Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 1;52(4):1704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.057. Epub 2010 May 25.
The modern socio-political climate is defined by conflict between ethnic, religious and political groups: Bosnians and Serbs, Tamils and Singhalese, Irish Catholics and Protestants, Israelis and Arabs. One impediment to the resolution of these conflicts is the psychological bias that members of each group harbor towards each other. These biases, and their neural bases, are likely different from the commonly studied biases towards racial outgroups. We presented Arab, Israeli and control individuals with statements about the Middle East from the perspective of the ingroup or the outgroup. Subjects rated how 'reasonable' each statement was, during fMRI imaging. Increased activation in the precuneus (PC) while reading pro-outgroup vs. pro-ingroup statements correlated strongly with both explicit and implicit measures of negative attitudes towards the outgroup; other brain regions that were involved in reasoning about emotionally-laden information did not show this pattern.
现代社会政治氛围的特点是民族、宗教和政治群体之间的冲突:波斯尼亚人和塞尔维亚人、泰米尔人和僧伽罗人、爱尔兰天主教徒和新教徒、以色列人和阿拉伯人。这些冲突难以解决的一个障碍是每个群体成员对彼此持有的心理偏见。这些偏见及其神经基础可能与通常研究的对种族外群体的偏见不同。我们向阿拉伯人、以色列人和对照组个体呈现了从内群体或外群体角度出发的关于中东的陈述。在 fMRI 成像期间,个体对每个陈述的“合理性”进行评分。在阅读支持外群体而非内群体的陈述时,后扣带回(PC)的激活增加,这与对外群体的明确和隐含的消极态度的测量密切相关;而参与情绪化信息推理的其他大脑区域则没有表现出这种模式。