• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《国际助听器效果问卷(IOI-HA)的法语改编与验证》

French Adaptation and Validation of the International Outcome Inventory on Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) Questionnaire.

作者信息

Tuset Maria-Pia, Daval Mary, Levy Daniel, Ayache Denis, Gargula Stéphane

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, 29 rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France.

出版信息

Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 6;15(4):97. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040097.

DOI:10.3390/audiolres15040097
PMID:40863023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12382775/
Abstract

Hearing rehabilitation using hearing aids keeps increasing in the general population. Patient-related outcome measures are essential to evaluate benefits. Although the IOI-HA is routinely used in France, its translated version from 2002 has never been validated. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the French version of the IOI-HA questionnaire. Controlled, prospective, monocentric study performed between February 2024 and January 2025. The forward-backward technique was used for translation of the questionnaire. 100 patients fitted with hearing aids completed the questionnaire. Thirty-five patients were retested 15 days after first completion. Internal consistency, assessed by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.863. Mean IOI-HA item scores ranged from 3.3 to 4.57. All seven items had a high degree of consistency with the total score, except for item Q1 which had a moderate score (0.45). Cronbach's alpha after item deletion confirmed internal consistency. Intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.622 (Q7) to 0.767 (Q5) and were all statistically significant ( < 0.001), revealing high reliability over time. No significant correlation was found between item scores and age, unilateral or bilateral hearing aid use or accompanying symptoms (tinnitus, dizziness). The French translation of the IOI-HA questionnaire, published in 2002, is a valid and reliable questionnaire evaluating hearing aid satisfaction. This validated questionnaire can now be used in daily clinical practice.

摘要

在普通人群中,使用助听器进行听力康复的情况不断增加。与患者相关的结果指标对于评估益处至关重要。尽管IOI-HA在法国被常规使用,但其2002年的翻译版本从未经过验证。本研究旨在评估IOI-HA问卷法语版的心理测量特性。于2024年2月至2025年1月进行了对照、前瞻性、单中心研究。采用前后翻译技术对问卷进行翻译。100名佩戴助听器的患者完成了问卷。35名患者在首次完成问卷15天后进行了重新测试。通过Cronbach's alpha评估的内部一致性为0.863。IOI-HA各项目平均得分在3.3至4.57之间。除项目Q1得分为中等(0.45)外,所有七个项目与总分的一致性都很高。删除项目后的Cronbach's alpha证实了内部一致性。组内相关系数在0.622(Q7)至0.767(Q5)之间,均具有统计学意义(<0.001),表明随时间推移具有高度可靠性。项目得分与年龄、单侧或双侧使用助听器或伴随症状(耳鸣、头晕)之间未发现显著相关性。2002年发布的IOI-HA问卷法语版是一份有效且可靠的评估助听器满意度的问卷。这份经过验证的问卷现在可用于日常临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e88/12382775/38d9ee3e14c7/audiolres-15-00097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e88/12382775/abaf1fcea9c6/audiolres-15-00097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e88/12382775/51e8ffd3a484/audiolres-15-00097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e88/12382775/38d9ee3e14c7/audiolres-15-00097-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e88/12382775/abaf1fcea9c6/audiolres-15-00097-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e88/12382775/51e8ffd3a484/audiolres-15-00097-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e88/12382775/38d9ee3e14c7/audiolres-15-00097-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
French Adaptation and Validation of the International Outcome Inventory on Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) Questionnaire.《国际助听器效果问卷(IOI-HA)的法语改编与验证》
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 6;15(4):97. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040097.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.银杏叶治疗耳鸣。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 16;11(11):CD013514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013514.pub2.
4
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub3.
6
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.改善成人听觉康复中助听器使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 12(7):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub2.
7
Translation and Psychometric Validation of Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: The Urdu Version for Facilitating Multidisciplinary Research in Pakistan.《简短疾病认知问卷的翻译与心理测量学验证:用于促进巴基斯坦多学科研究的乌尔都语版本》
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 20;18:5075-5088. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S536636. eCollection 2025.
8
Bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids for bilateral hearing impairment in adults.成人双侧听力障碍使用双侧助听器与单侧助听器的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):CD012665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012665.pub2.
9
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
10
Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.使用通用和特定疾病健康相关生活质量测量指标进行 NICE 决策制定:系统评价、统计建模和调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(9):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta18090.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, and national prevalence of hearing loss from 1990 to 2019: A trend and health inequality analyses based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990年至2019年全球、区域和国家听力损失患病率:基于《2019年全球疾病负担研究》的趋势与健康不平等分析
Ageing Res Rev. 2023 Dec;92:102124. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102124. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Hearing Loss Prevalence, Years Lived With Disability, and Hearing Aid Use in the United States From 1990 to 2019: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study.1990 年至 2019 年美国听力损失的患病率、残疾年数和助听器使用率:来自全球疾病负担研究的结果。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(1):257-267. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001420. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aid Use Among Adults in France in the CONSTANCES Study.
法国 CONSTANCES 研究中成年人听力损失和助听器使用的流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217633. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17633.
4
Hearing Aid Effects and Satisfaction in Patients with Tinnitus.耳鸣患者的助听器效果与满意度
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 18;11(4):1096. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041096.
5
COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures.CONSORT 报告规范:用于评估患者报告结局测量工具测量属性的研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2197-2218. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Psychometric properties of the Kannada version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).《国际助听器结局量表(IOI-HA)卡纳达语版的心理测量学特性》。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):1039-1045. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1884910. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
Quality of life and social determinants in individual hearing AIDS users.个体助听器使用者的生活质量和社会决定因素
Codas. 2019 Apr 1;31(2):e20170287. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017287.
8
The World Health Organization's hearing-impairment grading system: an evaluation for unaided communication in age-related hearing loss.世界卫生组织的听力障碍分级系统:年龄相关性听力损失中非助听听阈评估。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jan;58(1):12-20. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1518598. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).国际助听器成效量表(IOI-HA)丹麦语修订译本的心理测量特性。
Int J Audiol. 2014 May;53(5):302-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.874049. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
10
Assessing binaural hearing: results using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.评估双耳听力:使用言语、空间和听力质量量表的结果。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Oct;21(9):568-74. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.2.