• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童人群中的与声音相关的投诉。

Voice-related complaints in the pediatric population.

机构信息

University Hospital of Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium.

出版信息

J Voice. 2011 May;25(3):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.008. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.008
PMID:20359863
Abstract

Subjective evaluation of the voice by the patient is routinely assessed in the adult dysphonic population; this is, however, not the case in the pediatric population. There were three objectives of this study: the first goal was to study the ability of children aged 5-13 years to express themselves about physical, emotional, and sociofunctional aspects of their voice. The second goal was to explore if specific voice-related complaints were expressed by dysphonic children as compared with normophonic children. The third goal was to compare the dysphonic children's voice-related complaints with those of their mothers. The overall objective was to set the grounds for the elaboration of a standardized questionnaire in French concerning subjective evaluation of voice in children. Twenty-five dysphonic children with vocal complaint (15 nodules, one polyp, one microweb, eight unspecified) and 55 normophonic children aged 5-13 years were interviewed. The interviews were semistructured based on a canvas of voice-related questions. The dysphonic children's mothers were interviewed with the mean of a written questionnaire and were invited to discuss their answers orally with the examiner. The results were analyzed qualitatively and statistically. A Chi-square test and the Fisher's test were used to analyze the differences between the complaints expressed by the dysphonic and the normophonic children, and a binomial test was used to compare the children's answers with their mothers' answers. The qualitative analysis of the interviews suggests that children are capable of reflecting over their own voice and of giving autonomous information about different aspects of their voice. It also appeared that voice is a complex phenomenon and that it needs to be clearly and cautiously defined to the children. We identified 27 different complaints related to the voice, out of which 17 were significantly more expressed by dysphonic than by normophonic children (P<0.05). Three of the 27 identified complaints show significant discordances between the mothers and the dysphonic children. The results suggest that children are capable of making a subjective and autonomous evaluation of their voice and that dysphonic children experience significantly more voice-related discomfort than nondysphonic children. The complaints expressed by the dysphonic children and their mothers are not all in concordance. The main conclusion is that a standardized subjective evaluation of the voice, not only by the parents but also by the child him/herself, would be relevant in the assessment of pediatric dysphonia.

摘要

患者对声音的主观评估在成年发音障碍人群中通常会进行评估;然而,在儿科人群中并非如此。本研究有三个目的:第一个目标是研究 5-13 岁儿童表达自己声音的身体、情感和社会功能方面的能力。第二个目标是探索发音障碍儿童是否会表达特定的与声音相关的抱怨,与发音正常的儿童相比。第三个目标是比较发音障碍儿童与他们母亲的声音相关抱怨。总体目标是为制定法语儿童声音主观评估的标准化问卷奠定基础。对 25 名有声音抱怨的发音障碍儿童(15 名声带小结,1 名息肉,1 名微小结,8 名未特指)和 55 名 5-13 岁的发音正常儿童进行了访谈。访谈基于一系列与声音相关的问题进行半结构化。对发音障碍儿童的母亲进行了书面问卷访谈,并邀请她们与检查者口头讨论答案。结果进行了定性和统计学分析。使用卡方检验和 Fisher 检验分析发音障碍儿童和发音正常儿童表达的抱怨之间的差异,使用二项式检验比较儿童和母亲的答案。访谈的定性分析表明,儿童能够反思自己的声音,并能自主提供有关声音不同方面的信息。研究还表明,声音是一个复杂的现象,需要向儿童清楚且谨慎地定义。我们确定了 27 种不同的与声音相关的抱怨,其中 17 种在发音障碍儿童中比在发音正常儿童中表达得更明显(P<0.05)。27 种确定的抱怨中有 3 种在母亲和发音障碍儿童之间存在显著差异。结果表明,儿童能够对自己的声音进行主观和自主评估,发音障碍儿童比发音正常儿童经历更多与声音相关的不适。发音障碍儿童及其母亲表达的抱怨并非完全一致。主要结论是,对儿童声音的主观评估(不仅是父母,还有儿童自己)标准化将与儿科发音障碍的评估相关。

