Suppr超能文献

将 Fried 衰弱标准作为一项随机对照试验的纳入标准:个人经验和文献复习。

The Fried frailty criteria as inclusion criteria for a randomized controlled trial: personal experience and literature review.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

Gerontology. 2011;57(1):11-8. doi: 10.1159/000313433. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

among current operational definitions of frailty, the criteria proposed by Fried and colleagues have attracted great scientific interest. However, these criteria have usually been applied in epidemiological and only rarely in interventional studies.

OBJECTIVE

the present paper aims at testing the applicability of the Fried frailty criteria in the context of the recruitment process of a randomized controlled trial in prefrail older persons, and it discusses the respective scientific literature.

METHODS

recruitment was promoted by newspaper articles as well as by targeted mail to customers of a local health insurance company and to recently treated patients of a geriatric day clinic. Furthermore, presentations were given in assisted living facilities. Potential candidates were screened for prefrailty, i.e. to see whether they met 1 or 2 of the Fried criteria (weight loss, handgrip strength, gait speed, exhaustion, physical activity).

RESULTS

a total of 298 people were screened. Among them 181 were not frail, 116 were prefrail and 1 was diagnosed as frail. The most prevalent criterion was exhaustion (24% of those screened). The second most prevalent criterion was low handgrip strength (20%). Low gait speed (8%), low physical activity (2%) and weight loss (2%) had a lower prevalence. According to the Geriatric Depression Scale, 14% of those who met the criterion 'exhaustion' were depressed. With regard to the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire, used for the evaluation of 'physical activity', only 3 activities among the 18 selected by Fried were applicable to our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

under the study conditions, good applicability of the Fried criteria was observed. Nevertheless, further refinement may be expedient in several criteria, especially exhaustion and physical activity, to enhance clinical usefulness. It may be helpful to adapt the cutoffs when applying the criteria to a European population.

摘要

背景

在当前的衰弱操作定义中,弗里德(Fried)及其同事提出的标准引起了极大的科学兴趣。然而,这些标准通常仅应用于流行病学研究,很少应用于干预性研究。

目的

本研究旨在测试弗里德衰弱标准在衰弱前期老年人的随机对照试验招募过程中的适用性,并讨论相关的科学文献。

方法

通过报纸文章以及向当地健康保险公司的客户和老年日间诊所最近接受治疗的患者有针对性地邮寄,促进了招募工作。此外,还在辅助生活设施中进行了介绍。对潜在的候选人进行衰弱前期的筛选,即查看他们是否符合弗里德标准中的 1 项或 2 项(体重减轻、握力、步速、疲惫、体力活动)。

结果

共筛选了 298 人。其中 181 人不虚弱,116 人衰弱前期,1 人衰弱。最常见的标准是疲惫(占筛选人数的 24%)。其次最常见的标准是握力低(20%)。步速低(8%)、体力活动低(2%)和体重减轻(2%)的发生率较低。根据老年抑郁量表,符合“疲惫”标准的人中,有 14%的人抑郁。就用于评估“体力活动”的明尼苏达州闲暇时间体力活动问卷而言,弗里德选择的 18 项活动中只有 3 项适用于我们的队列。

结论

在研究条件下,弗里德标准具有良好的适用性。然而,在几个标准(特别是疲惫和体力活动)中进一步细化可能会提高临床实用性。在将标准应用于欧洲人群时,可能有助于调整截止值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验