• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生足球运动员冲刺表现的特点。

Characteristics of sprint performance in college football players.

机构信息

Center for Physical Development Excellence, Department of Physical Education, United States Military Academy, West Point, NewYork, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1169-78. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d68107.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d68107
PMID:20386124
Abstract

To investigate sprinting strategy, acceleration and velocity patterns were determined in college football players (n = 61) during performance of a 9.1-, 36.6-, and 54.9-m sprints. Acceleration and velocity were determined at 9.1-m intervals during each sprint. Lower-body strength and power were evaluated by 1 repetition maximum (1-RM) squat, power clean, jerk, vertical jump, standing long jump, and standing triple jump. Sprint times averaged 1.78 +/- 0.11 seconds (9.1 m), 5.18 +/- 0.35 seconds (36.6 m), and 7.40 +/- 0.53 seconds. Acceleration peaked at 9.1 m (2.96 +/- 0.44 m x s(-2)), was held constant at 18.3 m (3.55 +/- 0.0.94 m x s(-2)), and was negative at 27.4 m (-1.02 +/- 0.72 m x s(-2)). Velocity peaked at 18.3 m (8.38 +/- 0.65 m x s(-2)) and decreased slightly, but significantly at 27.4 m (7.55 +/- 0.66 m x s(-2)), associated with the negative acceleration. Measures of lower-body strength were significantly related to acceleration, velocity, and sprint performance only when corrected for body mass. Lower-body strength/BM and power correlated highest with 36.6-m time (rs = -0.55 to -0.80) and with acceleration (strength r = 0.67-0.49; power r = 0.73-0.81) and velocity (strength r = 0.68-0.53; power r = 0.74-0.82) at 9.1 m. Sprint times and strength per body mass were significantly lower in lineman compared with linebackers-tight ends and backs. The acceleration and velocity patterns were the same for each position group, and differences in sprint time were determined by the magnitude of acceleration and velocity at 9.1 and 18.3 m. Sprint performance in football players is determined by a rapid increase in acceleration (through 18.3 m) and a high velocity maintained throughout the sprint and is independent of position played. The best sprint performances (independent of sprint distance) appear to be related to the highest initial acceleration (through 18.3 m) and highest attained and maintained velocity. Strength relative to body mass and power appears to impact initial acceleration and velocity (through 18.3 m) in contribution to sprint performance.

