Suppr超能文献

加利福尼亚社区干预评估。

An evaluation of the California community intervention.

机构信息

California Department of Public Health, California Tobacco Control Program, MS 7206, P.O. Box 997377, Sacramento, CA 95899-7377, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i30-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031252.

Abstract

AIM

We conducted this study to determine key community-level factors associated with higher tobacco control programme performance.

METHODS

A combination of surveys, administrative and fiscal data were collected to measure local county-level health department performance over a 7-year period. Longitudinal analyses were performed using generalised estimating equations to examine whether counties that exerted higher effort were successful in creating more tobacco retail licensing (TRL) and secondhand smoke policies. Several social, political and contextual factors were examined as confounders.

RESULTS

Local county health departments (CHDs) that demonstrated high effort on their work plans increased the proportion of residents covered by TRL policies (7.2%; 95% CI -1.7 to 16.1%) compared to CHDs with lower levels of effort. Having legislators who voted in favour of tobacco control bills was found to significantly increase the passage of local TRL policies. CHDs demonstrating higher efforts also increased the proportion of residents covered by secondhand smoke policies (9.2%; 95% CI -3.5 to 21.9%).

CONCLUSION

There was strong evidence that higher county-level efforts predicted an increasing number of local tobacco control policies. Evaluations using integrated designs are recommended as effective strategies to provide a more accurate assessment of how well community-level interventions catalyse community-wide change.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与更高的烟草控制规划绩效相关的关键社区层面因素。

方法

采用问卷调查、行政和财政数据相结合的方法,在 7 年期间内对地方县级卫生部门的绩效进行测量。采用广义估计方程进行纵向分析,以检验在创造更多烟草零售许可证(TRL)和二手烟政策方面投入更多努力的县是否成功。研究还考察了几个社会、政治和背景因素作为混杂因素。

结果

与努力程度较低的县级卫生部门相比,在工作计划上表现出高度努力的县级卫生部门增加了 TRL 政策覆盖的居民比例(7.2%;95%置信区间-1.7 至 16.1%)。发现立法者投票赞成烟草控制法案显著增加了当地 TRL 政策的通过。表现出更高努力的县级卫生部门也增加了二手烟政策覆盖的居民比例(9.2%;95%置信区间-3.5 至 21.9%)。

结论

有强有力的证据表明,县级努力程度越高,预示着当地烟草控制政策的数量就会越多。建议采用综合设计进行评估,作为有效策略,更准确地评估社区层面干预措施如何促进社区范围内的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6805/2976494/d24f117937ea/tc031252.f1.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the California community intervention.
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i30-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031252.
3
Policy-driven tobacco control.
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i16-20. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030718.
4
Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies.
J Community Health. 2011 Aug;36(4):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6.
5
Overview of systematic reviews on the health-related effects of government tobacco control policies.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 5;15:744. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2041-6.
7
Towards stronger tobacco control policies to curb the smoking epidemic in Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Jul;26(7):1561-1569. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03385-9. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
Results from an evaluation of tobacco control policies at the 2010 Shanghai World Expo.
Tob Control. 2013 Sep;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii21-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050816. Epub 2013 May 25.
9
Rating the effectiveness of local tobacco policies for reducing youth smoking.
J Prim Prev. 2014 Apr;35(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0336-x.
10
Tobacco-control policies in tobacco-growing states: where tobacco was king.
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):319-58. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12124.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating local policy adoption campaigns in California: Tobacco Retail License (TRL) adoption.
J Community Health. 2014 Jun;39(3):584-91. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9803-9.
2
A Smoke-Free Paso del Norte: impact over 10 years on smoking prevalence using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102(5):899-908. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300346. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
3
A short online community readiness survey for smoke-free policy.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Dec;14(12):1494-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts012. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
4
Tobacco industry denormalisation as a tobacco control intervention: a review.
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):162-70. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050200.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of the California tobacco control program on personal health care expenditures.
PLoS Med. 2008 Aug 26;5(8):e178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050178.
2
Tobacco control success versus demographic destiny: examining the causes of the low smoking prevalence in California.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):268-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.112318. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
3
Examining trends in quantity smoked.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Dec;9(12):1287-96. doi: 10.1080/14622200701705001.
4
Development of a social will for tobacco control index.
Am J Health Behav. 2006 Jan-Feb;30(1):15-26. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2006.30.1.15.
5
Association of the California tobacco control program with declines in lung cancer incidence.
Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Sep;15(7):689-95. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036187.13805.30.
9
Trends in adult cigarette smoking in California compared with the rest of the United States, 1978-1994.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Mar;90(3):372-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.3.372.
10
To boldly go...
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jan;90(1):25-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.1.25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验