• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后入院血糖变异性、血糖和糖化血红蛋白对主要不良心脏事件的影响。

Impact of admission glycemic variability, glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin on major adverse cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1026-32. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0925. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

DOI:10.2337/dc12-0925
PMID:23349547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3609497/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dysglycemia is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Whether admission glycemic variability (GV) has important value in prognosis of AMI patients is still unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the prognostic value of admission GV, glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) in AMI patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We measured blood glucose, HbA(1c), and GV on admission in 222 consecutive patients with diagnosed AMI. GV, indicated as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), was determined by a continuous glucose monitoring system. MAGE was categorized as ≥3.9 or <3.9 mmol/L, admission glucose as ≥8.61 or <8.61 mmol/L, and HbA(1c) as ≥6.5 or <6.5%. Participants were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The relationship of admission MAGE, glucose, and HbA(1c) to the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of AMI patients was analyzed.

RESULTS

In 222 enrolled patients with AMI, the rate of MACE by MAGE category (<3.9 or ≥3.9 mmol/L) was 8.4 and 24.1%, respectively (P = 0.001), by admission glucose category (<8.61 or ≥8.61 mmol/L) was 10.1 and 21.6%, respectively (P = 0.020), and by HbA(1c) category (<6.5 vs. ≥6.5%) was 10.7 versus 18.7%, respectively (P = 0.091). In multivariate analysis, high MAGE level was significantly associated with incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 2.419 [95% CI 1.273-9.100]; P = 0.017) even after adjusting for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score, but admission glucose and HbA(1c) was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated admission GV appears more important than admission glucose and prior long-term abnormal glycometabolic status in predicting 1-year MACE in patients with AMI.

摘要

目的

血糖异常与急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的预后不良相关。入院时血糖变异性(GV)对 AMI 患者的预后是否具有重要价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 AMI 患者入院时的 GV、血糖和糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))的预后价值。

研究设计和方法

我们连续测量了 222 例确诊 AMI 患者入院时的血糖、HbA(1c)和 GV。通过连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)测定 GV,以平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE)表示。MAGE 分为≥3.9 或<3.9mmol/L,入院时血糖分为≥8.61 或<8.61mmol/L,HbA(1c)分为≥6.5 或<6.5%。对患者进行前瞻性随访 12 个月。分析入院时 MAGE、血糖和 HbA(1c)与 AMI 患者主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的关系。

结果

在 222 例 AMI 患者中,MAGE 分类(<3.9 或≥3.9mmol/L)的 MACE 发生率分别为 8.4%和 24.1%(P=0.001),入院时血糖分类(<8.61 或≥8.61mmol/L)的 MACE 发生率分别为 10.1%和 21.6%(P=0.020),HbA(1c)分类(<6.5%或≥6.5%)的 MACE 发生率分别为 10.7%和 18.7%(P=0.091)。多因素分析显示,高 MAGE 水平与 MACE 的发生显著相关(危险比 2.419[95%CI 1.273-9.100];P=0.017),即使在校正全球急性冠状动脉事件注册风险评分后也是如此,但入院时血糖和 HbA(1c)则不然。

结论

与入院时血糖和既往长期异常糖代谢状态相比,升高的入院 GV 似乎更能预测 AMI 患者 1 年时的 MACE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a119/3609497/d1007788816a/1026fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a119/3609497/1e4c21600f0c/1026fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a119/3609497/d1007788816a/1026fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a119/3609497/1e4c21600f0c/1026fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a119/3609497/d1007788816a/1026fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of admission glycemic variability, glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin on major adverse cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后入院血糖变异性、血糖和糖化血红蛋白对主要不良心脏事件的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1026-32. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0925. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
2
Comparison of admission glycemic variability and glycosylated hemoglobin in predicting major adverse cardiac events among type 2 diabetes patients with heart failure following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后合并心力衰竭的2型糖尿病患者中,入院血糖变异性与糖化血红蛋白对主要不良心脏事件预测价值的比较
J Transl Int Med. 2024 May 21;12(2):188-196. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2024-0006. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Prognostic value of early in-hospital glycemic excursion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死患者住院早期血糖波动的预后价值。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Feb 11;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-33.
4
Comparison of glycemic variability and glycated hemoglobin as risk factors of coronary artery disease in patients with undiagnosed diabetes.比较血糖变异性和糖化血红蛋白作为未诊断糖尿病患者冠心病的危险因素。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Jan;125(1):38-43.
5
Prognostic value of admission plasma glucose and HbA in acute myocardial infarction.入院时血浆葡萄糖和糖化血红蛋白在急性心肌梗死中的预后价值。
Diabet Med. 2004 Apr;21(4):305-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01112.x.
6
Comparison of in-hospital glycemic variability and admission blood glucose in predicting short-term outcomes in non-diabetes patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.非糖尿病ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,院内血糖变异性与入院血糖对短期预后预测价值的比较
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017 Mar 21;9:20. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0217-1. eCollection 2017.
7
Prognostic value of admission glycosylated hemoglobin and glucose in nondiabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非糖尿病 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者入院时糖化血红蛋白和血糖的预后价值。
Circulation. 2011 Aug 9;124(6):704-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.985911. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
8
The value of admission HbA(1c) level in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征糖尿病患者入院时 HbA(1c)水平的价值。
Clin Cardiol. 2011 Aug;34(8):507-12. doi: 10.1002/clc.20915. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
9
Importance of measuring glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with myocardial infarction and known diabetes mellitus.测量已知患有糖尿病的心肌梗死患者的糖化血红蛋白的重要性。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1090-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
10
Haemoglobin A(1c) , acute hyperglycaemia and short-term prognosis in patients without diabetes following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.糖化血红蛋白 A(1c) 、急性高血糖与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者无糖尿病时的短期预后。
Diabet Med. 2012 Dec;29(12):1493-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03641.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between glycemic variability and mortality in critically ill patients with heart failure.重症心力衰竭患者血糖变异性与死亡率之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 23;15(1):31021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16212-0.
2
Hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in acute myocardial infarction: the lesser-known aspects of glycemic control.急性心肌梗死中的低血糖与血糖变异性:血糖控制中鲜为人知的方面
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Jul 30;24(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02862-x.
3
The clinical importance of measuring glycaemic variability: Utilising new metrics to optimise glycaemic control.

