Simecek J, Pulkrábek M
Institut für Hygiene und Epidemiologie Prag.
Z Gesamte Hyg. 1991 Mar;37(3):109-12.
Advantages and disadvantages of the estimation of the mass and number fibrous dusts concentrations are discussed. By using the reference phase contrast microscopic method (1) the data of interlaboratory comparative measurements of MMMF (man-made mineral fibres/density/f.mm-2) have been got and are presented. Total mass dust concentrations and number concentrations of MMMF and/or asbestos fibres are compared. The consequent measurements were made in the same time intervals and in the same workplaces. In conclusion both measuring methods are critically evaluated and their results are compared with the prescribed MAC-values. Presented results are of use when deciding what method with respect to the kind of fibrous dust and to the working operation should be chosen.
讨论了估算纤维状粉尘质量浓度和数量浓度的优缺点。通过使用参考相差显微镜法(1),已获得并呈现了人造矿物纤维(MMMF,单位:密度/f.mm -2)实验室间对比测量的数据。比较了MMMF和/或石棉纤维的总质量粉尘浓度和数量浓度。后续测量在相同的时间间隔和相同的工作场所进行。最后,对这两种测量方法进行了批判性评估,并将其结果与规定的最高容许浓度(MAC)值进行了比较。当根据纤维状粉尘的种类和工作操作来决定应选择何种方法时,所呈现的结果具有参考价值。