Center for Evaluation and Research, University of California, Davis, 1616 DaVinci Ct, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Sep;8(5):A111. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
Since 2000, local jurisdictions in California have enacted hundreds of policies and ordinances in an effort to protect their citizens from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke. We evaluated strategies used by state-funded local tobacco control programs to enact local smoke-free policies involving outdoor recreational spaces.
The Tobacco Control Evaluation Center analyzed 23 final evaluation reports that discussed adopting local smoke-free policies in outdoor recreational facilities in California. These reports were submitted for the 2004 through 2007 funding period by local tobacco control organizations to the California Department of Public Health, Tobacco Control Program. We used a comparative technique whereby we coded passages and compared them by locale and case, focusing on strategies that led to the enactment of smoke-free policies.
Our analysis found the following 6 strategies to be the most effective: 1) having a "champion" who helps to carry an objective forward, 2) tapping into a pool of potential youth volunteers, 3) collecting and using local data as a persuasive tool, 4) educating the community in smoke-free policy efforts, 5) working strategically in the local political climate, and 6) framing the policy appropriately.
These strategies proved effective regardless of whether policies were voluntary, administrative, or legislative. Successful policy enactment required a strong foundation of agency funding and an experienced and committed staff. These results should be relevant to other tobacco control organizations that are attempting to secure local smoke-free policy.
自 2000 年以来,加利福尼亚州的地方司法管辖区已颁布了数百项政策和条例,努力保护其公民免受二手烟的有害影响。我们评估了由州资助的地方烟草控制计划所采用的策略,以制定涉及户外休闲场所的当地无烟政策。
烟草控制评估中心分析了 23 份最终评估报告,这些报告讨论了在加利福尼亚州的户外休闲设施中采用当地无烟政策。这些报告是由地方烟草控制组织在 2004 年至 2007 年的供资期间提交给加利福尼亚州公共卫生部烟草控制计划的。我们使用了一种比较技术,即我们对段落进行编码并按地点和案例进行比较,重点关注导致无烟政策颁布的策略。
我们的分析发现以下 6 种策略最为有效:1)有一位“拥护者”,帮助推动一个目标;2)挖掘潜在的青年志愿者资源;3)收集和使用当地数据作为有说服力的工具;4)在无烟政策方面教育社区;5)在当地政治氛围中进行战略性工作;6)适当制定政策。
无论政策是自愿的、行政的还是立法的,这些策略都被证明是有效的。成功的政策制定需要强大的机构资金基础和经验丰富、敬业的员工。这些结果应该与其他试图确保当地无烟政策的烟草控制组织相关。