Korea University College of Health Sciences, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(2):229-53. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.2.e.
In this study, the authors investigate the global labor market and employment relations, which are central building blocks of the welfare state; the aim is to propose a global typology of labor markets to explain global inequalities in population health. Countries are categorized into core (21), semi-peripheral (42), and peripheral (71) countries, based on gross national product per capita (Atlas method). Labor market-related variables and factors are then used to generate clusters of countries with principal components and cluster analysis methods. The authors then examine the relationship between the resulting clusters and health outcomes. The clusters of countries are largely geographically defined, each cluster with similar historical background and developmental strategy. However, there are interesting exceptions, which warrant further elaboration. The relationship between health outcomes and clusters largely follows the authors' expectations (except for communicable diseases): more egalitarian labor institutions have better health outcomes. The world system, then, can be divided according to different types of labor markets that are predictive of population health outcomes at each level of economic development. As is the case for health and social policies, variability in labor market characteristics is likely to reflect, in part, the relative strength of a country's political actors.
在这项研究中,作者研究了全球劳动力市场和就业关系,它们是福利国家的核心组成部分;旨在提出一种全球劳动力市场类型学,以解释人口健康方面的全球不平等现象。根据人均国民生产总值(Atlas 法),将各国分为核心(21 个)、半外围(42 个)和外围(71 个)国家。然后,使用与劳动力市场相关的变量和因素,利用主成分和聚类分析方法生成国家集群。然后,作者研究了由此产生的集群与健康结果之间的关系。国家集群在很大程度上是按地理位置定义的,每个集群都有相似的历史背景和发展战略。然而,也有一些有趣的例外情况,值得进一步阐述。健康结果与集群之间的关系在很大程度上符合作者的预期(传染病除外):更平等的劳动力制度会产生更好的健康结果。然后,可以根据不同类型的劳动力市场,将世界体系划分为不同的类型,这些市场可以预测每个经济发展水平的人口健康结果。就健康和社会政策而言,劳动力市场特征的差异可能在一定程度上反映了一个国家政治行为体的相对实力。