• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验注册和数据透明度立法。

Legislation for trial registration and data transparency.

机构信息

School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2010 May 26;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-64.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-11-64
PMID:20504337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2882906/
Abstract

Public confidence in clinical trials has been eroded by data suppression, misrepresentation and manipulation. Although various attempts have been made to achieve universal trial registration- e.g., Declaration of Helsinki, WHO clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors requirement- they have not succeeded, probably because they lack the enough power of enforcement.Legislation appears to be the most efficient and effective means to ensure that all researchers register their trials and disseminate their data accurately and in a timely manner. We propose that a global network be established. This could be accomplished in two steps. The first step is to legislate about trial registration and data transparency, such as USA's FDAAA Act 2007; and the second step to establish a global network to ensure uniform, international consistency in policy and enforcement of trial registration and data transparency.

摘要

公众对临床试验的信心已经被数据掩盖、歪曲和操纵所削弱。尽管已经做出了各种努力来实现临床试验的全球注册,例如《赫尔辛基宣言》、世界卫生组织临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)、国际医学期刊编辑委员会的要求,但这些努力都没有成功,可能是因为它们缺乏足够的执行力度。立法似乎是确保所有研究人员准确、及时地注册他们的试验并传播他们的数据的最有效和最有效的手段。我们建议建立一个全球网络。这可以分两步完成。第一步是立法规定临床试验注册和数据透明度,例如美国的 FDAAA 法案 2007 年;第二步是建立一个全球网络,以确保在政策和执行临床试验注册和数据透明度方面的统一和国际一致性。

相似文献

1
Legislation for trial registration and data transparency.临床试验注册和数据透明度立法。
Trials. 2010 May 26;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-64.
2
Open-access clinical trial registries: the Italian scenario.开放获取的临床试验注册机构:意大利的情况。
Trials. 2012 Oct 18;13:194. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-194.
3
Trial registration and results disclosure: impact of US legislation on sponsors, investigators, and medical journal editors.试验注册与结果披露:美国立法对申办者、研究者及医学期刊编辑的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jun;24(6):1683-9. doi: 10.1185/03007990802114849. Epub 2008 May 6.
4
Clinical trial regulation in Argentina: overview and analysis of regulatory framework, use of existing tools, and researchers' perspectives to identify potential barriers.阿根廷临床试验法规:监管框架概述与分析、现有工具的使用情况,以及研究人员对潜在障碍的看法。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011 Nov;30(5):445-52. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892011001100007.
5
Compliance with legal requirement to report clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cohort study.遵守在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上报告临床试验结果的法律要求:一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 1;395(10221):361-369. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33220-9. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Quality assessment of clinical trial registration with traditional Chinese medicine in WHO registries.世界卫生组织注册机构中中医药临床试验注册的质量评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025218.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Registration of trials in children: update of current international initiatives.儿童试验注册:当前国际倡议的更新
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Sep;94(9):717-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.148155. Epub 2009 May 19.
9
An audit to evaluate an institute's lead researchers' knowledge of trial registries and to investigate adherence to data transparency issues in an Italian research institute registry.一项评估机构主要研究人员对试验注册知识的审计,以及对一家意大利研究机构注册处数据透明度问题的遵守情况进行调查。
Trials. 2018 Sep 20;19(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2910-2.
10
[In search of lost evidence. Proposals for increasing the transparency of clinical trials].[寻找遗失的证据。提高临床试验透明度的建议]
Med Clin (Barc). 1999;112 Suppl 1:21-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of Clinical Trials of Systemic Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between 2005 and 2024: Based on ClinicalTrials.gov.2005年至2024年肝细胞癌全身治疗临床试验的演变:基于ClinicalTrials.gov
Gastro Hep Adv. 2025 Jun 18;4(10):100725. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100725. eCollection 2025.
2
Comprehensive review of Korean Medicine registries 2015-2023.2015 - 2023年韩国医学注册库综合综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 18;11:1412053. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1412053. eCollection 2024.
3
Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals.与口腔健康期刊中无统计学意义的估计相比,具有统计学显著效果估计的研究更频繁地发表。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01795-3.
4
The characteristics of registered acupuncture clinical trials enrolling cancer patients.注册针灸临床试验中纳入癌症患者的特征。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):10461-10470. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07331-9. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
An overview of primary registries of WHO's international clinical trial registry platform.世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台主要注册机构概述。
Ayu. 2019 Jul-Sep;40(3):141-146. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_62_20. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
6
Quality assessment of clinical trial registration with traditional Chinese medicine in WHO registries.世界卫生组织注册机构中中医药临床试验注册的质量评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025218.
7
Kidney function and specific mortality in 60-80 years old post-myocardial infarction patients: A 10-year follow-up study.60至80岁心肌梗死后患者的肾功能与特定死亡率:一项10年随访研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171868. eCollection 2017.
8
Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013.全球临床试验注册趋势:对2004年至2013年世界不同地区注册临床试验数量的分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 25;5(9):e008932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008932.
9
The quality of registration of clinical trials: still a problem.临床试验注册的质量:仍然是一个问题。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e84727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084727. eCollection 2014.
10
Fraud in scientific research - birth of the Concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom.科研诚信中的欺诈行为——英国制定《科研诚信协议》
J R Soc Med. 2014 Feb;107(2):61-5. doi: 10.1177/0141076813511452. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective registration of clinical trials in India: strategies, achievements & challenges.印度临床试验的前瞻性注册:策略、成就与挑战。
J Evid Based Med. 2009 Feb;2(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01015.x.
2
New law may be having some effect on publication bias.新法律可能正在对发表偏倚产生一些影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 3;102(5):290-2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq051. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
3
A call for more transparency of registered clinical trials on endometriosis.呼吁提高子宫内膜异位症注册临床试验的透明度。
Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1247-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep045. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
4
Industry-sponsored ghostwriting in clinical trial reporting: a case study.临床试验报告中行业资助的代笔行为:一项案例研究。
Account Res. 2008 Jul-Sep;15(3):152-67. doi: 10.1080/08989620802194384.
5
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.关于研究发表偏倚和结果报告偏倚实证证据的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
6
Reducing publication bias of prospective clinical trials through trial registration.通过试验注册减少前瞻性临床试验的发表偏倚。
Contraception. 2007 Nov;76(5):339-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.013.
7
Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead.临床试验注册:回顾与展望。
N Z Med J. 2007 Jun 15;120(1256):U2586.
8
Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, part IV: applying a revised CONSORT checklist to measure reporting quality.提高中医药随机对照试验的质量,第四部分:应用修订后的CONSORT清单衡量报告质量。
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2006 May;4(3):233-42. doi: 10.3736/jcim20060303.
9
Trial registration report card.试验注册报告卡。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2809-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058279.
10
Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005.2005年5月至10月期间在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行试验注册。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2779-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa053234.