Institute of Sport & Exercise Science, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Psychophysiology. 2011 Jan;48(1):136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01034.x.
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the concurrent use of Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and a new Perceived Readiness (PR) scale facilitates optimal interval training performance outcomes. Eleven competitive male runners completed outdoor interval track-running trials at a pre-set RPE. The PR scale was used to facilitate self-determined recovery, while minimum heart rate (HR) and work to rest ratio (WR) strategies were used as comparative conditions. Duplicate PR trial performances were similar but intercondition comparisons identified that the HR trial was significantly slower than both WR and PR conditions. There was no difference in performance between WR and PR, but recoveries for both PR trials were significantly shorter than for WR. Since the aim of interval training is to sustain performance with the shortest possible recovery time, the concurrent use of RPE and PR scales appears to be a useful psychophysiological technique to self- determine both work and rest in interval training.
本研究旨在探讨同时使用主观疲劳感知评估（RPE）和新的准备感知（PR）量表是否有助于获得最佳的间歇训练效果。11 名有竞争力的男性跑步运动员在预先设定的 RPE 下完成了户外间歇跑道跑步试验。PR 量表用于促进自我决定的恢复，而最小心率（HR）和工作与休息比（WR）策略则作为比较条件。重复的 PR 试验表现相似，但条件间比较表明，HR 试验明显慢于 WR 和 PR 条件。WR 和 PR 之间的表现没有差异，但 PR 试验的恢复时间明显短于 WR。由于间歇训练的目的是在尽可能短的恢复时间内保持表现，因此同时使用 RPE 和 PR 量表似乎是一种有用的心理生理技术，可以自我确定间歇训练中的工作和休息时间。