本文引用的文献

1
Metabolic complications associated with use of diuretics.与利尿剂使用相关的代谢并发症。
Semin Nephrol. 2011 Nov;31(6):542-52. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.09.009.
2
Prognostic value of admission glycosylated hemoglobin and glucose in nondiabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非糖尿病 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者入院时糖化血红蛋白和血糖的预后价值。
Circulation. 2011 Aug 9;124(6):704-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.985911. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
3
A decrease in glucose variability does not reduce cardiovascular event rates in type 2 diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction: a reanalysis of the HEART2D study.
测量血糖变异性的临床重要性:利用新指标优化血糖控制。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Dec;26 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):3-16. doi: 10.1111/dom.16098. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
4
Associations between time in range and insulin secretory capacity in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.日本 2 型糖尿病患者达标时间与胰岛素分泌能力的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 5;14(1):12910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63678-5.
5
Continuous glucose monitoring for the routine care of type 2 diabetes mellitus.实时血糖监测用于 2 型糖尿病的常规护理。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024 Jul;20(7):426-440. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-00973-1. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
Effect of 24 h glucose fluctuations on 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an analysis from the MIMIC-III database.24小时血糖波动对急性心肌梗死患者30天和1年死亡率的影响:来自MIMIC-III数据库的分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 20;11:1371606. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1371606. eCollection 2024.
7
Research progress on the association between glycemic variability index derived from CGM and cardiovascular disease complications.基于 CGMS 的血糖波动指数与心血管疾病并发症相关性的研究进展。
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Jun;61(6):679-692. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02241-0. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
8
Association between perioperative glucose profiles assessed by the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system and prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): protocol for a cohort study.连续血糖监测(CGM)系统评估的围手术期血糖谱与ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者预后的关系:一项队列研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 5;14(2):e079659. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079659.
9
Baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and glycosylated hemoglobinA1c predict adverse outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.基线高敏C反应蛋白和糖化血红蛋白A1c可预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的不良结局。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 16;10(1):e23900. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23900. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
10
Mitigating iftar-related glycemic excursions in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes on MiniMed™ 780G advanced hybrid closed loop system: a randomized clinical trial for adjunctive oral vildagliptin therapy during Ramadan fasting.在使用美敦力™780G高级混合闭环系统的1型糖尿病青少年和年轻成人中减轻与开斋饭相关的血糖波动:斋月禁食期间辅助口服维格列汀治疗的一项随机临床试验
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Dec 7;15(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01232-5.
急性心肌梗死后,降低血糖变异性并不能降低 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管事件发生率:HEART2D 研究的再分析。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):855-7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1684.
4
Association of glycemic variability and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.血糖变异性与 2 型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的发生和严重程度的关系。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011 Feb 25;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-10-19.
5
Establishment of normal reference ranges for glycemic variability in Chinese subjects using continuous glucose monitoring.应用连续血糖监测建立中国人群血糖波动的正常参考范围。
Med Sci Monit. 2011 Jan;17(1):CR9-13. doi: 10.12659/msm.881318.
6
For debate. Glucose variability and diabetes complication risk: we need to know the answer.争议中。血糖变异性与糖尿病并发症风险:我们需要知道答案。
Diabet Med. 2010 Aug;27(8):868-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02929.x.
7
Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults.糖化血红蛋白、糖尿病与非糖尿病成年人的心血管风险。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):800-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908359.
8
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
9
Postchallenge plasma glucose excursions, carotid intima-media thickness, and risk factors for atherosclerosis in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes.中国 2 型糖尿病患者的餐后血糖波动、颈动脉内膜中层厚度与动脉粥样硬化危险因素。
Atherosclerosis. 2010 May;210(1):302-6. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.11.015. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
10
Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it?血糖变异性:糖尿病血糖异常的第三个组成部分。它重要吗?如何测量它?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Nov;2(6):1094-100. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200618.