Canadian Forces Health Services Headquarter, Directorate Medical Policy, National Defense of Canada, 1745 Alta Vista Dr, Ontario (K1A 0K6), Ottawa, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Apr 18;11:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-72.
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystem disorder that demonstrates variable symptoms and rates of progression. Muscle weakness is considered one of the main problems with a clinical picture that is characterized by distal weakness of the limbs progressing to proximal weakness. The main objective of this study was to characterize the maximal strength of ankle eversion and dorsiflexion in DM1 patients. Manual and handheld dynamometer (HHD) muscle testing were also compared.
The maximal strength of 22 patients from Quebec (mean age = 41,1 +/- 13,8) and 24 from Lyon (mean age = 41,6 +/- 10,2) were compared to 16 matched controls.
With the use of HHD, an excellent reproducibility of the torque measurements was obtained for both centers in eversion (R2 = 0,94/Quebec; 0,89/Lyon) and dorsiflexion (R2 = 0,96/Quebec; 0,90/Lyon). The differences between 3 groups of DM1 (mild, moderate, severe) and between them and controls were all statistically significant (p < 0,001). No statistical differences between sites were observed (p > 0.05). The degree of muscle strength decline in dorsiflexion (eversion) were 60% (47%), 77% (71%), and 87% (83%) for DM1 with mild, moderate, and severe impairments, respectively. The smallest mean difference between all DM1 patients taking together was 2.3 Nm, a difference about twice than the standard error of measurement. There was a strong relationship between eversion and dorsiflexion strength profiles (R2 = 0,87;Quebec/0,80;Lyon). Using a 10-point scale, manual muscle testing could not discriminate between the 3 groups of DM1 patients.
The HHD protocol showed discriminative properties suitable for multicentre therapeutic trial. The present results confirmed the capacity of quantitative muscle testing to discriminate between healthy and DM1 patients with different levels of impairments. This study is a preliminary step for the implementation of a valid, reliable and responsive clinical outcome for the measurement of muscle impairments with this population.
1 型肌强直性营养不良(DM1)是一种多系统疾病,表现出不同的症状和进展速度。肌肉无力被认为是其主要问题之一,其临床表现的特征是四肢远端无力逐渐进展为近端无力。本研究的主要目的是描述 DM1 患者的踝外翻和背屈的最大力量。还比较了手动和手持测力计(HHD)的肌肉测试。
比较了来自魁北克的 22 名患者(平均年龄=41.1±13.8)和来自里昂的 24 名患者(平均年龄=41.6±10.2)与 16 名匹配对照者的最大力量。
使用 HHD,两个中心的外翻(魁北克 R2=0.94;里昂 R2=0.89)和背屈(魁北克 R2=0.96;里昂 R2=0.90)的扭矩测量均具有极好的可重复性。3 组 DM1(轻度、中度、重度)之间以及它们与对照组之间的差异均具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。未观察到不同部位之间的统计学差异(p>0.05)。DM1 患者的背屈(外翻)肌肉力量下降程度分别为轻度、中度和重度分别为 60%(47%)、77%(71%)和 87%(83%)。所有 DM1 患者中,最小的平均差异为 2.3Nm,大约是测量标准误差的两倍。外翻和背屈力量谱之间存在很强的关系(R2=0.87;魁北克 R2=0.80;里昂 R2=0.80)。使用 10 分制,手动肌肉测试无法区分 3 组 DM1 患者。
HHD 方案显示出适合多中心治疗试验的鉴别特性。本研究结果证实,定量肌肉测试能够区分不同损伤程度的健康人和 DM1 患者。本研究是在该人群中实施有效、可靠和敏感的肌肉损伤临床结局测量的初步步骤。