• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[儿童期创伤的回顾性评估:工具综述]

[Retrospective assessment of childhood trauma: review of the instruments].

作者信息

Pietrini Francesco, Lelli Lorenzo, Verardi Alice, Silvestri Cristina, Faravelli Carlo

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche e Psichiatriche, Università di Firenze.

出版信息

Riv Psichiatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;45(1):7-16.

PMID:20380237
Abstract

AIM

Childhood trauma has a crucial and proved role for the development of psychopathology during adulthood. The results of a systematic review on the instruments for the retrospective assessment of childhood trauma are reported in order to compare their reliability, validity, comprehensiveness and use.

METHODS

A literature search on this argument was conducted on Medline electronic archives and by canvassing English-language and other European languages publications. Eligible instruments were restricted to the ones with: available publications, retrospective assessment on adult population, independence from specific diagnostic categories, sufficient data regarding the main features.

RESULTS

Of the 19 eligible instruments, the Familial Experiences Interview (FEI) and the Early Trauma Inventory Self Report (ETI-SR) evaluate the highest number of "trauma areas" considered in this review. The reliability and validity data provided by Authors, when available, are reported to be good to excellent. The four most used instruments in the clinical and epidemiological practice appear to be the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA.Q) and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).

DISCUSSION

Our review on the currently available instruments has pointed out some weaknesses that narrow their actual use and evaluation capability. Such issues should be taken in consideration and further discussed especially considering the increasing consent of research on the role of childhood trauma for the development of adult psychopathology.

摘要

目的

童年创伤对成年期精神病理学的发展具有关键且已得到证实的作用。本文报告了一项关于童年创伤回顾性评估工具的系统评价结果,以比较其可靠性、有效性、全面性及实用性。

方法

通过检索Medline电子数据库,并查阅英文及其他欧洲语言的出版物,对该主题进行文献检索。符合条件的工具仅限于具备以下特征的:有公开出版物、针对成年人群进行回顾性评估、独立于特定诊断类别、具备有关主要特征的充分数据。

结果

在19种符合条件的工具中,家庭经历访谈(FEI)和早期创伤量表自评版(ETI-SR)评估了本综述中所考虑的最多数量的“创伤领域”。作者提供的可靠性和有效性数据(如有)据报告为良好至优秀。临床和流行病学实践中最常用的四种工具似乎是父母教养方式问卷(PBI)、成人依恋访谈(AAI)、童年期照料与虐待经历问卷(CECA.Q)和儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)。

讨论

我们对现有工具的综述指出了一些弱点,这些弱点限制了它们的实际应用和评估能力。应考虑并进一步讨论这些问题,尤其是考虑到关于童年创伤在成年期精神病理学发展中的作用的研究越来越受到认可。

相似文献

1
[Retrospective assessment of childhood trauma: review of the instruments].[儿童期创伤的回顾性评估:工具综述]
Riv Psichiatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;45(1):7-16.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
9
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Trauma and Distress Scale, TADS, in an adult community sample in Finland.芬兰成年社区样本中创伤与痛苦量表(TADS)的心理测量特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2016 Mar 30;7:30062. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.30062. eCollection 2016.