Suppr超能文献

医疗保险受益人对药品部分(Part D)的了解和选择,2005 年至今。

Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge of and choices regarding Part D, 2005 to the present.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May;58(5):950-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02812.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

Abstract

In the months before and years since Medicare Part D's implementation in January 2006, many have been concerned with beneficiaries' ability to benefit from the complex program. A systematic review of published Medline and gray literature from January 1, 2005, to August 20, 2009, was undertaken to evaluate Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge about Part D and how this knowledge informed decisions regarding enrollment and plan choice. Thirty articles that reported original results describing seniors' knowledge of the Part D benefit, decision to enroll, or selection of plans; results from patient surveys addressing these issues; or results that analyzed enrollment data or plan selection patterns were included. Of these 30 articles, 10 described beneficiaries' knowledge, 12 described enrollment and plan choices, and eight described knowledge and choice. Across studies and years, beneficiaries' knowledge of the Part D program and benefit structure and design was poor, particularly with regard to the coverage gap and the low-income subsidy. Beneficiaries had great difficulty choosing the lowest-cost Part D plans and were disinclined to switch plans to improve their benefits. Knowledge deficits, enrollment problems, and plan choice difficulties were most pronounced during Part D implementation in early 2006 but persisted in subsequent years of the benefit. Beneficiaries' knowledge and choices should be monitored on an ongoing basis to inform potential changes to the Part D program.

摘要

在 2006 年 1 月医疗保险部分 D 实施之前的几个月和之后的几年里,许多人一直关注受益人的能力,以从复杂的计划中受益。对 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 8 月 20 日发表的 Medline 和灰色文献进行了系统回顾,以评估医疗保险受益人对部分 D 的了解,以及这种知识如何影响他们对注册和计划选择的决策。有 30 篇文章报告了原始结果,描述了老年人对部分 D 利益、注册决定或计划选择的了解;针对这些问题进行的患者调查结果;或分析注册数据或计划选择模式的结果。在这 30 篇文章中,有 10 篇描述了受益人的知识,12 篇描述了注册和计划选择,8 篇描述了知识和选择。在研究和年份中,受益人对部分 D 计划和福利结构和设计的了解很差,特别是在覆盖缺口和低收入补贴方面。受益人在选择最低成本的部分 D 计划方面有很大困难,并且不愿意更换计划以改善他们的福利。知识缺陷、注册问题和计划选择困难在 2006 年初部分 D 实施期间最为明显,但在该福利的后续几年中仍然存在。应持续监测受益人的知识和选择,以告知部分 D 计划的潜在变化。

相似文献

1
Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge of and choices regarding Part D, 2005 to the present.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May;58(5):950-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02812.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
2
Medicare Part D's effect on the under- and overuse of medications: a systematic review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Oct;59(10):1922-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03537.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
5
Changes in drug use and out-of-pocket costs associated with Medicare Part D implementation: a systematic review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Sep;58(9):1764-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03025.x.
10
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Sep;31(9):868-878. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868.
3
Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.
4
Trends in Older Adults' Knowledge of Medicare Advantage Benefits, 2010 to 2016.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2343-2347. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16656. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Social and Health-Related Factors Associated with Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans in Older Adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):313-320. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16202. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan disenrollment reasons survey.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):930-939. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13160. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
8
Patient Experiences in Selecting a Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan.
J Patient Exp. 2018 Jun;5(2):147-152. doi: 10.1177/2374373517739413. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
A national survey of ethnic differences in knowledge and understanding of supplementary health insurance.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Mar 7;6:12. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0137-4. eCollection 2017.
10
Assessment of medicare part d communications to beneficiaries.
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2010 Sep;3(5):310-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Take-up of Medicare Part D: results from the Health and Retirement Study.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Jul;65(4):492-501. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp107. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
4
Medicare Part D update--lessons learned and unfinished business.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):406-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr0809949.
5
Medicare part D enrollment in a biracial community-based population of older adults.
Gerontologist. 2009 Dec;49(6):828-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp055. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
6
Whom do older adults trust most to provide information about prescription drugs?
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.04.005.
9
Who thinks that part d is too complicated? Survey results on the medicare prescription drug benefit.
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1):97-115. doi: 10.1177/1077558708324340. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
10
Medicare Part D: how do vulnerable beneficiaries fare?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2008 Apr;35:1-11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验