John Racliffe Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford, UK OX2 6H3, UK.
Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1108-14. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576611. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
Most guidelines now recommend that patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) are assessed within 24 hours of their event, but the feasibility of this depends on patients' behavior. We studied behavior immediately after TIA and minor stroke according to clinical characteristics, patients' perception of the nature of the event, and their predicted stroke risk.
In a population-based study in Oxfordshire, UK, with face-to-face interview of 1000 consecutive patients with TIA and minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale < or =5) from 2002 to 2007 (Oxford Vascular Study), we studied delay in seeking medical attention and identified patients who did not seek attention after an initial event and only presented after a recurrent stroke.
Of 1000 patients (459 TIAs, 541 minor strokes), 300 (67%) with TIA and 400 (74%) with minor stroke sought medical attention within 24 hours and 208 (47%) and 234 (46%), respectively, sought attention within 3 hours. Most patients (77%) first sought attention through their primary care physician. In patients with TIA, incorrect recognition of symptoms, absence of motor or speech symptoms, shorter duration of event, lower ABCD(2) score, no history of stroke or atrial fibrillation, and weekend presentation were associated with significantly longer delays. However, age, sex, social class, and educational level were all unrelated to either correct recognition of symptoms or to delay in seeking attention. Of 129 patients with TIA or minor stroke who had a recurrent stroke within 90 days, 41 (31%) did not seek medical attention after their initial event. These patients were more likely to have had a TIA (P=0.003), shorter duration of event (P=0.02), and a history of TIA (P=0.09) and less likely to have had motor (P=0.004) or speech symptoms (P=0.04) compared with those patients who sought medical attention for their initial event.
Approximately 70% of patients do not correctly recognize their TIA or minor stroke, 30% delay seeking medical attention for >24 hours, regardless of age, sex, social class, or educational level, and approximately 30% of early recurrent strokes occur before seeking attention. Without more effective public education of all demographic groups, the full potential of acute prevention will not be realized.
目前大多数指南都建议,有小中风或高危短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者应在发病后 24 小时内接受评估,但这取决于患者的行为。我们根据临床特征、患者对事件性质的认知以及他们预测的中风风险,研究了 TIA 和小中风后患者的行为。
在英国牛津郡进行的一项基于人群的研究中,我们对 2002 年至 2007 年期间的 1000 名连续 TIA 和小中风(美国国立卫生研究院中风量表[NIHSS]评分≤5)患者进行了面对面访谈(牛津血管研究),研究了就诊延迟的情况,并确定了在首次发作后未寻求治疗,仅在再次发生中风后才就诊的患者。
1000 例患者中(459 例 TIA,541 例小中风),300 例 TIA 患者(67%)和 400 例小中风患者(74%)在 24 小时内就诊,208 例(47%)和 234 例(46%)分别在 3 小时内就诊。大多数患者(77%)首次通过初级保健医生就诊。在 TIA 患者中,症状识别错误、无运动或言语症状、发作时间较短、ABCD(2)评分较低、无中风或心房颤动史、以及周末就诊与明显较长的就诊延迟有关。然而,年龄、性别、社会阶层和教育水平均与正确识别症状或就诊延迟无关。在 129 例有 TIA 或小中风且在 90 天内再次发生中风的患者中,有 41 例(31%)在首次发作后未寻求医疗救治。这些患者更有可能患有 TIA(P=0.003)、发作时间较短(P=0.02)、且有 TIA 病史(P=0.09),不太可能有运动(P=0.004)或言语症状(P=0.04),与那些因首次发作而寻求医疗救治的患者相比。
大约 70%的患者不能正确识别他们的 TIA 或小中风,30%的患者在 24 小时后才寻求医疗救治,这与年龄、性别、社会阶层或教育水平无关,大约 30%的早期复发性中风发生在寻求治疗之前。如果不对所有人群进行更有效的公共教育,急性预防的全部潜力将无法实现。