Safety Assessment, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080, USA.
Toxicol Sci. 2010 Sep;117(1):4-16. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq134. Epub 2010 May 6.
In the drive to develop drugs with well-characterized and clinically monitorable safety profiles, there is incentive to expand the repertoire of safety biomarkers for toxicities without routine markers or premonitory detection. Biomarkers in blood are pursued because of specimen accessibility, opportunity for serial monitoring, quantitative measurement, and the availability of assay platforms. Cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors (here referred to collectively as cytokines) show robust modulation in proximal events of inflammation, immune response, and repair. These are key general processes in many toxicities; therefore, cytokines are commonly identified during biomarker discovery studies. In addition, multiplexed cytokine immunoassays are easily applied to biomarker discovery and routine toxicity studies to measure blood cytokines. However, cytokines pose several challenges as safety biomarkers because of a short serum half-life; low to undetectable baseline levels; lack of tissue-specific or toxicity-specific expression; complexities related to cytokine expression with multiorgan involvement; and species, strain, and interindividual differences. Additional challenges to their application are caused by analytical, methodological, and study design-related variables. A final consideration is the strength of the relationship between changes in cytokine levels and the development of phenotypic or functional manifestations of toxicity. These factors should inform the integrated judgment-based qualification of novel biomarkers in preclinical, and potentially clinical, risk assessment. The dearth of robust, predictive cytokine biomarkers for specific toxicities is an indication of the significant complexity of these challenges. This review will consider the current state of the science and recommendations for appropriate application of cytokines in preclinical safety assessment.
在开发具有明确特征和临床可监测安全性的药物的过程中,存在激励因素来扩大毒性的安全生物标志物的 repertoire,而无需常规标志物或先兆检测。因为标本易于获取、有机会进行连续监测、定量测量以及有检测平台,所以人们致力于研究血液中的生物标志物。细胞因子、趋化因子和生长因子(这里统称为细胞因子)在炎症、免疫反应和修复的近端事件中表现出强烈的调节作用。这些是许多毒性中的关键一般过程;因此,在生物标志物发现研究中通常会识别细胞因子。此外,多重细胞因子免疫测定法易于应用于生物标志物发现和常规毒性研究,以测量血液中的细胞因子。然而,细胞因子作为安全性生物标志物存在一些挑战,因为它们的血清半衰期短;基础水平低至无法检测;缺乏组织特异性或毒性特异性表达;与多器官参与相关的细胞因子表达的复杂性;以及物种、品系和个体间的差异。分析、方法学和研究设计相关变量也给它们的应用带来了额外的挑战。最后一个考虑因素是细胞因子水平变化与毒性表型或功能表现发展之间关系的强度。这些因素应告知基于综合判断的新型生物标志物在临床前和潜在临床风险评估中的资格。缺乏针对特定毒性的稳健、可预测的细胞因子生物标志物表明这些挑战具有显著的复杂性。本综述将考虑当前的科学状况,并就细胞因子在临床前安全性评估中的适当应用提出建议。