Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-3005, USA.
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Mar 24;2(24):24ra21. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000799.
New strains of H1N1 influenza virus have emerged episodically over the last century to cause human pandemics, notably in 1918 and recently in 2009. Pandemic viruses typically evolve into seasonal forms that develop resistance to antibody neutralization, and cross-protection between strains separated by more than 3 years is uncommon. Here, we define the structural basis for cross-neutralization between two temporally distant pandemic influenza viruses--from 1918 and 2009. Vaccination of mice with the 1918 strain protected against subsequent lethal infection by 2009 virus. Both were resistant to antibodies directed against a seasonal influenza, A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (1999 NC), which was insensitive to antisera to the pandemic strains. Pandemic strain-neutralizing antibodies were directed against a subregion of the hemagglutinin (HA) receptor binding domain that is highly conserved between the 1918 and the 2009 viruses. In seasonal strains, this region undergoes amino acid diversification but is shielded from antibody neutralization by two highly conserved glycosylation sites absent in the pandemic strains. Pandemic HA trimers modified by glycosylation at these positions were resistant to neutralizing antibodies to wild-type HA. Yet, antisera generated against the glycosylated HA mutant neutralized it, suggesting that the focus of the immune response can be selectively changed with this modification. Collectively, these findings define critical determinants of H1N1 viral evolution and have implications for vaccine design. Immunization directed to conserved receptor binding domain subregions of pandemic viruses could potentially protect against similar future pandemic viruses, and vaccination with glycosylated 2009 pandemic virus may limit its further spread and transformation into a seasonal influenza.
过去一个世纪中,新的 H1N1 流感病毒不断出现,导致人类大流行,尤其是在 1918 年和最近的 2009 年。大流行病毒通常会进化成对抗体中和具有耐药性的季节性形式,而且超过 3 年的不同毒株之间的交叉保护并不常见。在这里,我们定义了两种时间上相隔较远的大流行流感病毒——1918 年和 2009 年之间的交叉中和的结构基础。用 1918 年的毒株给小鼠接种疫苗,可以预防随后由 2009 年病毒引起的致命感染。两种病毒都对针对季节性流感 A/New Caledonia/20/1999(1999 NC)的抗体具有耐药性,而这种抗体对大流行株的血清不敏感。大流行株中和抗体针对血凝素(HA)受体结合域的一个亚区,该亚区在 1918 年和 2009 年的病毒之间高度保守。在季节性株中,该区域的氨基酸发生多样化,但由于两个高度保守的糖基化位点缺失,该区域免受抗体中和。在这些位置发生糖基化修饰的大流行 HA 三聚体对野生型 HA 的中和抗体具有耐药性。然而,针对糖基化 HA 突变体产生的抗血清可以中和它,这表明可以通过这种修饰选择性地改变免疫反应的焦点。总的来说,这些发现定义了 H1N1 病毒进化的关键决定因素,并对疫苗设计具有重要意义。针对大流行病毒保守受体结合域亚区的免疫接种可能潜在地预防未来类似的大流行病毒,并且用糖基化的 2009 年大流行病毒进行免疫接种可能会限制其进一步传播和转化为季节性流感。