Canadian Sport Center-Pacific, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):388-97. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225b5fa.
The purpose of this study was to investigate positional relationships between sprint and jump abilities and body mass in elite college American football players (n = 1,136). Data from the annual National Football League combine over the years 2005-2009 were examined. The measures included for examination were the 9.1-, 18.3-, 36.6-, and flying 18.3-m sprints and the vertical and horizontal jumps. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to determine the relationships between the tests, and coefficients of determination (r2) were used to determine common variance. With the exception of the relationship between the 9.1-m and the flying 18.3-m sprints, the relationships between all sprints are very strong. Vertical jump ability is more strongly associated with maximum speed, as compared with acceleration. Horizontal jump ability is similarly associated with maximum speed and acceleration. The 9.1-, 18.3-, and flying 18.3-m sprints and the jump tests would appear to measure independent skills. Stationary start sprints up to 36.6 m appear to be heavily influenced by acceleration and may thus measure similar characteristics. The flying 18.3-m sprint is recommended as a measure of maximum speed. Body mass was most strongly associated with performance in the lineman group. When body mass was controlled for, correlations weakened across all the groups. The role of body mass remains unclear. Regardless of sport, the present research supports the notion that the relationships between various sprint and jump abilities warrant positional consideration. Coaches and practitioners will be able to use the findings of this research to better test and monitor athletes requiring different skills.
本研究旨在探讨美式橄榄球精英大学生运动员的短跑和跳跃能力与体重之间的位置关系(n=1136)。研究考察了 2005-2009 年期间国家橄榄球联盟年度选秀联合测试的数据。检查的测量包括 9.1 米、18.3 米、36.6 米和飞跑 18.3 米短跑以及垂直和水平跳跃。计算 Pearson 相关系数(r)以确定测试之间的关系,并用决定系数(r2)来确定共同方差。除了 9.1 米和飞跑 18.3 米短跑之间的关系外,所有短跑之间的关系都非常强。与加速度相比,垂直跳跃能力与最大速度的关系更强。水平跳跃能力与最大速度和加速度的关系相似。9.1 米、18.3 米和飞跑 18.3 米短跑和跳跃测试似乎测量的是独立的技能。36.6 米以内的固定起跑短跑似乎受到加速度的强烈影响,因此可能测量到相似的特征。飞跑 18.3 米短跑被推荐作为最大速度的测量。体重与线卫组的表现最密切相关。当控制体重时,所有组的相关性都减弱了。体重的作用仍不清楚。无论运动项目如何,本研究都支持这样一种观点,即各种短跑和跳跃能力之间的关系值得考虑位置因素。教练和从业者将能够利用本研究的发现,更好地测试和监测需要不同技能的运动员。