Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, 135 E. Nittany Ave., State College, PA 16801, USA.
Prev Sci. 2010 Sep;11(3):287-97. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0173-6.
This study examines how aspects of coalition functioning predict a coalition's ability to promote high-quality implementation of evidence-based programs (EBPs). The study involved 62 Communities That Care (CTC) coalitions in Pennsylvania measured annually from 2003 to 2007. Findings indicate that the communities with higher levels of poverty and longer existing coalitions are related to lower support for high-quality EBP implementation. Several aspects of coalition functioning-including higher levels of funding; leadership strength; board efficiency; strong internal and external relationships; and fidelity to the CTC model-significantly predicted support for high-quality EBP implementation. Earlier measurements of coalition functioning (2003-2004 and 2005-2006) predicted EBP implementation (2007) more strongly than concurrent coalition assessments (2007). The discussion focuses on how coalitions and technical assistance providers can improve coalition support for the implementation of EBPs.
本研究考察了联盟运作的各个方面如何预测联盟促进基于证据的计划(EBP)高质量实施的能力。该研究涉及宾夕法尼亚州的 62 个社区关怀(CTC)联盟,从 2003 年到 2007 年每年进行测量。研究结果表明,贫困程度较高和联盟存在时间较长的社区与对高质量 EBP 实施的支持较低有关。联盟运作的几个方面,包括更高的资金水平;领导能力;董事会效率;强大的内部和外部关系;以及对 CTC 模式的忠诚,都显著预测了对高质量 EBP 实施的支持。对联盟运作的早期测量(2003-2004 年和 2005-2006 年)比同期的联盟评估(2007 年)更能预测 EBP 实施(2007 年)。讨论重点关注联盟和技术援助提供者如何提高联盟对 EBP 实施的支持。