• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《健康伙伴量表的内部一致性和结构有效性:一种患者自评的慢性病自我管理测量工具的验证》。

The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure.

机构信息

Centre for Regional Engagement, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Whyalla, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2010 Sep;19(7):1079-85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9661-1. Epub 2010 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-010-9661-1
PMID:20437206
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to test the internal consistency and construct validity of the revised 12-item self-rated Partners in Health (PIH) scale used to assess patients' chronic condition self-management knowledge and behaviours.

METHODS

Baseline PIH data were collected for a total of 294 patients with a range of co-morbid chronic conditions including diabetes, cardiovascular disease and arthritis. Scale data for the initial sample of 176 patients were analysed for internal consistency and construct validity using Reliability Analysis and Factor Analysis. Construct validity was tested in a separate sample of 118 patients using confirmatory factor analysis and a structural equation model.

RESULTS

Good internal consistency was indicated with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.82 in the initial sample. Factor analysis for this sample revealed four key factors (knowledge, coping, management of condition and adherence to treatment) across the twelve items of the scale. These four key factors were then confirmed by applying the exploratory structural equation model to the separate sample.

CONCLUSION

The PIH scale exhibits construct validity and internal consistency. It therefore is both a generic self-rated clinical tool for assessing self-management in a range of chronic conditions as well as an outcome measure to compare populations and change in patient self-management knowledge and behaviour over time. The four domains of self-management provide a valid measure of patient competency in relation to the self-management of their chronic condition(s).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验经修订的 12 项自评 Partners in Health(PIH)量表的内部一致性和结构效度,该量表用于评估患者慢性病自我管理知识和行为。

方法

共纳入 294 例患有多种合并慢性病(包括糖尿病、心血管疾病和关节炎)的患者,收集其基线 PIH 数据。对 176 例初始样本患者的量表数据进行可靠性分析和因子分析,以评估内部一致性和结构效度。在另一个 118 例患者的样本中,采用验证性因子分析和结构方程模型来检验结构效度。

结果

在初始样本中,Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.82,表明具有良好的内部一致性。该样本的因子分析揭示了该量表 12 个项目中的四个关键因素(知识、应对、病情管理和治疗依从性)。然后,通过在另一个样本中应用探索性结构方程模型,验证了这四个关键因素。

结论

PIH 量表具有结构效度和内部一致性。因此,它既是一种通用的自评临床工具,可用于评估多种慢性病的自我管理,也是一种比较不同人群以及患者自我管理知识和行为随时间变化的结果测量工具。自我管理的四个领域为患者在慢性病自我管理方面的能力提供了有效的衡量标准。

相似文献

1
The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure.《健康伙伴量表的内部一致性和结构有效性:一种患者自评的慢性病自我管理测量工具的验证》。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Sep;19(7):1079-85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9661-1. Epub 2010 May 1.
2
Construct Validity of the Dutch Version of the 12-Item Partners in Health Scale: Measuring Patient Self-Management Behaviour and Knowledge in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.荷兰版12项健康伙伴量表的结构效度:测量慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理行为和知识
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161595. eCollection 2016.
3
[Validity, reliability, and acceptability of the brief version of the self-management knowledge, attitude, and behavior assessment scale for diabetes patients].[糖尿病患者自我管理知识、态度和行为评估量表简版的效度、信度和可接受性]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 6;50(7):589-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.07.005.
4
Development and preliminary validation of the chronic hepatitis B self-management scale.慢性乙型肝炎自我管理量表的编制及初步验证。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Jun;41:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale.澳大利亚社区慢性病自我管理的测量:修订版健康伙伴(PIH)量表的因子结构
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jan;26(1):149-159. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1368-5. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
6
Item selection, scaling and construct validation of the Patient-Reported Inventory of Self-Management of Chronic Conditions (PRISM-CC) measurement tool in adults.患者报告的慢性病自我管理量表(PRISM-CC)在成人中的项目选择、定标和结构效度验证。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2867-2880. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03165-4. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
The French adaptation and validation of the Partners in Health (PIH) scale among patients with chronic conditions seen in primary care.在初级保健中观察到的慢性病患者中,对健康伙伴(PIH)量表进行了法语改编和验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0224191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224191. eCollection 2019.
9
Validation of the "Good2Go": the first French-language transition readiness questionnaire.验证“Good2Go”:第一个法语过渡准备问卷。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Jan;179(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03450-4. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the HIV Self-Management Scale in Patients with HIV.HIV感染者中韩文版HIV自我管理量表的心理测量学特性
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015 Jun;45(3):439-48. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.439.

