Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mov Disord. 2010 Jun 15;25(8):969-78. doi: 10.1002/mds.23116.
The clinical variability between patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may point at the existence of subtypes of the disease. Identification of subtypes is important, since a focus on homogeneous groups may enhance the chance of success of research on mechanisms of disease and may also lead to tailored treatment strategies. Cluster analysis (CA) is an objective method to classify patients into subtypes. We systematically reviewed the methodology and results of CA studies in PD to gain a better understanding of the robustness of identified subtypes. We found seven studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Studies were limited by incomplete reporting and methodological limitations. Differences between studies rendered comparisons of the results difficult. However, it appeared that studies which applied a comparable design identified similar subtypes. The cluster profiles "old age-at-onset and rapid disease progression" and "young age-at-onset and slow disease progression" emerged from the majority of studies. Other cluster profiles were less consistent across studies. Future studies with a rigorous study design that is standardized with respect to the included variables, data processing, and CA technique may advance the knowledge on subtypes in PD.
帕金森病(PD)患者之间的临床表现差异可能表明该疾病存在亚型。识别亚型很重要,因为关注同质群体可能会增加对疾病机制研究成功的机会,也可能导致量身定制的治疗策略。聚类分析(CA)是一种将患者分为亚组的客观方法。我们系统地回顾了 PD 中 CA 研究的方法学和结果,以更好地了解所确定的亚组的稳健性。我们发现了七项符合纳入标准的研究。这些研究受到不完全报告和方法学限制的限制。研究之间的差异使得比较结果变得困难。然而,似乎应用类似设计的研究确定了相似的亚型。大多数研究中出现了“发病年龄较大且疾病进展迅速”和“发病年龄较小且疾病进展缓慢”的聚类特征。其他聚类特征在研究之间不太一致。未来的研究需要严格的研究设计,该设计在包含的变量、数据处理和 CA 技术方面标准化,这可能会提高对 PD 亚型的认识。