Suppr超能文献

有些,甚至可能全部的语用充实都是即时发生的:即时语用充实的证据。

"Some," and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, PA 19081, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

Abstract

Scalar inferences are commonly generated when a speaker uses a weaker expression rather than a stronger alternative, e.g., John ate some of the apples implies that he did not eat them all. This article describes a visual-world study investigating how and when perceivers compute these inferences. Participants followed spoken instructions containing the scalar quantifier some directing them to interact with one of several referential targets (e.g., Click on the girl who has some of the balloons). Participants fixated on the target compatible with the implicated meaning of some and avoided a competitor compatible with the literal meaning prior to a disambiguating noun. Further, convergence on the target was as fast for some as for the non-scalar quantifiers none and all. These findings indicate that the scalar inference is computed immediately and is not delayed relative to the literal interpretation of some. It is argued that previous demonstrations that scalar inferences increase processing time are not necessarily due to delays in generating the inference itself, but rather arise because integrating the interpretation of the inference with relevant information in the context may require additional time. With sufficient contextual support, processing delays disappear.

摘要

当说话者使用较弱的表达而不是更强的替代词时,通常会产生数量级推理,例如,“约翰吃了一些苹果”意味着他没有吃完所有的苹果。本文描述了一项视觉世界研究,探讨了感知者如何以及何时计算这些推理。参与者遵循包含数量级量词“一些”的口语指令,指导他们与几个参考目标中的一个进行交互(例如,点击那个拿着一些气球的女孩)。参与者在名词有歧义之前,将目光集中在与“一些”暗示的含义一致的目标上,并避免与字面含义一致的竞争者。此外,“一些”与非数量级量词“无”和“都”一样,对目标的趋同速度一样快。这些发现表明,数量级推理是立即计算的,与“一些”的字面解释相比并不延迟。有人认为,先前表明数量级推理会增加处理时间的研究结果不一定是由于生成推理本身的延迟,而是因为将推理的解释与上下文中的相关信息整合可能需要额外的时间。有了足够的上下文支持,处理延迟就会消失。

相似文献

1
"Some," and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment.
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
2
On children's variable success with scalar inferences: Insights from disjunction in the scope of a universal quantifier.
Cognition. 2018 Sep;178:178-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
3
Processing of Scalar Inferences by Mandarin Learners of English: An Online Measure.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0145494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145494. eCollection 2016.
5
Intonation and Pragmatic Enrichment: How Intonation Constrains Ad Hoc Scalar Inferences.
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):200-223. doi: 10.1177/0023830917716101.
7
Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface.
Cogn Psychol. 2009 May;58(3):376-415. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
8
Beyond words: Pragmatic inference in behavioral variant of frontotemporal degeneration.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:556-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
9
Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development.
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Feb;60(1):40-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
10
Are scalar implicatures automatically processed and different for each individual? A mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
Brain Res. 2015 Mar 2;1599:137-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.049. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Scalar Implicature is Sensitive to Contextual Alternatives.
Cogn Sci. 2023 Feb;47(2):e13238. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13238.
2
Salient alternatives facilitate implicatures.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0265781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265781. eCollection 2022.
3
What second-language speakers can tell us about pragmatic processing.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 18;17(2):e0263724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263724. eCollection 2022.
4
Early ERP Evidence for Children's and Adult's Sensitivity to Scalar Implicatures Triggered by Existential Quantifiers ().
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 10;12:657408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657408. eCollection 2021.
5
The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 19;12:679491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679491. eCollection 2021.
6
Child-Like Adults: Dual-Task Effects on Collective vs. Distributive Sentence Interpretations.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 10;12:556120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.556120. eCollection 2021.
8
Asymmetries Between Direct and Indirect Scalar Implicatures in Second Language Acquisition.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00877. eCollection 2019.
9
Talking about SOME and ALL: What determines the usage of quantity-denoting expressions?
Discourse Process. 2018;55(8):686-703. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1317170. Epub 2017 May 25.
10
Linking Hypothesis and Number of Response Options Modulate Inferred Scalar Implicature Rate.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 12;10:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00189. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition.
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):133-56. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336987.
2
SUN: Top-down saliency using natural statistics.
Vis cogn. 2009 Aug 1;17(6-7):979-1003. doi: 10.1080/13506280902771138.
3
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
4
The importance of proving the null.
Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):439-53. doi: 10.1037/a0015251.
5
Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface.
Cogn Psychol. 2009 May;58(3):376-415. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
6
Conceptual combination during sentence comprehension: evidence for compositional processes.
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):397-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01912.x.
7
Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.
Cognition. 2007 Nov;105(2):466-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.008.
9
The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension.
Cognition. 2005 Apr;95(3):275-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.007. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
10
The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):121-32. doi: 10.1037/h0085792.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验