Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Sairaalakatu 1, Helsinki, Finland.
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R60. doi: 10.1186/cc8957. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
High daily intensive care unit (ICU) costs are associated with the use of mechanical ventilation (MV) to treat acute respiratory failure (ARF), and assessment of quality of life (QOL) after critical illness and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.
Nationwide, prospective multicentre observational study in 25 Finnish ICUs. During an eight-week study period 958 consecutive adult ICU patients were treated with ventilatory support over 6 hours. Of those 958, 619 (64.6%) survived one year, of whom 288 (46.5%) answered the quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D). We calculated EQ-5D index and predicted lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained using the age- and sex-matched life expectancy for survivors after one year. For expired patients the exact lifetime was used. We divided all hospital costs for all ARF patients by the number of hospital survivors, and by all predicted lifetime QALYs. We also adjusted for those who died before one year and for those with missing QOL to be able to estimate the total QALYs.
One-year mortality was 35% (95% CI 32 to 38%). For the 288 respondents median [IQR] EQ-5D index after one year was lower than that of the age- and sex-matched general population 0.70 [0.45 to 0.89] vs. 0.84 [0.81 to 0.88]. For these 288, the mean (SD) predicted lifetime QALYs was 15.4 (13.3). After adjustment for missing QOL the mean predicted lifetime (SD) QALYs was 11.3 (13.0) for all the 958 ARF patients. The mean estimated costs were 20.739 euro per hospital survivor, and mean predicted lifetime cost-utility for all ARF patients was 1391 euro per QALY.
Despite lower health-related QOL compared to reference values, our result suggests that cost per hospital survivor and lifetime cost-utility remain reasonable regardless of age, disease severity, and type or duration of ventilation support in patients with ARF.
高日常重症监护病房(ICU)费用与使用机械通气(MV)治疗急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)有关,需要评估危重病后的生活质量(QOL)并进行成本效益分析。
在 25 家芬兰 ICU 进行全国范围、前瞻性多中心观察性研究。在为期八周的研究期间,958 名连续的成年 ICU 患者接受了 6 小时以上的通气支持。在这 958 名患者中,有 619 名(64.6%)存活一年,其中 288 名(46.5%)回答了生活质量问卷(EQ-5D)。我们使用存活一年后的年龄和性别匹配的预期寿命计算了 EQ-5D 指数和预测的终身质量调整生命年(QALY)。对于已死亡的患者,使用了确切的终生。我们将所有 ARF 患者的医院总费用除以医院幸存者人数和所有预测的终生 QALY。我们还调整了那些在一年内死亡的人和那些生活质量缺失的人,以便能够估计总 QALY。
一年死亡率为 35%(95%CI 32%至 38%)。对于 288 名受访者,一年后中位数[IQR] EQ-5D 指数低于年龄和性别匹配的一般人群,为 0.70[0.45 至 0.89]比 0.84[0.81 至 0.88]。对于这 288 名患者,预测的终身平均(SD)QALY 为 15.4(13.3)。在调整生活质量缺失后,所有 958 名 ARF 患者的预测终身(SD)QALY 平均值为 11.3(13.0)。每位医院幸存者的平均估计费用为 20739 欧元,所有 ARF 患者的预测终身成本效益为 1391 欧元/QALY。
尽管与参考值相比健康相关的生活质量较低,但无论年龄、疾病严重程度以及 ARF 患者的通气支持类型或持续时间如何,我们的结果表明,每位医院幸存者的成本和终生成本效益仍然合理。