van der Meijden O A J, Broeders I A M J, Schijven M P
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Center Alkmaar Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Surg Technol Int. 2010 Apr;19:51-8.
The aim of the study was to determine if the concept of face and construct validity may apply to the SurgicalSim Educational Platform (SEP) "robot" simulator. The SEP robot simulator is a virtual reality (VR) simulator aiming to train users on the Da Vinci Surgical System. To determine the SEP's face validity, two questionnaires were constructed. First, a questionnaire was sent to users of the Da Vinci system (reference group) to determine a focused user-group opinion and their recommendations concerning VR-based training applications for robotic surgery. Next, clinical specialists were requested to complete a pre-tested face validity questionnaire after performing a suturing task on the SEP robot simulator. To determine the SEP's construct validity, outcome parameters of the suturing task were compared, for example, relative to participants' endoscopic experience. Correlations between endoscopic experience and outcome parameters of the performed suturing task were tested for significance. On an ordinal five-point, scale the average score for the quality of the simulator software was 3.4; for its hardware, 3.0. Over 80% agreed that it is important to train surgeons and surgical trainees to use the Da Vinci. There was a significant but marginal difference in tool tip trajectory (p = 0.050) and a nonsignificant difference in total procedure time (p = 0.138) in favor of the experienced group. In conclusion, the results of this study reflect a uniform positive opinion using VR training in robotic surgery. Concepts of face and construct validity of the SEP robotic simulator are present; however, these are not strong and need to be improved before implementation of the SEP robotic simulator in its present state for a validated training curriculum to be successful .
本研究的目的是确定表面效度和结构效度的概念是否适用于外科模拟教育平台(SEP)“机器人”模拟器。SEP机器人模拟器是一种虚拟现实(VR)模拟器,旨在培训用户使用达芬奇手术系统。为了确定SEP的表面效度,构建了两份问卷。首先,向达芬奇系统的用户(参考组)发送一份问卷,以确定目标用户群体的意见及其对基于VR的机器人手术训练应用的建议。其次,要求临床专家在SEP机器人模拟器上完成缝合任务后,填写一份经过预测试的表面效度问卷。为了确定SEP的结构效度,比较了缝合任务的结果参数,例如,相对于参与者的内镜经验。测试了内镜经验与所执行缝合任务的结果参数之间的相关性是否具有显著性。在一个五级量表上,模拟器软件质量的平均得分为3.4;其硬件的平均得分为3.0。超过80%的人认为培训外科医生和外科实习生使用达芬奇系统很重要。在工具尖端轨迹方面存在显著但微小的差异(p = 0.050),在总手术时间方面存在不显著的差异(p = 0.138),有利于经验丰富的组。总之,本研究结果反映了在机器人手术中使用VR训练的一致积极意见。SEP机器人模拟器存在表面效度和结构效度的概念;然而,这些效度并不强,在以当前状态实施SEP机器人模拟器以实现经过验证的培训课程成功之前,需要加以改进。