Findings support and extend extant theorizing on aging and decision making as well as suggest that interventions to improve decision-making quality should take the age of the decision maker into account.

摘要

衰老研究表明,尽管审慎认知过程会随着年龄的增长而下降,但情绪过程相对不受影响。为了在医疗保健选择的背景下研究这些不同轨迹的含义,我们调查了强调关注感受或细节的指导操作是否会对年轻和年长成年人的决策质量产生不同的影响。我们向 60 名年轻成年人和 60 名年长成年人展示了需要他们牢记和考虑多个信息的医疗保健选择。在情感焦点条件下的指导操作要求参与者关注他们对选项的情绪反应,报告他们对选项的感受,然后做出选择。在信息焦点条件下,参与者被指示关注特定属性,报告有关选项的详细信息,然后做出选择。在对照条件下,没有给出指令。操作检查表明,指令成功地引发了不同的处理模式。决策质量数据表明,年轻成年人在信息焦点条件下的表现优于对照条件,而年长成年人在情感焦点和对照条件下的表现优于信息焦点条件。研究结果支持和扩展了关于衰老和决策的现有理论,同时表明,为提高决策质量而进行的干预措施应考虑决策者的年龄。

相似文献

2
Age differences in experiential and deliberative processes in unambiguous and ambiguous decision making.
Psychol Aging. 2015 Sep;30(3):675-87. doi: 10.1037/pag0000038. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
3
Age Differences in the Influence of Induced Negative Emotion on Decision-Making: The Role of Emotion Regulation.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jun 14;74(5):796-805. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx137.
4
Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 5;17(2):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3739.
5
Age Differences in Consumer Decision Making under Option Framing: From the Motivation Perspective.
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 7;7:1736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01736. eCollection 2016.
7
When choice matters: task-dependent memory effects in older adulthood.
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):923-36. doi: 10.1037/a0034520.
9
Choice-supportive source monitoring: do our decisions seem better to us as we age?
Psychol Aging. 2000 Dec;15(4):596-606. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.15.4.596.
10
Framing effects in younger and older adults.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Jul;60(4):P215-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.4.p215.

引用本文的文献

2
Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review.
Adv Geriatr Med Res. 2023;5(1). doi: 10.20900/agmr20230003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Communicating risk: How relevant and irrelevant probabilistic information influences risk perception in medical decision-making.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):678-690. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01053-5. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Susceptibility to default effects does not differ by age.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1175-1187. doi: 10.1037/xge0001317. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Age differences in facial trustworthiness perception are diminished by affective processing.
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Jul 23;19(3):413-422. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00643-5. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Information Avoidance in Consumer Choice: Do Avoidance Tendencies and Motives Vary by Age?
Exp Aging Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):112-129. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2051967. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
7
Age differences in intuitive moral decision-making: Associations with inter-network neural connectivity.
Psychol Aging. 2021 Dec;36(8):902-916. doi: 10.1037/pag0000633. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
This time with feeling: Aging, emotion, motivation, and decision making at work.
Ind Organ Psychol. 2020 Sep;13(3):395-398. doi: 10.1017/iop.2020.65. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
9
Leveraging goals to incentivize healthful behaviors across adulthood.
Psychol Aging. 2021 Feb;36(1):57-68. doi: 10.1037/pag0000428. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Affective Working Memory: An Integrative Psychological Construct.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Jul;14(4):543-559. doi: 10.1177/1745691619837597. Epub 2019 May 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Emotion and working memory: evidence for domain-specific processes for affective maintenance.
Emotion. 2008 Apr;8(2):256-66. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.256.
3
The aging decision maker: cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies.
Psychol Aging. 2007 Dec;22(4):796-810. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.796.
5
The influence of a sense of time on human development.
Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1913-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1127488.
7
Affect, risk, and decision making.
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S35-40. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35.
8
Task complexity and older adults' decision-making competence.
Psychol Aging. 2005 Mar;20(1):71-84. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.71.
10
The role of motivation in the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical memory.
Psychol Sci. 2004 Mar;15(3):208-14. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503011.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验