Järvholm U, Palmerud G, Karlsson D, Herberts P, Kadefors R
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
J Orthop Res. 1991 Jul;9(4):609-19. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100090418.
Estimations of shoulder muscle load are important in biomechanic and ergonomic research. We have studied shoulder muscle load in the trapezius (six subjects), deltoid (six subjects), infraspinatus (eight subjects), and supraspinatus (seven subjects) muscles with simultaneous intramuscular pressure (IMP) and intramuscular bipolar electromyography (EMG) recordings. For imposition of shoulder muscle load, the arm was positioned in abduction or flexion with different hand loads (0, 1, or 2 kg), or isometric force registrations were performed. The microcapillary infusion technique was used for IMP recordings. The IMP in the supra- and infraspinatus muscles were high compared with the trapezius and deltoid muscles in abducted arm positions. In all test situations, IMP and EMG gave a similar description of local muscle load. IMP at maximal voluntary contraction was highest in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Both IMP and EMG in all four muscles showed an almost linear correlation to recorded isometric external force. The difference in IMP between shoulder muscles in the same arm position may be due to muscle anatomy, muscle function, and compliance of surrounding tissues. Because a high IMP may impede muscle blood flow, our findings may possibly explain the physiological stress on the rotator cuff muscles as compared with the deltoid and trapezius muscles in work with elevated arms.
肩部肌肉负荷的评估在生物力学和人体工程学研究中很重要。我们通过同步进行肌内压力(IMP)和肌内双极肌电图(EMG)记录,研究了斜方肌(6名受试者)、三角肌(6名受试者)、冈下肌(8名受试者)和冈上肌(7名受试者)的肩部肌肉负荷。为了施加肩部肌肉负荷,将手臂置于外展或屈曲位置,并施加不同的手部负荷(0、1或2千克),或者进行等长力记录。采用微毛细管灌注技术进行IMP记录。在外展手臂位置时,冈上肌和冈下肌的IMP高于斜方肌和三角肌。在所有测试情况下,IMP和EMG对局部肌肉负荷的描述相似。最大自主收缩时,冈上肌和冈下肌的IMP最高。所有四块肌肉的IMP和EMG与记录的等长外力均呈几乎线性相关。同一手臂位置的肩部肌肉之间IMP的差异可能归因于肌肉解剖结构、肌肉功能以及周围组织的顺应性。由于高IMP可能会阻碍肌肉血流,我们的研究结果可能有助于解释与三角肌和斜方肌相比,在举高手臂工作时肩袖肌所承受的生理压力。