三种人格病理学自我报告测量方法的比较
Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology.
作者信息
Okada Mayumi, Oltmanns Thomas F
机构信息
Washington University in St. Louis.
出版信息
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009 Dec;31(4):358-367. doi: 10.1007/s10862-009-9130-8.
Abstract
Levels of convergence among three measures of personality pathology, the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders Questionnaire (SCID-IIQ) and the Multi-source Assessment of Personality Pathology (MAPP) were examined. Each questionnaire was administered three times in an alternating sequence over nine consecutive weekdays to a sample of college students. There was some degree of convergence among the three instruments, but there were also substantial empirical differences between them. The data suggest three related conclusions: (1) in general, the self-report version of the MAPP is more conservative than the other two questionnaires, (2) these questionnaires should not be considered interchangeable measures of the same constructs, and (3) the breadth of measurement provided varies as a function of both the questionnaire and the specific personality disorder being measured.
摘要
研究了三种人格病理学测量方法之间的收敛程度，这三种方法分别是人格诊断问卷-4+（PDQ-4+）、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴II人格障碍结构化临床访谈问卷（SCID-IIQ）和人格病理学多源评估（MAPP）。在连续九个工作日里，以交替顺序对一组大学生样本进行了三次问卷调查，每次使用一种问卷。这三种工具之间存在一定程度的收敛，但它们之间也存在显著的实证差异。数据表明了三个相关结论：（1）一般来说，MAPP的自我报告版本比其他两份问卷更为保守；（2）不应将这些问卷视为同一结构的可互换测量方法；（3）所提供测量的广度因问卷和所测量的特定人格障碍而异。
相似文献
1
Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology.
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009 Dec;31(4):358-367. doi: 10.1007/s10862-009-9130-8.
2
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
3
A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) With the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in Predicting the General Level of Personality Pathology Among Community Dwelling Subjects.
J Pers Disord. 2016;30(1):82-94. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2105_29_184. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
4
A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) With the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) in Predicting the General Level of Personality Pathology Among Community Dwelling Subjects.
J Pers Disord. 2016 Feb;30(1):82-94. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_184.
5
Borderline personality-bipolar spectrum relationship.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;30(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
6
Brief communication: criterion validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+) in a mixed psychiatric sample.
J Pers Disord. 1998 Summer;12(2):172-8. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1998.12.2.172.
7
Correspondence between self-report and interview-based assessments of antisocial personality disorder.
Psychol Assess. 2008 Mar;20(1):47-54. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.47.
8
Results of the search for personality disorder screening tools: clinical implications.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;73(2):165-73. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07067.
9
Interview-based ratings of DSM-IV Axis II/DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorder symptoms in consecutively admitted insomnia patients: A comparison study with consecutively admitted psychotherapy patients matched on age and gender.
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;87:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
Relationship of the Borderline Symptom List to DSM-IV borderline personality disorder criteria assessed by semi-structured interview.
Psychopathology. 2009;42(6):394-8. doi: 10.1159/000241195. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
引用本文的文献
1
The Impact of Personality Pathology Across Three Generations: Evidence from the St. Louis Personality and Intergenerational Network Study.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;9(5):900-918. doi: 10.1177/2167702621989665. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Effects of Social Exclusion on Effortful Control and Mentalizing in relation to Borderline Personality Features.
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 26;8(1):14400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32775-7.
3
Affective instability predicts the course of depression in late middle-age and older adulthood.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 15;239:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.038. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Borderline personality pathology and physical health: The role of employment.
Personal Disord. 2018 Jan;9(1):73-80. doi: 10.1037/per0000211. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
5
Dialectical behavior therapy skills use and emotion dysregulation in personality disorders and psychopathy: a community self-report study.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2016 Jul 20;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s40479-016-0041-5. eCollection 2016.
6
A clinical measure of suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and associated symptoms in bipolar disorder: Psychometric properties of the Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR).
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Dec;71:126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
The Role of Metaperception in Personality Disorders: Do People with Personality Problems Know How Others Experience Their Personality?
J Pers Disord. 2015 Aug;29(4):449-67. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.449.
8
Cognitive and Clinical Characteristics of Sexual and Religious Obsessions.
J Cogn Psychother. 2011 Aug 1;25(3):167-176. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.25.3.167.
9
The Relationship of Hoarding Symptoms to Schizotypal Personality and Cognitive Schemas in an OCD Sample.
J Cogn Psychother. 2013 Nov 1;27(4):384-396. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.27.4.384.
10
The relative impact of socioeconomic status and childhood trauma on Black-White differences in paranoid personality disorder symptoms.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Feb;123(1):225-30. doi: 10.1037/a0035258.
本文引用的文献
1
Patients' versus informants' reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1/2-year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders.
Psychol Assess. 2003 Jun;15(2):216-22. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.216.
2
Factorial structure of pathological personality as evaluated by peers.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Feb;112(1):81-91.
3
Implicit partisanship: taking sides for no reason.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;83(2):367-79.
4
The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;58(6):590-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.590.
5
Examination of the screening properties of the personality diagnostic questionnaire 4+ (PDQ-4+) in a prison population.
J Pers Disord. 2001 Apr;15(2):180-94. doi: 10.1521/pedi.15.2.180.19212.
6
Peer assessment of personality traits and pathology in female college students.
Assessment. 1998 Mar;5(1):53-66. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500108.
7
Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: implications for research and the evolution of axis II.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;154(7):895-903. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.7.895.
8
Diagnostic agreement between the SCID-II screening questionnaire and the Personality Disorder Examination.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):428-33. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_4.
9
SCID II interviews and the SCID Screen questionnaire as diagnostic tools for personality disorders in DSM-III-R.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Aug;90(2):120-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01566.x.
10
Diagnosing personality disorders in the community. A comparison of self-report and interview measures.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990 Jun;47(6):527-31. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810180027005.
Zotero 插件