• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童曼彻斯特分诊系统的可重复性。

Repeatability of the Manchester Triage System for children.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CB Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2010 Jul;27(7):512-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.077750. Epub 2010 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2009.077750
PMID:20515904
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to assess the repeatability of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) in children.

METHODS

All emergency department nurses (n=43) from a general teaching hospital and a university children's hospital in The Netherlands triaged 20 written case scenarios using the Manchester Triage system. Second, at two emergency departments (EDs), real-life simultaneous triage of patients (<16 years) was performed by ED nurses and two research nurses. The written case scenarios and the patients included in the real-life simultaneous triage study were representative of children attending the ED, in age, problem and urgency level. The authors assessed inter-rater agreement using quadratic weighted kappa values.

RESULTS

The weighted kappa between the nurses, triaging the case scenarios, was 0.83 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91). In total, 88% (N=198) of the eligible ED patients were triaged simultaneously, with a weighted kappa of 0.65 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTS showed good to very good repeatability in paediatric emergency care.

摘要

目的

作者旨在评估曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)在儿童中的可重复性。

方法

荷兰一家综合教学医院和一家大学儿童医院的所有急诊护士(n=43)使用曼彻斯特分诊系统对 20 个书面病例情景进行分诊。其次,在两个急诊科(ED),ED 护士和两名研究护士同时对患者(<16 岁)进行真实的同时分诊。书面病例情景和真实同时分诊研究中纳入的患者在年龄、问题和紧急程度方面代表了到 ED 就诊的儿童。作者使用二次加权 Kappa 值评估了评分者间的一致性。

结果

对病例情景进行分诊的护士之间的加权 Kappa 值为 0.83(95%CI 0.74 至 0.91)。共有 88%(N=198)符合条件的 ED 患者同时进行了分诊,加权 Kappa 值为 0.65(95%CI 0.56 至 0.72)。

结论

MTS 在儿科急诊护理中具有良好到非常好的可重复性。

相似文献

1
Repeatability of the Manchester Triage System for children.儿童曼彻斯特分诊系统的可重复性。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Jul;27(7):512-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.077750. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
2
Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.荷兰综合急诊科患者群体中曼彻斯特分诊系统的可靠性和有效性:一项模拟研究的结果
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):431-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.055228.
3
Observer agreement of the Manchester Triage System and the Emergency Severity Index: a simulation study.曼彻斯特分诊系统与急诊严重程度指数的观察者一致性:一项模拟研究。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Aug;26(8):556-60. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059378.
4
The Manchester Triage System provides good reliability in an Australian emergency department.曼彻斯特分诊系统在澳大利亚的一个急诊科中具备良好的可靠性。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Jul;26(7):484-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.065508.
5
The Manchester triage system: improvements for paediatric emergency care.曼彻斯特分诊系统:改进儿科急诊护理。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Aug;29(8):654-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200562. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
6
The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation.加拿大儿童分诊与 acuity 量表:一项前瞻性多中心评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):71-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
7
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.儿科患者中急诊严重程度指数(第3版)分诊算法的评估
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;12(3):219-24. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.09.023.
8
Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.三级护理中心护士对加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表的评分者间一致性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale”,意为“ acuity 量表”,这里按推测翻译。)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
9
Can urgency classification of the Manchester triage system predict serious bacterial infections in febrile children?曼彻斯特分诊系统的紧急程度分类能否预测发热儿童的严重细菌感染?
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Aug;96(8):715-22. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.207845. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
10
Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the emergency department.比较一种非结构化的分诊系统、紧急严重指数和曼彻斯特分诊系统,以区分急诊科患者的优先顺序。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):822-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01122.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric emergency triage systems.儿科急诊分诊系统。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022 Jul 15;41:e2021038. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2021038. eCollection 2022.
2
Are Pediatric Triage Systems Reliable in the Emergency Department?儿科分诊系统在急诊科是否可靠?
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Jul 10;2020:9825730. doi: 10.1155/2020/9825730. eCollection 2020.
3
Electronic and manual registration of Manchester System: reliability, accuracy, and time evaluation.曼彻斯特系统的电子与手动记录:可靠性、准确性及时间评估
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Dec 5;27:e3241. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3170.3241. eCollection 2019.
4
Performance of the Manchester triage system in older emergency department patients: a retrospective cohort study.曼彻斯特分诊系统在老年急诊科患者中的表现:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0217-y.
5
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A NEW TRIAGE SYSTEM FOR PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE: CLARIPED.一种用于儿科急诊护理的新分诊系统CLARIPED的有效性和可靠性
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018 Oct-Dec;36(4):398-406. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;4;00017.
6
Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department.急诊科不同儿科分诊系统的验证
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(3):223-227. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.03.010.
7
Inter-rater reliability between nurses for a new paediatric triage system based primarily on vital parameters: the Paediatric Triage Instrument (PETI).一种主要基于生命体征参数的新型儿科分诊系统——儿科分诊工具(PETI)在护士之间的评分者间信度。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 23;7(2):e012748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012748.
8
A reliability study of the rapid emergency triage and treatment system for children.儿童快速急诊分诊与治疗系统的可靠性研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Feb 24;24:19. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0207-6.
9
Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care.儿科急诊分诊系统的可靠性和有效性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Aug 27;17:38. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-38.