Ministry of Health, Warsaw, Poland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 7;10:153. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-153.
There has been an increase in 'risk sharing' schemes for pharmaceuticals between healthcare institutions and pharmaceutical companies in Europe in recent years as an additional approach to provide continued comprehensive and equitable healthcare. There is though confusion surrounding the terminology as well as concerns with existing schemes.
A literature review was undertaken to identify existing schemes supplemented with additional internal documents or web-based references known to the authors. This was combined with the extensive knowledge of health authority personnel from 14 different countries and locations involved with these schemes.
A large number of 'risk sharing' schemes with pharmaceuticals are in existence incorporating both financial-based models and performance-based/outcomes-based models. In view of this, a new logical definition is proposed. This is "risk sharing' schemes should be considered as agreements concluded by payers and pharmaceutical companies to diminish the impact on payers' budgets for new and existing schemes brought about by uncertainty and/or the need to work within finite budgets". There are a number of concerns with existing schemes. These include potentially high administration costs, lack of transparency, conflicts of interest, and whether health authorities will end up funding an appreciable proportion of a new drug's development costs. In addition, there is a paucity of published evaluations of existing schemes with pharmaceuticals.
We believe there are only a limited number of situations where 'risk sharing' schemes should be considered as well as factors that should be considered by payers in advance of implementation. This includes their objective, appropriateness, the availability of competent staff to fully evaluate proposed schemes as well as access to IT support. This also includes whether systematic evaluations have been built into proposed schemes.
近年来,欧洲医疗机构与制药公司之间增加了药品“风险共担”计划,作为提供持续全面和公平医疗保健的另一种方法。然而,术语的使用存在混淆,对现有计划也存在担忧。
我们进行了文献回顾,以确定现有的计划,并辅以作者已知的其他内部文件或基于网络的参考资料。这与来自 14 个不同国家和地区的卫生当局人员的广泛知识相结合,这些人员参与了这些计划。
存在大量药品“风险共担”计划,包括基于财务的模型和基于绩效/结果的模型。有鉴于此,我们提出了一个新的逻辑定义。这一定义为:“风险共担”计划应被视为付款人和制药公司之间达成的协议,以减轻新计划和现有计划给付款人预算带来的不确定性和/或在有限预算内工作的影响。现有计划存在一些问题。这些问题包括潜在的高管理成本、缺乏透明度、利益冲突,以及卫生当局最终是否会为新药开发成本的相当一部分提供资金。此外,关于现有药品“风险共担”计划的评价很少。
我们认为,只有在有限的情况下才应考虑“风险共担”计划,并且付款人在实施前应考虑一些因素,包括其目标、适当性、是否有能力全面评估拟议计划的人员以及获得 IT 支持的情况。这还包括是否在拟议计划中建立了系统评价。