Kasten M J, Allerberger F, Anhalt J P
Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Infection. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):88-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01645574.
The efficiency of three commercially available blood culture systems for isolating Campylobacter sp. was investigated. Thirteen of 189,688 blood cultures from patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1984 through 1990 were positive for Campylobacter sp. Eleven out of 13 blood cultures positive for Campylobacter sp. were part of a complete three bottle set of cultures (Isolator from Du Pont, Roche Septi-Chek from Hoffman-La Roche, and non-vented Tryptic Soy Broth from Difco), none of them providing a specific microaerophilic mileu. The aerobic Roche Septi-Chek seems to be more efficient for the detection of Campylobacter sp. in blood cultures than either the anaerobic Tryptic Soy Broth (Difco) or the Isolator (Du Pont) using the incubator condition of 5% CO2.
对三种市售血液培养系统分离弯曲杆菌属细菌的效率进行了研究。1984年至1990年在梅奥诊所就诊患者的189,688份血培养中，有13份弯曲杆菌属细菌培养阳性。13份弯曲杆菌属细菌培养阳性的血培养中，有11份是完整的三瓶培养组合（杜邦公司的隔离器、霍夫曼 - 罗氏公司的罗氏血培养瓶以及迪夫科公司的非通气胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤）中的一部分，这些培养系统均未提供特定的微需氧环境。在5%二氧化碳的培养箱条件下，需氧的罗氏血培养瓶在血培养中检测弯曲杆菌属细菌似乎比厌氧的胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤（迪夫科公司）或隔离器（杜邦公司）更有效。