引用本文的文献

1
The complex relationship between treatment burden of multimorbidity and self-care in multimorbid patients with hypertension.高血压多病共患患者中,多种疾病治疗负担与自我护理之间的复杂关系。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02916-9.
2
Effects of a mobile health coaching intervention on symptom experience, self-management, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A quasi-experimental study.移动健康指导干预对乳腺癌幸存者症状体验、自我管理及生活质量的影响:一项准实验研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 21;104(12):e41894. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041894.
3
Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Partners in Health Scale: Chronic Disease Self-Management in Primary Healthcare.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
Self-management support and training for patients with chronic and complex conditions improves health-related behaviour and health outcomes.为患有慢性和复杂疾病的患者提供自我管理支持与培训,可改善与健康相关的行为及健康状况。
Aust Health Rev. 2008 May;32(2):330-8. doi: 10.1071/ah080330.
3
Where is the patient in diabetes performance measures? The case for including patient-centered and self-management measures.
《健康伙伴量表土耳其语版的心理测量学特性:初级医疗保健中的慢性病自我管理》
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Apr;31(2):e70007. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70007.
4
Implementing the Nurse-Led Optimization of Volume and Blood Pressure - Enabling at Multi-Levels Using Technology Program for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.实施护士主导的容量和血压优化——利用技术方案在多层次实现慢性肾脏病管理:一项前瞻性队列研究
Nephron. 2025;149(7):422-434. doi: 10.1159/000543948. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
5
Development and Validation of the Self-Management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization.接受血管腔内血运重建术的下肢动脉疾病患者自我管理问卷的编制与验证
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Dec 21;15:301-314. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S493159. eCollection 2024.
6
Validation of Psychometric Properties of Partners in Health Scale for Heart Failure.心力衰竭健康伴侣量表心理测量学特性的验证
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 3;13(23):7374. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237374.
7
Instruments for measuring self-management and self-care in geriatric patients - a scoping review.用于测量老年患者自我管理和自我护理的工具 - 范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 15;11:1284350. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1284350. eCollection 2023.
8
Pilot randomized controlled trial of a brief strategy to prevent suicide after discharge from residential addiction treatment.住院戒毒治疗出院后预防自杀的简短策略的初步随机对照试验。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Nov;154:209156. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209156. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
9
Comparison of short and long forms of the Flinders program of chronic disease SELF-management for participants starting SGLT-2 inhibitors for congestive heart failure (SELFMAN-HF): protocol for a prospective, observational study.针对开始使用SGLT-2抑制剂治疗充血性心力衰竭的参与者的弗林德斯慢性病自我管理计划的简短和长期形式比较(SELFMAN-HF):一项前瞻性观察性研究的方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 12;10:1059735. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1059735. eCollection 2023.
10
The Personalized Priority and Progress Questionnaire (PPPQ): A personalized instrument for quality of life and self-management for use in clinical trials and practice.《个性化优先级和进展问卷(PPPQ)》:一种个性化的生活质量和自我管理工具,用于临床试验和实践。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Oct;32(10):2789-2803. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03429-7. Epub 2023 May 12.
糖尿病绩效评估中的患者处于什么位置?纳入以患者为中心和自我管理措施的理由。
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):1046-50. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1845.
4
Implementing chronic disease self-management in community settings: lessons from Australian demonstration projects.在社区环境中实施慢性病自我管理:澳大利亚示范项目的经验教训。
Aust Health Rev. 2007 Nov;31(4):499-509; discussion 498. doi: 10.1071/ah070499.
5
SA HealthPlus: a controlled trial of a statewide application of a generic model of chronic illness care.南澳大利亚州健康加号项目:一项关于慢性病照护通用模式在全州应用的对照试验。
Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):37-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00476.x.
6
Health reform through coordinated care: SA HealthPlus.通过协调护理进行医疗改革:南澳健康加计划。
BMJ. 2005 Mar 19;330(7492):662-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.662.
7
A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.因子分析中因子数量的基本原理与检验
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447.
8
Beyond community-based diabetes management and the COAG coordinated care trial.超越基于社区的糖尿病管理和澳大利亚政府理事会协调护理试验。
Aust J Rural Health. 2003 Jun;11(3):131-7.
9
The impact of coordinated care: Eyre region, South Australia 1997-1999.协调护理的影响:南澳大利亚艾尔地区,1997 - 1999年
Aust J Rural Health. 2001 Apr;9(2):69-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1584.2001.00319.x.