College of Nursing-Lincoln Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE 68588-0220, USA.
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):273-83. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cfbb6c.
The aim of this small-scale study was to explore the use of cluster analysis to identify subgroups of heart failure patients whose patterns of symptoms may help guide clinical management. The empirically derived clusters were compared on (1) demographics, (2) clinical characteristics, and (3) subscales of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.
A demographics questionnaire, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, and the investigator-developed Heart Failure Symptom Survey were mailed to a random sample of 300 patients at a Midwestern outpatient heart failure clinic.
Of 139 respondents, 33 (24%) were female and 106 (76%) were male. The mean (SD) age was 70.6 (9.7) years, and all were white, except for a single African American female. Most subjects were married (84%) with a median level of high school education, and 5% were New York Heart Association classification I, 38% class II, 52% class III, and 5% class IV. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to derive a 3-cluster solution based on the presence or absence of 14 symptoms. Cluster 1 patients had significantly lower incidence of symptoms and were more likely to be New York Heart Association class I or class II, with lower body mass index and higher education levels compared with patients in the other clusters. Both clusters 2 and 3 were more symptomatic than cluster 1. Compared with cluster 3, patients in cluster 2 reported more shortness of breath under circumstances other than activity, and the majority reported difficulty sleeping. They also tended to report greater symptom severity and impact on physical activity and enjoyment of life. Additional differences included comorbidities and percentage of subjects on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Examination of the clusters suggested clinical implications related to pharmacological management and raised questions concerning potential influences of duration of the heart failure condition, presence of sleep-disordered breathing, and impact of educational level on self-management behavior and symptom patterns.
本小规模研究旨在探讨使用聚类分析来识别心力衰竭患者亚组,这些亚组的症状模式可能有助于指导临床管理。对经验衍生的聚类在以下方面进行了比较:(1)人口统计学特征,(2)临床特征,和(3)堪萨斯城心肌病问卷的亚量表。
向中西部门诊心力衰竭诊所的随机样本患者邮寄了一份人口统计学问卷、堪萨斯城心肌病问卷和研究者开发的心力衰竭症状调查。
在 139 名应答者中,33 名(24%)为女性,106 名(76%)为男性。平均(SD)年龄为 70.6(9.7)岁,除了一名单一的非裔美国女性,所有患者均为白人。大多数患者已婚(84%),具有中学教育程度中位数,5%为纽约心脏协会分级 I,38%为 II 级,52%为 III 级,5%为 IV 级。基于 14 种症状的有无,使用分层聚类分析得出了 3 个聚类解决方案。聚类 1 患者的症状发生率明显较低,更可能为纽约心脏协会 I 级或 II 级,与其他聚类的患者相比,体重指数较低,教育程度较高。聚类 2 和 3 都比聚类 1 更有症状。与聚类 3 相比,聚类 2 患者在活动以外的情况下呼吸急促的情况更多,大多数患者报告睡眠困难。他们也倾向于报告更严重的症状和对身体活动和生活享受的影响。其他差异包括合并症和使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的患者比例。对聚类的检查表明与药物治疗管理有关的临床意义,并提出了有关心力衰竭状况持续时间、睡眠呼吸障碍的存在以及教育水平对自我管理行为和症状模式的潜在影响的问题。