School of Public Health and Psychological Studies, AUT University, Private Bag 92 006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):283-93. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq025. Epub 2010 May 27.
Refine instrument for auditing hospital-based child abuse and neglect violence intervention programmes prior to field-testing.
A modified Delphi study to identify and rate items and domains indicative of an effective and quality child abuse and neglect intervention programme. Experts participated in four Delphi rounds: two surveys, a one-day workshop and the opportunity to comment on the penultimate instrument.
New Zealand.
Twenty-four experts in the field of care and protection of children.
Items with panel agreement >or=85% and mean importance rating >or=4.0 (scale from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important)).
There was high-level consensus on items across Rounds 1 and 2 (89% and 85%, respectively). In Round 3 an additional domain (safety and security) was agreed upon and cultural issues, alert systems for children at risk, and collaboration among primary care, community, non-government and government agencies were discussed. The final instrument included nine domains ('policies and procedures', 'safety and security', 'collaboration', 'cultural environment', 'training of providers', 'intervention services', 'documentation' 'evaluation' and 'physical environment') and 64 items.
The refined instrument represents the hallmarks of an ideal child abuse and neglect programme given current knowledge and experience. The instrument enables rigorous evaluations of hospital-based child abuse and neglect intervention programmes for quality improvement and benchmarking with other programmes.
在现场测试之前,完善用于审核医院儿童虐待和忽视暴力干预项目的工具。
一项改良的德尔菲研究,旨在确定和评估与有效的、高质量的儿童虐待和忽视干预项目相关的项目和领域,并对其进行评分。专家们参与了四轮德尔菲研究:两轮调查、为期一天的研讨会,以及对倒数第二轮工具发表意见的机会。
新西兰。
24 名儿童保健和保护领域的专家。
专家小组一致同意的项目>85%,平均重要性评分>4.0(评分范围为 1(不重要)至 5(非常重要))。
在第 1 轮和第 2 轮中,项目得到了高度一致的共识(分别为 89%和 85%)。在第 3 轮中,又达成了一个额外的领域(安全和保障),并讨论了文化问题、儿童风险预警系统,以及初级保健、社区、非政府和政府机构之间的合作。最终的工具包括九个领域(“政策和程序”、“安全和保障”、“合作”、“文化环境”、“提供者培训”、“干预服务”、“文件记录”、“评估”和“物理环境”)和 64 个项目。
该改良工具代表了当前知识和经验背景下理想的儿童虐待和忽视项目的特点。该工具可用于严格评估医院的儿童虐待和忽视干预项目,以进行质量改进,并与其他项目进行基准比较。