• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge of and choices regarding Part D, 2005 to the present.医疗保险受益人对药品部分(Part D)的了解和选择,2005 年至今。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May;58(5):950-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02812.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
2
Medicare Part D's effect on the under- and overuse of medications: a systematic review.医疗保险处方药部分对药物使用不足和过度使用的影响:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Oct;59(10):1922-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03537.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
4
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
5
Changes in drug use and out-of-pocket costs associated with Medicare Part D implementation: a systematic review.医疗保险处方药部分实施相关的用药变化和自付费用:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Sep;58(9):1764-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03025.x.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
7
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
8
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.应对复杂性:一款用户友好型医疗保险D部分患者决策辅助工具的开发与试点测试
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Sep;31(9):868-878. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868.
2
A digital divide in the COVID-19 pandemic: information exchange among older Medicare beneficiaries and stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间存在数字鸿沟:老年 Medicare 受益人和利益相关者之间的信息交流。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03674-4.
3
Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries.定性探究影响医疗保险受益人计划选择过程的因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.
4
Trends in Older Adults' Knowledge of Medicare Advantage Benefits, 2010 to 2016.2010 至 2016 年老年人对医疗保险优势福利认知的变化趋势。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2343-2347. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16656. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Social and Health-Related Factors Associated with Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans in Older Adults.与老年人参加医疗保险优势计划相关的社会和健康因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):313-320. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16202. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Comparative Usability Study of a Newly Created Patient-Centered Tool and Medicare.gov Plan Finder to Help Medicare Beneficiaries Choose Prescription Drug Plans.一项新创建的以患者为中心的工具与医保.gov计划查找器的比较可用性研究,以帮助医疗保险受益人选择处方药计划。
J Patient Exp. 2019 Mar;6(1):81-86. doi: 10.1177/2374373518778343. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan disenrollment reasons survey.医疗保险优势计划和处方药计划退保原因调查的心理计量学评估。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):930-939. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13160. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
8
Patient Experiences in Selecting a Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plan.患者选择医疗保险D部分处方药计划的经历。
J Patient Exp. 2018 Jun;5(2):147-152. doi: 10.1177/2374373517739413. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
A national survey of ethnic differences in knowledge and understanding of supplementary health insurance.一项关于补充医疗保险知识与理解方面种族差异的全国性调查。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Mar 7;6:12. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0137-4. eCollection 2017.
10
Assessment of medicare part d communications to beneficiaries.医疗保险D部分与受益人的沟通评估
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2010 Sep;3(5):310-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Take-up of Medicare Part D: results from the Health and Retirement Study.医疗保险部分 D 的参保情况:来自健康与退休研究的结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Jul;65(4):492-501. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp107. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
2
Cost minimization of medicare part D prescription drug plan expenditures.医疗保险D部分处方药计划支出的成本最小化
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Aug;15(8):545-53.
3
Getting tools used: lessons learned from successful decision support tools unrelated to health care.了解所使用的工具:从与医疗保健无关的成功决策支持工具中吸取的经验教训。
Find Brief. 2009 Jul;12(5):1-6.
4
Medicare Part D update--lessons learned and unfinished business.医疗保险D部分更新——经验教训与未竟之事。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):406-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr0809949.
5
Medicare part D enrollment in a biracial community-based population of older adults.医疗保险 D 部分在一个以老年人群为基础的多种族社区中的参保情况。
Gerontologist. 2009 Dec;49(6):828-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp055. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
6
Whom do older adults trust most to provide information about prescription drugs?老年人最信任谁来提供有关处方药的信息?
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.04.005.
7
Effect of cost sharing on prescription drug use by Medicare beneficiaries prior to the Medicare Drug Benefit and potential adverse selection in the benefit.在联邦医疗保险药品福利计划实施之前,成本分摊对联邦医疗保险受益人的处方药使用情况以及该福利计划中潜在逆向选择的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Jan-Feb;49(1):18-25. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08001.
8
Medicare Part D formulary coverage since program inception: are beneficiaries choosing wisely?自医疗保险D部分药品目录覆盖计划启动以来:受益人的选择明智吗?
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Nov;14(11 Suppl):SP29-35.
9
Who thinks that part d is too complicated? Survey results on the medicare prescription drug benefit.谁认为d部分过于复杂?医疗保险处方药福利的调查结果。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Feb;66(1):97-115. doi: 10.1177/1077558708324340. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
10
Medicare Part D: how do vulnerable beneficiaries fare?医疗保险D部分:弱势受益人的情况如何?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2008 Apr;35:1-11.

医疗保险受益人对药品部分(Part D)的了解和选择,2005 年至今。

Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge of and choices regarding Part D, 2005 to the present.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May;58(5):950-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02812.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02812.x
PMID:20406313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2909383/
Abstract

In the months before and years since Medicare Part D's implementation in January 2006, many have been concerned with beneficiaries' ability to benefit from the complex program. A systematic review of published Medline and gray literature from January 1, 2005, to August 20, 2009, was undertaken to evaluate Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge about Part D and how this knowledge informed decisions regarding enrollment and plan choice. Thirty articles that reported original results describing seniors' knowledge of the Part D benefit, decision to enroll, or selection of plans; results from patient surveys addressing these issues; or results that analyzed enrollment data or plan selection patterns were included. Of these 30 articles, 10 described beneficiaries' knowledge, 12 described enrollment and plan choices, and eight described knowledge and choice. Across studies and years, beneficiaries' knowledge of the Part D program and benefit structure and design was poor, particularly with regard to the coverage gap and the low-income subsidy. Beneficiaries had great difficulty choosing the lowest-cost Part D plans and were disinclined to switch plans to improve their benefits. Knowledge deficits, enrollment problems, and plan choice difficulties were most pronounced during Part D implementation in early 2006 but persisted in subsequent years of the benefit. Beneficiaries' knowledge and choices should be monitored on an ongoing basis to inform potential changes to the Part D program.

摘要

在 2006 年 1 月医疗保险部分 D 实施之前的几个月和之后的几年里,许多人一直关注受益人的能力,以从复杂的计划中受益。对 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 8 月 20 日发表的 Medline 和灰色文献进行了系统回顾,以评估医疗保险受益人对部分 D 的了解,以及这种知识如何影响他们对注册和计划选择的决策。有 30 篇文章报告了原始结果,描述了老年人对部分 D 利益、注册决定或计划选择的了解;针对这些问题进行的患者调查结果;或分析注册数据或计划选择模式的结果。在这 30 篇文章中,有 10 篇描述了受益人的知识,12 篇描述了注册和计划选择,8 篇描述了知识和选择。在研究和年份中,受益人对部分 D 计划和福利结构和设计的了解很差,特别是在覆盖缺口和低收入补贴方面。受益人在选择最低成本的部分 D 计划方面有很大困难,并且不愿意更换计划以改善他们的福利。知识缺陷、注册问题和计划选择困难在 2006 年初部分 D 实施期间最为明显,但在该福利的后续几年中仍然存在。应持续监测受益人的知识和选择,以告知部分 D 计划的潜在变化。