• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其版自我管理的利兹评估神经性症状和体征问卷(S-LANSS)的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Turkish Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Kirikkale University Faculty of Medicine, Kirikkale, Turkey.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2010 Jul;11(7):1107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00837.x. Epub 2010 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00837.x
PMID:20456071
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) is a 7-item self-report scale developed to identify pain of predominantly neuropathic origin. The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the S-LANSS and to test its validity and reliability in chronic pain patients.

METHOD AND PATIENTS

We enrolled 244 chronic pain patients treated at the Neurology Department. The original version of the S-LANSS was translated into Turkish by standard procedures. An independent clinician determined the pain type (neuropathic vs nociceptive). The reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (agreement with the reference diagnosis and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) were determined.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and forty-four patients with chronic pain (167 women, 43.1 +/- 11.4 years), 137, neuropathic pain and 107, nociceptive pain, were asked to complete the S-LANSS twice. Cronbach's alpha-coefficient was 0.74 for the test and 0.73 for the retest. Total S-LANSS scores for subjects did not significantly differ between applications (P = 0.46). Correlation coefficient was r: 0.97 (P < 0.01), which is fairly high for a self-assessment tool. Compared with the clinical assessment, the sensitivity and specificity of the S-LANSS were 72.3% (95% CI, 64.0-79.6%) and 80.4% (95% CI, 71.6-87.4%), respectively, for both the test and retest. The sensitivity and specificity of the Turkish S-LANSS were similar to those determined in the original validation study.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the first validation of a translated version of the S-LANNS into another language. The results suggest that the Turkish version of S-LANSS is a reliable and valid differential diagnostic measure of neuropathic pain in chronic pain patients.

摘要

目的

自我管理的利兹评估神经病理性症状和体征(S-LANSS)是一种 7 项自我报告量表,用于识别主要为神经病理性起源的疼痛。本研究的目的是开发 S-LANSS 的土耳其语版本,并在慢性疼痛患者中测试其有效性和可靠性。

方法和患者

我们招募了 244 名在神经科接受治疗的慢性疼痛患者。S-LANSS 的原始版本通过标准程序翻译成土耳其语。一位独立的临床医生确定疼痛类型(神经病理性与伤害感受性)。确定了可靠性(内部一致性和重测信度)和有效性(与参考诊断的一致性以及敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值)。

结果

244 名慢性疼痛患者(167 名女性,43.1 +/- 11.4 岁),137 名神经病理性疼痛和 107 名伤害感受性疼痛,被要求两次完成 S-LANSS。测试时的克朗巴赫 α 系数为 0.74,重测时为 0.73。两次应用时,受试者的 S-LANSS 总分无显著差异(P = 0.46)。相关系数 r 为 0.97(P < 0.01),对于自我评估工具来说相当高。与临床评估相比,S-LANSS 的敏感性和特异性在测试和重测时分别为 72.3%(95%CI,64.0-79.6%)和 80.4%(95%CI,71.6-87.4%)。土耳其 S-LANSS 的敏感性和特异性与原始验证研究中确定的相似。

结论

本研究报告了将 S-LANSS 翻译成另一种语言的首次验证。结果表明,土耳其语版 S-LANSS 是慢性疼痛患者中神经病理性疼痛的可靠和有效鉴别诊断工具。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Turkish Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire.土耳其版自我管理的利兹评估神经性症状和体征问卷(S-LANSS)的有效性和可靠性。
Pain Med. 2010 Jul;11(7):1107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00837.x. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
2
The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: validation for use in clinical and postal research.用于识别主要为神经病理性疼痛的S-LANSS评分:在临床和邮寄研究中的应用验证
J Pain. 2005 Mar;6(3):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.007.
3
Turkish version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain: a validity and reliability study.疼痛 DETECT 问卷土耳其语版用于评估神经性疼痛的有效性和可靠性研究。
Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1933-43. doi: 10.1111/pme.12222. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
4
Validation of the S-LANSS in the community setting.社区环境中S-LANSS的验证。
Pain. 2007 Nov;132(1-2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.030. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Linguistic adaptation, validation and comparison of 3 routinely used neuropathic pain questionnaires.3 种常用神经性疼痛问卷的语言适应性、验证和比较。
Pain Physician. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):179-86.
6
Brazilian Portuguese validation of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs for patients with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者的莱斯特评估神经性症状和体征问卷(巴西葡萄牙语版)的验证。
Pain Med. 2011 Oct;12(10):1544-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01221.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
7
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的魁北克腰痛残疾量表土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.
8
Translation and linguistic validation of the self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) scale for use in a Libyan population.用于利比亚人群的自我完成的利兹评估神经性症状和体征(S-LANSS)量表的翻译和语言验证。
Pain Pract. 2013 Mar;13(3):198-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00576.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
9
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) and Self-Complete Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) Questionnaires into the Greek Language.将利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估量表(LANSS)及利兹神经病理性症状和体征自评量表(S-LANSS)问卷翻译成希腊语、进行文化调适及验证。
Pain Pract. 2016 Jun;16(5):552-64. doi: 10.1111/papr.12300. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
10
A comparison of the DN4 and LANSS questionnaires in the assessment of neuropathic pain: validity and reliability of the Turkish version of DN4.DN4 与 LANSS 问卷在神经性疼痛评估中的比较:DN4 土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain and lymphedema characteristics of women with breast cancer-related lymphedema with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.患有和未患有2型糖尿病的乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿女性的疼痛和淋巴水肿特征
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 8;33(8):666. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09728-8.
2
Characteristics of pain in patients with NMOSD and MOGAD: impact on mental health, sleep and quality of life.视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)和髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白抗体相关疾病(MOGAD)患者的疼痛特征:对心理健康、睡眠和生活质量的影响。
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08277-6.
3
Evaluation of Complications, Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
糖尿病患者并发症、周围神经性疼痛及睡眠质量的评估
Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70605. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70605.
4
Evaluation of Splint and Exercise Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Insights from Ultrasonographic Measurements.夹板和运动干预腕管综合征的评估:超声测量的见解。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Nov 2;30:e945704. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945704.
5
Ultrasonographic Achilles Tendon Measurements and Static and Dynamic Balance in Prediabetes.超声测量跟腱及糖尿病前期的静态和动态平衡。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 19;60(8):1349. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081349.
6
Pain types and risk factors in post-COVID-19.新冠病毒感染康复后的疼痛类型及风险因素
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 1;70(1):30-38. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.13828. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
The effect of different regional analgesia methods on chronic pain after thoracic surgery.不同区域镇痛方法对胸外科手术后慢性疼痛的影响。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2023 Dec;20(4):233-239. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2023.134175. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
Possible Neuropathic Pain in Clinical Practice-Review on Selected Diagnostic Tools and Its Further Challenges.临床实践中可能存在的神经性疼痛——关于选定诊断工具及其进一步挑战的综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;13(1):108. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010108.
9
Which scale is more useful to detect diabetic neuropathic pain?: A cross-sectional study.哪种量表更有助于检测糖尿病性神经病理性疼痛?:一项横断面研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-00970-3.
10
Neuropathic Pain Frequency in Neurology Outpatients: A Multicenter Study.神经病学门诊患者的神经性疼痛发生率:一项多中心研究。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Nov 15;58(4):257-260. doi: 10.29399/npa.27549. eCollection 2021.