摘要

为了研究短跑策略,我们对 61 名大学生足球运动员进行了 9.1 米、36.6 米和 54.9 米短跑的冲刺速度和加速度模式的测试。在每次短跑中,我们在 9.1 米的间隔处测量加速度和速度。通过 1 次最大重复深蹲、力量清洁、挺举、垂直跳跃、立定跳远和立定三级跳远来评估下肢力量和力量。短跑时间平均为 1.78 +/- 0.11 秒(9.1 米)、5.18 +/- 0.35 秒(36.6 米)和 7.40 +/- 0.53 秒。加速度在 9.1 米处达到峰值(2.96 +/- 0.44 m x s(-2)),在 18.3 米处保持不变(3.55 +/- 0.0.94 m x s(-2)),在 27.4 米处为负值(-1.02 +/- 0.72 m x s(-2))。速度在 18.3 米处达到峰值(8.38 +/- 0.65 m x s(-2)),然后略有下降,但在 27.4 米处明显下降(7.55 +/- 0.66 m x s(-2)),与负加速度有关。仅当按体重校正时,下肢力量的测量值才与加速度、速度和短跑成绩显著相关。下肢力量/体重和力量与 36.6 米时间的相关性最高(rs = -0.55 至 -0.80),与加速度(力量 rs = 0.67-0.49;力量 rs = 0.73-0.81)和 9.1 米处的速度(力量 rs = 0.68-0.53;力量 rs = 0.74-0.82)。与线卫-紧身端和后卫相比,前锋的冲刺时间和体重力量明显较低。每个位置组的加速度和速度模式相同,而冲刺时间的差异则由 9.1 米和 18.3 米处的加速度和速度大小决定。足球运动员的冲刺表现取决于加速度的快速增加(通过 18.3 米)和整个冲刺过程中的高速度,并与位置无关。最佳的冲刺表现(与冲刺距离无关)似乎与初始加速度最高(通过 18.3 米)以及达到和保持的最高速度有关。与体重相比,力量和力量似乎会影响初始加速度和速度(通过 18.3 米),从而对冲刺表现产生影响。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of sprint performance in college football players.大学生足球运动员冲刺表现的特点。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1169-78. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d68107.
2
Relationship Between Body Mass, Peak Power, and Power-to-Body Mass Ratio on Sprint Velocity and Momentum in High-School Football Players.青少年足球运动员体重、最大功率与功率体重比与冲刺速度和冲量的关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33(7):1871-1877. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002808.
3
Comparison of lower body strength, power, acceleration, speed, agility, and sprint momentum to describe and compare playing rank among professional rugby league players.比较下肢力量、爆发力、加速度、速度、敏捷性和冲刺动量,以描述和比较职业橄榄球联盟球员的比赛等级。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):153-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f9519.
4
Strength, power, and speed qualities in English junior elite rugby league players.英国青少年精英橄榄球联盟球员的力量、功率和速度素质。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Sep;27(9):2414-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182804a6d.
5
Transfer effect of strength and power training to the sprinting kinematics of international rugby players.力量与功率训练对国际橄榄球运动员短跑运动学的转移效应。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Sep;28(9):2585-96. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000423.
6
Positional relationships between various sprint and jump abilities in elite American football players.美式橄榄球精英运动员各种短跑和跳跃能力的位置关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):388-97. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225b5fa.
7
Are changes in maximal squat strength during preseason training reflected in changes in sprint performance in rugby league players?赛前训练期间最大深蹲力量的变化是否反映在橄榄球联盟运动员冲刺表现的变化中?
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Mar;26(3):772-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822a5cbf.
8
The relationship between core stability and performance in division I football players.一级橄榄球运动员的核心稳定性与运动表现之间的关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1750-4. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874564.
9
Peak power in the hexagonal barbell jump squat and its relationship to jump performance and acceleration in elite rugby union players.精英橄榄球联盟球员六角杠铃深蹲跳中的峰值功率及其与跳跃表现和加速度的关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 May;29(5):1234-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000770.
10
A comparison of maximal squat strength and 5-, 10-, and 20-meter sprint times, in athletes and recreationally trained men.运动员和业余训练男性的最大深蹲力量与 5 米、10 米和 20 米冲刺时间的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Apr;26(4):937-40. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822e5889.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of chronic low back pain and motor control impairment on athletic performance in elite soccer players: a cross-sectional study.慢性下腰痛和运动控制障碍对精英足球运动员运动表现的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 12;26(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09023-x.
2
Effect of two training modalities on sprint performance in young American football players.两种训练方式对美国年轻橄榄球运动员短跑成绩的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Apr 7;7:1554055. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1554055. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of WIMU Sensor Performance in Estimating Running Stride and Vertical Stiffness in Football Training Sessions: A Comparison with Smart Insoles.
在足球训练课中评估无线惯性测量单元(WIMU)传感器在估计跑步步幅和垂直刚度方面的性能:与智能鞋垫的比较
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;24(24):8087. doi: 10.3390/s24248087.
4
Effects of Fast-Tempo and Binaural Beat Therapy Music during Warm-Up on Repeated Sprint Ability Test Performance among Young Soccer Players.热身期间快节奏和双耳节拍疗法音乐对年轻足球运动员重复冲刺能力测试表现的影响。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):673. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070673.
5
An investigation of tendon strains in jersey finger injury load cases using a finite element neuromuscular human body model.使用有限元神经肌肉人体模型对运动衫手指损伤负荷病例中的肌腱应变进行的研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Dec 14;11:1293705. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1293705. eCollection 2023.
6
Plyometric Training Practices of Brazilian Olympic Sprint and Jump Coaches: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Their Choices and Insights.巴西奥运会短跑和跳跃项目教练的增强式训练实践:深入理解他们的选择与见解
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jul 15;87:131-150. doi: 10.5114/jhk/169167. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Effects of horizontal compared to vertical-based plyometric jump training on semi-professional soccer player's performance.水平与垂直式增强式跳跃训练对半职业足球运动员表现的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 20;13(1):10039. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37213-x.
8
Effect of core training on skill-related physical fitness performance among soccer players: A systematic review.核心训练对足球运动员技能相关体能表现的影响:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;10:1046456. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1046456. eCollection 2022.
9
On-Field Tests for Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.前交叉韧带重建术后患者的现场测试:一项范围综述
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 3;10(1):23259671211055481. doi: 10.1177/23259671211055481. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
How did three consecutive matches with extra time affect physical performance? A case study of the 2018 football Men's World Cup.连续三场比赛都有加时赛对体能表现有何影响?一项关于2018年男子足球世界杯的案例研究。
Biol Sport. 2021 Mar;38(1):65-70. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.97668. Epub 2020 Aug 21.