de Barcelos Beatriz Rodrigues, Coelho Nathália Gabriela Silva Santos, Santos Mayara Macedo Barrozo, Vale Francisca Letícia, Teixeira Ana Lúcia Coutinho, Pereira E Souza Lainny Martins, Zeringóta Viviane, de Oliveira Monteiro Caio Márcio, Eugenio Chesterton Ulysses Orlando, Obara Marcos Takashi
Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasilia, Metropolitan Center, Conjunto A, Lot 01, Federal District, Brasilia 72220-275, Brazil.
Department of Biological Sciences, Catholic University of Brasilia, QS 07, Lot 01, Taguatinga, Federal District, Brasilia 71966-700, Brazil.
Pathogens. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):9. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13010009.
is a species of public health interest because it is associated with the transmission of the bacteria that causes Brazilian Spotted Fever (BSF). The use of repellents on humans is a prophylactic measure widely used to provide protection against a series of arthropod vectors, including mosquitoes and ticks. However, in Brazil, the effectiveness of commercial repellents against is little known. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out specific studies to evaluate the repellency of these commercial products, registered for use against mosquitoes, against the star tick. The main goal of the present work was to evaluate the effectiveness of six commercial repellents against . Unfed nymphs, aged between two and eight weeks, were tested against products based on DEET (OFF! and Repelex), Icaridin (Exposis and SBP), and IR3535 (Johnsons and Henlau). Three bioassays were conducted to evaluate tick behavior: (i) filter paper, (ii) fingertip, and (iii) field. All bases tested showed high repellent activity, differing significantly ( < 0.05) from the control. It was observed the formulation with DEET resulted in the best results in the filter paper bioassay. In the fingertip bioassay, the DEET base repelled a greater number of ticks compared to Icaridin. In the field bioassay, there was no significant difference between the Icaridin base and DEET, and both formulations differed from the control ( < 0.05). The six formulations tested showed significant percentages of repellency against ticks; however, for the fingertip and field bioassays, the products OFF!, Repelex, and Exposis were tested as they showed better performance in the filter paper test. OFF! showed the best percentage of repellency (100%), followed by Repelex (96.8%), and Exposis (93.1%), considering the two-hour period of the bioassay-field-test. Proving the effectiveness of repellents on the market against presented in this study is crucial, since this is the main ectoparasite of humans that can transmit when infected. The effectiveness of commercial insect repellents against other tick species that parasitize humans can also be explored.
是一种具有公共卫生意义的物种,因为它与导致巴西斑疹热(BSF)的细菌传播有关。在人类身上使用驱虫剂是一种广泛使用的预防措施,用于防止一系列节肢动物媒介,包括蚊子和蜱虫。然而,在巴西,商业驱虫剂对的有效性鲜为人知。因此,有必要开展具体研究,以评估这些注册用于防蚊的商业产品对星蜱的驱避性。本研究的主要目标是评估六种商业驱虫剂对的有效性。对两到八周龄的未进食若虫进行了针对基于避蚊胺(OFF!和Repelex)、派卡瑞丁(Exposis和SBP)和IR3535(Johnsons和Henlau)的产品的测试。进行了三种生物测定以评估蜱虫行为:(i)滤纸,(ii)指尖,和(iii)野外。所有测试的基质都显示出高驱避活性,与对照相比有显著差异(<0.05)。观察到含避蚊胺的制剂在滤纸生物测定中产生了最佳结果。在指尖生物测定中,与派卡瑞丁相比,含避蚊胺的基质驱避的蜱虫数量更多。在野外生物测定中,派卡瑞丁基质和避蚊胺之间没有显著差异,且两种制剂均与对照不同(<0.05)。测试的六种制剂对蜱虫显示出显著的驱避百分比;然而,对于指尖和野外生物测定,测试了OFF!、Repelex和Exposis产品,因为它们在滤纸测试中表现更好。考虑到生物测定-野外测试的两小时时间段,OFF!显示出最佳的驱避百分比(100%),其次是Repelex(96.8%)和Exposis(93.1%)。证明本研究中市场上的驱虫剂对的有效性至关重要,因为这是人类的主要体外寄生虫,感染时可传播。还可以探索商业驱虫剂对寄生人类的其他蜱虫物种的有效性。