Suppr超能文献

书籍的面部(及鼻子)启动效应:语义记忆的可塑性

Face (and nose) priming for book: the malleability of semantic memory.

作者信息

Coane Jennifer H, Balota David A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Colby College, Waterville, ME 04901, USA.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2011;58(1):62-70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000068.

Abstract

There are two general classes of models of semantic structure that support semantic priming effects. Feature-overlap models of semantic priming assume that shared features between primes and targets are critical (e.g., cat-DOG). Associative accounts assume that contextual co-occurrence is critical and that the system is organized along associations independent of featural overlap (e.g., leash-DOG). If unrelated concepts can become related as a result of contextual co-occurrence, this would be more supportive of associative accounts and provide insight into the nature of the network underlying "semantic" priming effects. Naturally co-occurring recent associations (e.g., face-BOOK) were tested under conditions that minimize strategic influences (i.e., short stimulus onset asynchrony and low relatedness proportion) in a semantic priming paradigm. Priming for new associations did not differ from the priming found for pre-existing relations (e.g., library-BOOK). Mediated priming (e.g., nose-BOOK) was also found. These results suggest that contextual associations can result in the reorganization of the network that subserves "semantic" priming effects.

摘要

有两类支持语义启动效应的语义结构模型。语义启动的特征重叠模型假定启动刺激和目标刺激之间的共享特征至关重要(例如,猫-狗)。联想理论则认为情境共现至关重要,且该系统是沿着独立于特征重叠的联想组织起来的(例如,皮带-狗)。如果不相关的概念能够因情境共现而变得相关,这将更支持联想理论,并有助于深入了解“语义”启动效应背后网络的本质。在语义启动范式中,在将策略性影响降至最低的条件下(即短刺激呈现间隔和低相关比例),测试了自然共现的近期联想(例如,脸-脸谱网)。对新联想的启动与对既有关系(例如,图书馆-书)的启动并无差异。还发现了中介启动(例如,鼻子-书)。这些结果表明,情境联想能够导致支持“语义”启动效应的网络发生重组。

相似文献

1
Face (and nose) priming for book: the malleability of semantic memory.
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(1):62-70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000068.
2
Integrative and semantic relations equally alleviate age-related associative memory deficits.
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):141-52. doi: 10.1037/a0023924. Epub 2011 May 30.
3
Pure mediated priming: a retrospective semantic matching model.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):135-46. doi: 10.1037/a0017517.
4
Automatic non-associative semantic priming: episodic affective priming of naming responses.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 May;116(1):39-54. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.012.
5
Accessing semantic person knowledge: temporal dynamics of nonstrategic categorical and associative priming.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Feb;23(2):447-59. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21432. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
6
[Schizophrenia and semantic priming effects].
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76139-5.
7
Depth-of-processing effects on semantic activation deficits in schizophrenia: an electrophysiological investigation.
Schizophr Res. 2011 Dec;133(1-3):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
A novel co-occurrence-based approach to predict pure associative and semantic priming.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1488-1493. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1453-6.
9
The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
Psychol Res. 2002 Aug;66(3):180-94. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0086-5. Epub 2002 May 8.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Lay Definitions of Intelligence, Knowledge, and Memory: Inter- and Independence of Constructs.
J Intell. 2023 Apr 28;11(5):84. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050084.
2
How Has COVID-19 Impacted Our Language Use?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13836. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113836.
3
Exposure to co-occurrence regularities in language drives semantic integration of new words.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(7):1064-1081. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001122. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory.
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:668550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668550. eCollection 2021.
5
Gaming experience affects the interpretation of ambiguous words.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243512. eCollection 2020.
6
A novel co-occurrence-based approach to predict pure associative and semantic priming.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1488-1493. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1453-6.
7
Detecting analogies unconsciously.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jan 22;8:9. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00009. eCollection 2014.
8
Integrating events across levels of consciousness.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14;7:68. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00068. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

2
3
The English Lexicon Project.
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03193014.
4
Predicting semantic priming at the item level.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jul;61(7):1036-66. doi: 10.1080/17470210701438111.
5
Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):645-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645.
6
Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things.
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Nov;37(4):547-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03192726.
7
Associating unseen events: semantically mediated formation of episodic associations.
Psychol Sci. 2005 Feb;16(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00797.x.
8
The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195588.
9
Priming for new associations in animacy decision: evidence for context dependency.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Oct;57(7):1211-31. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000738.
10
Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):785-813. doi: 10.3758/bf03196544.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验