• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Imputing Risk Tolerance From Survey Responses.从调查回复中估算风险承受能力。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Sep 1;103(483):1028-1038. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000139.
2
How Much Does Risk Tolerance Change?风险承受能力会有多大变化?
Q J Finance. 2012;2(4). doi: 10.1142/S2010139212500206.
3
Retirement and wealth.退休与财富。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):66-91. doi: 10.3386/w8229.
4
Improving Identification of Medicaid Eligible Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Major Household Surveys with Limited Income or Asset Information.利用有限的收入或资产信息在主要家庭调查中改善对符合医疗补助条件的社区居住老年人的识别。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2023 Oct;23(4):416-432. doi: 10.1007/s10742-022-00297-5. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
5
"Acceptance of Mixed Gambles Is Sensitive to the Range of Gains and Losses Experienced, and "Estimates of Lambda (k) Are Not a Reliable Measure of Loss Aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2021)": Correction.对混合赌博的接受程度对所经历的收益和损失范围敏感,且“λ(k)的估计并非损失厌恶的可靠度量:对安德烈和德朗格(2021年)的回复”:勘误
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jan;151(1):160. doi: 10.1037/xge0001200.
6
Individual account retirement plans: an analysis of the 2007 survey of consumer finances, with market adjustments to June 2009.个人账户退休计划:对2007年消费者财务状况调查的分析,并对2009年6月进行市场调整。
EBRI Issue Brief. 2009 Aug(333):4-34, 1.
7
The Value of a Statistical Life for Risk-Averse and Risk-Seeking Individuals.风险规避和风险寻求个体的统计生命价值。
Risk Anal. 2019 Nov;39(11):2369-2390. doi: 10.1111/risa.13329. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Medical insurance, health risks, and household financial asset allocation: evidence from China household finance survey.医疗保险、健康风险与家庭金融资产配置:来自中国家庭金融调查的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 22;11:1268470. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268470. eCollection 2023.
9
Modeling the Relationship between Proxy Measures of Respondent Burden and Survey Response Rates in a Household Panel Survey.家庭面板调查中受访者负担替代指标与调查回应率之间关系的建模
J Off Stat. 2022 Dec;38(4):1145-1175. doi: 10.2478/jos-2022-0049.
10
Can the General Public Be a Proxy for an "At-Risk" Group in a Patient Preference Study? A Disease Prevention Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.普通公众能否在患者偏好研究中代表“高危”群体?类风湿关节炎疾病预防的一个例子。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Feb;44(2):189-202. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231218265. Epub 2024 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
An investigation of the convergent validity and test-retest reliability of three uncertainty preference measures.三种不确定性偏好测量方法的收敛效度与重测信度研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 9;57(8):221. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02729-9.
2
Relative Deprivation: How Subjective Experiences of Income Inequality Influence Risk Preferences.相对剥夺感:收入不平等的主观体验如何影响风险偏好
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(4):425. doi: 10.3390/bs15040425.
3
Overcoming attenuation bias in regressions using polygenic indices.利用多基因指数克服回归中的衰减偏差。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 25;14(1):4473. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40069-4.
4
The role of risk preferences: voluntary health insurance in rural Tanzania.风险偏好的作用:坦桑尼亚农村地区的自愿健康保险
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Apr 1;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00432-z.
5
Risk capacity and investment priority as moderators in the relationship between big-five personality factors and investment behavior: a conditional moderated moderated-mediation model.作为大五人格因素与投资行为关系调节变量的风险承受能力和投资优先级:一个条件性双重调节中介模型
Qual Quant. 2023;57(3):2091-2123. doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01429-2. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
Genetic testing users in Italy and Germany: Health orientation, health-related habits, and psychological profile.意大利和德国的基因检测使用者:健康取向、与健康相关的习惯和心理特征。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2022 Mar;10(3):e1851. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1851. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
7
Heterogeneity in Expectations, Risk Tolerance, and Household Stock Shares: The Attenuation Puzzle.预期、风险承受能力与家庭股票份额的异质性:衰减难题。
J Bus Econ Stat. 2020;38(3):633-646. doi: 10.1080/07350015.2018.1549560. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
Stability of Experimental and Survey Measures of Risk, Time, and Social Preferences: A Review and Some New Results.风险、时间和社会偏好的实验与调查测量的稳定性:综述及一些新结果
J Dev Econ. 2015 Nov;117:151-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
9
COGNITIVE ECONOMICS.认知经济学
Jpn Econ Rev (Oxf). 2015 Jun;66(2):167-181. doi: 10.1111/jere.12070. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
Modelling household finances: A Bayesian approach to a multivariate two-part model.家庭财务建模:多元两部分模型的贝叶斯方法
J Empir Finance. 2015 Sep;33:190-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

从调查回复中估算风险承受能力。

Imputing Risk Tolerance From Survey Responses.

作者信息

Kimball Miles S, Sahm Claudia R, Shapiro Matthew D

机构信息

Miles S. Kimball and Matthew D. Shapiro are Professors, Department of Economics, and Research Professors, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, and Research Associates, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138. Claudia R. Sahm is Economist, Division of Research and Statistics, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC 20551.

出版信息

J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Sep 1;103(483):1028-1038. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000139.

DOI:10.1198/016214508000000139
PMID:20407599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2856097/
Abstract

Economic theory assigns a central role to risk preferences. This article develops a measure of relative risk tolerance using responses to hypothetical income gambles in the Health and Retirement Study. In contrast to most survey measures that produce an ordinal metric, this article shows how to construct a cardinal proxy for the risk tolerance of each survey respondent. The article also shows how to account for measurement error in estimating this proxy and how to obtain consistent regression estimates despite the measurement error. The risk tolerance proxy is shown to explain differences in asset allocation across households.

摘要

经济理论赋予风险偏好核心地位。本文利用《健康与退休研究》中对假设性收入赌博的回答,开发了一种相对风险承受能力的度量方法。与大多数产生序数度量的调查方法不同,本文展示了如何为每个调查受访者的风险承受能力构建一个基数代理指标。本文还展示了在估计这个代理指标时如何考虑测量误差,以及如何在存在测量误差的情况下获得一致的回归估计。结果表明,风险承受能力代理指标能够解释家庭资产配置的差异。