Mellström G A
Department of Occupational Dermatology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Solna, Sweden.
Ann Occup Hyg. 1991 Apr;35(2):167-80. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/35.2.167.
ASTM and ISO/DIS test cells were used for permeation testing according to the procedure proposed in draft international standard ISO/DIS 6259. Two compounds, toluene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, were tested with one neoprene glove and one made of a specially prepared Neoprene material. Different open-loop systems, direct-flow measurement and a sampling system with different gas flow rates were compared, and the effects on the test result were evaluated. The initial breakthrough (BTT) times and cumulative breakthrough times (lag-BTT) were significantly influenced only by the measurement systems. Neither cell configuration nor changes in the gas flow rate influenced them to any degree relevant for comparison of the test values on a relative basis in most cases. The permeation rates (PER) and the cumulative amount permeating per cm2 in 60 min showed significant differences between measuring systems, gas flow rates and the ASTM vs the ISO/DIS test procedures.
根据国际标准草案ISO/DIS 6259中提出的程序,使用ASTM和ISO/DIS测试池进行渗透测试。用一只氯丁橡胶手套和一只由特殊制备的氯丁橡胶材料制成的手套对甲苯和1,1,1 - 三氯乙烷两种化合物进行了测试。比较了不同的开环系统、直流测量和具有不同气体流速的采样系统,并评估了它们对测试结果的影响。初始突破(BTT)时间和累积突破时间(滞后 - BTT)仅受测量系统的显著影响。在大多数情况下,电池配置和气体流速的变化对它们的影响程度均与在相对基础上比较测试值无关。测量系统、气体流速以及ASTM与ISO/DIS测试程序之间,渗透速率(PER)和60分钟内每平方厘米的累积渗透量存在显著差异。