相似文献

1
Voice-related complaints in the pediatric population.儿童人群中的与声音相关的投诉。
J Voice. 2011 May;25(3):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.008. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
2
Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.运用声学嗓音质量指数对儿童嗓音障碍进行客观评估。
J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):672.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 May 25.
3
Validation and standardization of the Pediatric Voice Symptom Questionnaire: a double-form questionnaire for dysphonic children and their parents.《儿童嗓音症状问卷》的验证和标准化:一种用于发音障碍儿童及其家长的双份问卷。
J Voice. 2012 Jul;26(4):e129-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
4
Is there an effect of dysphonic teachers' voices on children's processing of spoken language?发声困难教师的声音对儿童口语处理有影响吗?
J Voice. 2005 Mar;19(1):47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.007.
5
Children's Subjective Ratings and Opinions of Typical and Dysphonic Voice After Performing a Language Comprehension Task in Background Noise.儿童在背景噪音中执行语言理解任务后对典型嗓音和嗓音障碍的主观评分及看法。
J Voice. 2015 Sep;29(5):624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
6
Voice quality in relation to voice complaints and vocal fold condition during the screening of female student teachers.女声质量与女性实习教师嗓音投诉和声带状况的关系筛查。
J Voice. 2011 Jul;25(4):462-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
7
Attitudes of children with dysphonia.发声障碍儿童的态度。
J Voice. 2008 Mar;22(2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.09.005. Epub 2007 May 18.
8
Vocal impact of a prolonged reading task in dysphonic versus normophonic female teachers.患有发音障碍的女性教师和发音正常的女性教师在长时间阅读任务中的发音影响。
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):820.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.06.002.
9
Voice-related quality of life in the pediatric population: validation of the Brazilian version of the Pediatric Voice-Related Quality-of Life survey.儿科人群中与嗓音相关的生活质量:巴西版儿科嗓音相关生活质量调查问卷的验证
Codas. 2014 Jan-Feb;26(1):87-95.
10
Parents' Evaluations of Their Children's Dysphonia: The Mamas and the Papas.父母对其子女嗓音障碍的评估:妈妈们和爸爸们。
J Voice. 2015 Jul;29(4):469-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.021. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic Status, Voice Disorder Risk, and Voice-Related Handicap Across Childhood.儿童期的社会经济地位、嗓音障碍风险及嗓音相关障碍
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.2633.
2
Prevalence of Voice Disorders and Correlation Between Hypernasality and Acoustic Characteristics in Children With Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患儿嗓音障碍患病率及鼻音过重与声学特征的相关性
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 May 22;10(3):e70165. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70165. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The Pediatric Vocal Mechanism: Structure and Function.
小儿发声机制:结构与功能
J Voice. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.025.
4
Characterizing Dysphonia After Pediatric Open Airway Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童开放性气道重建术后嗓音障碍的特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241266570. doi: 10.1177/19160216241266570.
5
Longitudinal Evaluation of Cepstral Peak Prominence in Children.儿童谐波峰值突出度的纵向评估
J Voice. 2024 May 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.04.019.
6
Voice Onset Time in Children With and Without Vocal Fold Nodules.声带小结患儿与声带正常儿童的起始发声时间比较。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 May 9;66(5):1467-1478. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00463. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Assessment of Life Quality in Children with Dysphonia Using Modified Pediatric Voice-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire in Serbia.在塞尔维亚使用改良的儿童嗓音相关生活质量问卷评估嗓音障碍儿童的生活质量。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;10(1):125. doi: 10.3390/children10010125.
8
Reducing the GAP between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part A: perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality, acoustic vocal signal analysis and voice self-assessment.缩小科学与临床之间的差距:学术和专业实践的经验教训 - 第 A 部分:声音质量的知觉 - 听觉判断、声学嗓音信号分析和嗓音自我评估。
Codas. 2022 Aug 1;34(5):e20210240. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021240pt. eCollection 2022.
9
Prevalence and Determinants of Hoarseness in School-Aged Children.学龄儿童声音嘶哑的患病率及相关决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 30;19(9):5468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095468.
10
Cognitive Mechanisms in Pediatric Voice Therapy - An Initial Examination.儿童语音治疗中的认知机制——初步研究
J Voice. 2024 Mar;38(2):538.e11-538.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Nov 5.