Faisal Mohammed, Fathy Hamada, Shaban Hamdy, Abuelela Sameh T, Marie Ahmed, Khaled Islam
Surgical Oncology Unit, Department Of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Circular Road, Ismailia, 411522 Egypt.
Patient Saf Surg. 2018 May 17;12:8. doi: 10.1186/s13037-018-0155-3. eCollection 2018.
Seroma is the most frequent postoperative complication following breast cancer surgery. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of the harmonic focus scalpel versus electrocautery in reducing seroma formation post-mastectomy and axillary clearance.
A prospective randomized controlled trial study was conducted at the Department of Surgery of Suez Canal University Hospital from April 26th 2014 to 30th June 2016. Seventy-two women, in whom a mastectomy and axillary clearance for breast cancer were performed, were randomly allocated to either harmonic dissection ( = 36) or electrocautery ( = 36).
The mean operative time was significantly longer for harmonic dissection compared with electrocautery (2.63 ± 0.41 vs. 1.75 ± 0.26 h; < 0.0001). In addition, a significantly smaller amount of intraoperative blood loss (69.4 ± 25.1 vs. 255.5 ± 41.6 ml; = 0.002) and total drainage volume (1277.8 ± 172.5 ml vs. 3300 ± 167.5 ml; = 0.002) were found in the harmonic group. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the time of drain removal (10.9 ± 1.12 vs. 15.9 ± 1.44; = 0.001) and the incidence of seroma formation after drain removal [8.3% vs 33.3%; = 0.003] in the harmonic group compared with those in the electrocautery group.
Harmonic dissection technique leads to significant decreases in intraoperative blood loss, total drainage volume and postoperative seroma in terms of shorter drain duration with a minimal increase in the operative time and better quality of life. Here, we recommend the use of the harmonic dissection technique in mastectomy and axillary clearance.
血清肿是乳腺癌手术后最常见的术后并发症。我们的目的是评估谐波聚焦手术刀与电灼术在减少乳房切除术后和腋窝清扫术后血清肿形成方面的效果。
2014年4月26日至2016年6月30日在苏伊士运河大学医院外科进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验研究。72名接受乳腺癌乳房切除术和腋窝清扫术的女性被随机分配至谐波解剖组(n = 36)或电灼术组(n = 36)。
与电灼术相比,谐波解剖的平均手术时间明显更长(2.63±0.41 vs. 1.75±0.26小时;P < 0.0001)。此外,谐波组术中失血量(69.4±25.1 vs. 255.5±41.6毫升;P = 0.002)和总引流量(1277.8±172.5毫升 vs. 3300±167.5毫升;P = 0.002)明显更少。而且,与电灼术组相比,谐波组引流管拔除时间(10.9±1.12 vs. 15.9±1.44;P = 0.001)以及引流管拔除后血清肿形成的发生率[8.3% vs 33.3%;P = 0.003]显著降低。
谐波解剖技术可显著减少术中失血量、总引流量和术后血清肿,引流持续时间更短,手术时间增加极少,生活质量更高。在此,我们推荐在乳房切除术和腋窝清扫术中使用谐波解剖技术。