• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就业关系和健康不平等的宏观模型。

A macro-level model of employment relations and health inequalities.

机构信息

Social Policy and Prevention Research Department, Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, Toronto.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):215-21. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.c.

DOI:10.2190/HS.40.2.c
PMID:20440966
Abstract

The authors develop a macro-social theoretical framework to explain how employment and working conditions affect health inequalities. The theoretical framework represents the social origins and health consequences of various forms of employment conditions. The emphasis is thus on determinants and consequences of employment conditions, not on social determinants of health in general. The framework tries to make sense of the complex link between macro-social power relations among employers, government, and workers' organizations, labor market and social policies, employment and working conditions, and the health of workers. It also suggests further testing of hypothetical causal pathways not covered in the literature. This macro-social theoretical framework might help identify the main "entry points" through which to implement policies and interventions to reduce employment-related health inequalities. The theoretical framework should be approached from a historical perspective.

摘要

作者制定了一个宏观社会理论框架,用以解释就业和工作条件如何影响健康不平等。该理论框架代表了各种形式的就业条件的社会起源和健康后果。因此,重点是就业条件的决定因素和后果,而不是一般的健康社会决定因素。该框架试图理解雇主、政府和工人组织之间的宏观社会权力关系、劳动力市场和社会政策、就业和工作条件以及工人健康之间复杂的联系。它还建议进一步检验文献中未涵盖的假设因果途径。这个宏观社会理论框架可以帮助确定实施政策和干预措施以减少与就业相关的健康不平等的主要“切入点”。应该从历史的角度来探讨这个理论框架。

相似文献

1
A macro-level model of employment relations and health inequalities.就业关系和健康不平等的宏观模型。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):215-21. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.c.
2
Unemployment, informal work, precarious employment, child labor, slavery, and health inequalities: pathways and mechanisms.失业、非正规工作、不稳定就业、童工、奴役和健康不平等:途径和机制。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):281-95. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.h.
3
A micro-level model of employment relations and health inequalities.就业关系与健康不平等的微观水平模型。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):223-7. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.d.
4
Conclusions and recommendations for the study of employment relations and health inequalities.就业关系与健康不平等研究的结论和建议。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):315-22. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.k.
5
Introduction to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health Employment Conditions Network (EMCONET) study, with a glossary on employment relations.世卫组织卫生从业人员状况社会决定因素委员会(EMCONET)研究介绍,附有就业关系词汇表。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):195-207. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.a.
6
Policies and interventions on employment relations and health inequalities.就业关系和健康不平等方面的政策和干预措施。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):297-307. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.i.
7
Six employment conditions and health inequalities: a descriptive overview.六种就业条件与健康不平等:描述性概述。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):269-80. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.g.
8
The solution space: developing research and policy agendas to eliminate employment-related health inequalities.解决方案空间:制定研究和政策议程,以消除与就业相关的健康不平等。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):309-14. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.j.
9
Employment relations and global health: a typological study of world labor markets.雇佣关系与全球健康:世界劳动力市场的类型学研究。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):229-53. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.e.
10
Case studies on employment-related health inequalities in countries representing different types of labor markets.不同类型劳动力市场国家中与就业相关的健康不平等案例研究。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):255-67. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.f.

引用本文的文献

1
Immigrant workers in the meat industry during COVID-19: comparing governmental protection in Germany, the Netherlands, and the USA.新冠疫情期间肉类行业的移民工人:比较德国、荷兰和美国的政府保护措施
Global Health. 2025 Mar 22;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01104-9.
2
Precarious work on the rise.不稳定工作呈上升趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):2074. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19363-3.
3
Precarious Employment and Subjective Career Success During the School-to-Work Transition.从学校到工作过渡期间的不稳定就业与主观职业成功
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jun 27;16:2327-2339. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S418017. eCollection 2023.
4
Health care workers and migrant health: Pre- and post-COVID-19 considerations for reviewing and expanding the research agenda.医护人员与移民健康:新冠疫情前后对审查和扩展研究议程的考量
J Migr Health. 2021 May 24;4:100048. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100048. eCollection 2021.
5
Do flexicurity policies protect workers from the adverse health consequences of temporary employment? A cross-national comparative analysis.灵活保障政策能否保护工人免受临时就业带来的不良健康后果?一项跨国比较分析。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Sep 14;2:674-682. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.005. eCollection 2016 Dec.