Suppr超能文献

视障患者中 Radner 阅读图表的可行性。

Feasibility of the Radner Reading Charts in low-vision patients.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;248(11):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1402-1. Epub 2010 May 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Being unable to read is a major problem for visually impaired patients. Since distance visual acuity (VA) does not adequately reflect reading ability, it is important to also evaluate near VA. The Radner Reading Charts (RRCs) are available to measure patients' reading performance. The present study tested the inter-chart and test-retest reliability of the RRCs in Dutch low-vision patients (i.e., visual acuity ≥0.3 logMAR) with various eye disorders.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients read the three RRCs in random order. Then, about 1 month after the initial measurements, a test-retest procedure was performed in 15 of the 38 patients. Tested variables were reading acuity (logRAD), logRAD score, logRAD/logMAR ratio, maximum reading speed (MRS), and critical print size (CPS). Both MRS and CPS were calculated in two different ways. To determine the variability, a mixed-model analysis was used.

RESULTS

For all variables, the largest part of the variance was explained by the individual subject (86-89%) whereas the chart accounted for only 0-0.78% of the variability. Therefore, the inter-chart and test-retest reliability was high, except for the CPS which had a poor to moderate reliability (31-62%) when calculated in the two different ways.

CONCLUSIONS

The inter-chart and test-retest results showed high reliability in patients with low vision due to various diseases; therefore, the charts are feasible to determine effects in large groups.

摘要

背景

阅读障碍是视障患者面临的主要问题。由于远距视力(VA)并不能充分反映阅读能力,因此评估近距 VA 也很重要。Radner 阅读图表(RRC)可用于测量患者的阅读表现。本研究在患有各种眼病的荷兰低视力患者(即视力≥0.3 logMAR)中测试了 RRC 的图表间和复测可靠性。

方法

38 名患者以随机顺序阅读三张 RRC。大约在初始测量后 1 个月,对 38 名患者中的 15 名进行了复测。测试变量为阅读视力(logRAD)、logRAD 评分、logRAD/logMAR 比值、最大阅读速度(MRS)和临界印刷尺寸(CPS)。MRS 和 CPS 均以两种不同方式进行计算。为了确定变异性,使用混合模型分析。

结果

对于所有变量,个体受试者解释了大部分变异(86-89%),而图表仅占变异的 0-0.78%。因此,图表间和复测可靠性很高,除了以两种不同方式计算时,CPS 的可靠性较差(31-62%)。

结论

由于各种疾病导致的低视力患者的图表间和复测结果显示出较高的可靠性;因此,这些图表可用于确定大样本中的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验