Department of Electrophysiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Oct;21(10):1079-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01773.x.
A robotic navigation system (RNS, Hansen™) has been developed as an alternative method of performing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the growing application of RNS-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its consequences and mechanisms of subsequent AF recurrences are unknown. We investigated the acute procedural success and persistence of PVI over time after robotic PVI and its relation to clinical outcome.
Sixty-four patients (60.7 ± 9.8 years, 53 male) with paroxysmal AF underwent robotic circumferential PVI with 3-dimensional left atrial reconstruction (NavX™). A voluntary repeat invasive electrophysiological study was performed 3 months after ablation irrespective of clinical course. Robotic PVI was successful in all patients without complication (fluoroscopy time: 23.5 [12-34], procedure time: 180 [150-225] minutes). Fluoroscopy time demonstrated a gradual decline but was significantly reduced after the 30th patient following the introduction of additional navigation software (34 [29-45] vs 12 [9-17] minutes; P < 0.001). A repeat study at 3 months was performed in 63% of patients and revealed electrical conduction recovery in 43% of all PVs. Restudied patients without AF recurrence (n = 28) showed a significantly lower number of recovered PVs (1 (0-2) vs 2 (2-3); P = 0.006) and a longer LA-PV conduction delay than patients with AF recurrences (n = 12). Persistent block of all PVs was associated with freedom from AF in all patients. At 3 months, 67% of patients were free of AF, while reablation of recovered PVs led to an overall freedom from AF in 81% of patients after 1 year.
Robotic PVI for PAF is safe, effective, and requires limited fluoroscopy while yielding comparable success rates to conventional ablation approaches with PV reconduction as a common phenomenon associated with AF recurrences.
作为一种治疗心房颤动(房颤)的替代方法,已经开发出一种机器人导航系统(RNS,Hansen 系统)。尽管 RNS 引导的肺静脉隔离(PVI)的应用越来越广泛,但它导致的后果以及随后房颤复发的机制尚不清楚。我们研究了机器人 PVI 后即刻和随时间推移的 PVI 的持续性,并探讨了其与临床结果的关系。
64 例阵发性房颤患者(60.7±9.8 岁,53 例男性)接受了三维左心房重建(NavX 系统)下的机器人环形 PVI。消融后 3 个月,无论临床过程如何,患者均自愿进行重复有创电生理研究。所有患者均成功完成机器人 PVI,无并发症(透视时间:23.5[12-34]分钟,手术时间:180[150-225]分钟)。透视时间逐渐减少,但在引入额外导航软件后,第 30 例患者后显著减少(34[29-45]vs 12[9-17]分钟;P<0.001)。63%的患者进行了 3 个月的重复研究,结果显示所有肺静脉中有 43%恢复了电传导。无房颤复发的重新研究患者(n=28)显示恢复的肺静脉数量明显减少(1(0-2)vs 2(2-3);P=0.006),并且与房颤复发患者相比,左心房-肺静脉传导延迟更长(n=12)。所有肺静脉均持续闭塞与所有患者无房颤相关。3 个月时,67%的患者无房颤,而对恢复的肺静脉进行再消融可使 81%的患者在 1 年后无房颤。
机器人 PVI 治疗阵发性房颤安全、有效,透视时间有限,成功率与传统消融方法相当,但肺静脉再传导是房颤复发的常见现象。