Suppr超能文献

区分语音规则概率和近邻密度对词汇理解和产生的影响:对有和没有语音延迟的学龄前儿童进行比较。

Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences & Disorders, University of Kansas, 3001 Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045-7555, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Aug;53(4):933-49. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0075). Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To differentiate the effect of phonotactic probability from that of neighborhood density on a vocabulary probe administered to preschool children with or without phonological delays.

METHOD

Twenty preschool children with functional phonological delays and 34 preschool children with typical language development completed a 121-item vocabulary probe in both an expressive and receptive response format. Words on the vocabulary probe orthogonally varied on phonotactic probability and neighborhood density but were matched on age of acquisition, word frequency, word length, semantic set size, concreteness, familiarity, and imagability.

RESULTS

Results show a Phonotactic Probability x Neighborhood Density interaction with variation across groups. Specifically, the optimal conditions for typically developing children were rare phonotactic probability with sparse neighborhoods and common phonotactic probability with dense neighborhoods. In contrast, only rare phonotactic probability with sparse neighborhoods was optimal for children with phonological delays.

CONCLUSIONS

Rare sound sequences and sparse neighborhoods may facilitate triggering of word learning for typically developing children and children with phonological delays. In contrast, common sound sequences and dense neighborhoods may facilitate configuration and engagement for typically developing children but not for children with phonological delays because of their weaker phonological and/or lexical representations.

摘要

目的

区分语音规则概率和邻域密度对有或无语音延迟的学龄前儿童词汇探针的影响。

方法

20 名有功能性语音延迟的学龄前儿童和 34 名有典型语言发展的学龄前儿童在表达和接受反应格式下完成了 121 项词汇探针。词汇探针上的单词在语音规则概率和邻域密度上正交变化,但在习得年龄、词频、词长、语义集大小、具体性、熟悉度和可想象性上匹配。

结果

结果显示,在不同组别之间存在语音规则概率 x 邻域密度的交互作用。具体来说,对于正常发育的儿童来说,最佳条件是罕见的语音规则概率和稀疏的邻域,以及常见的语音规则概率和密集的邻域。相比之下,只有罕见的语音规则概率和稀疏的邻域对有语音延迟的儿童是最佳的。

结论

罕见的声音序列和稀疏的邻域可能有助于触发正常发育的儿童和有语音延迟的儿童的词汇学习。相比之下,常见的声音序列和密集的邻域可能有助于正常发育的儿童进行配置和参与,但对有语音延迟的儿童则不行,因为他们的语音和/或词汇表征较弱。

相似文献

2
Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
J Commun Disord. 2010 Mar-Apr;43(2):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
3
Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Mar-Apr;48(2):188-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00198.x. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
4
The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Oct;47(5):1194-212. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/088).
6
Lexical and phonological effects in early word production.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):596-608. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0113). Epub 2011 Dec 29.
7
I remembered the chorm! Word learning abilities of children with and without phonological impairment.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):913-931. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12967. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
8
Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: the effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density.
J Child Lang. 2014 Nov;41(6):1224-48. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000445. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
LexFindR: A fast, simple, and extensible R package for finding similar words in a lexicon.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1388-1402. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01667-6. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
Not All Procedural Learning Tasks Are Difficult for Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Mar 17;64(3):922-934. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00548. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
The Relation Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Phonological Awareness in Children With Cochlear Implants.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2386-2402. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00259. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
Comparing Word Characteristic Effects on Vocabulary of Children with Cochlear Implants.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2019 Oct 1;24(4):424-434. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz015.
5
The Influence of Misarticulations on Children's Word Identification and Processing.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Apr 17;61(4):820-836. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0379.
6
Grammar in Boys With Idiopathic Autism Spectrum Disorder and Boys With Fragile X Syndrome Plus Autism Spectrum Disorder.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Apr 17;61(4):857-869. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0248.
8
Orthography and Modality Influence Speech Production in Adults and Children.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Dec 1;59(6):1421-1435. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0242.
9
Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children.
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Nov;37(4):280-290. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587704. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
10
Phonetic complexity of words immediately following utterance-initial productions in children who stutter.
J Fluency Disord. 2016 Mar;47:56-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Phonological Knowledge in Typical and Atypical Speech-Sound Development.
Top Lang Disord. 2005 Jul;25(3):190-206. doi: 10.1097/00011363-200507000-00003.
2
Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants.
J Child Lang. 2009 Mar;36(2):291-321. doi: 10.1017/S030500090800891X. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
3
Lexical representations in children with SLI: evidence from a frequency-manipulated gating task.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr;51(2):381-93. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/028).
4
Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: when adults learn new words.
Cogn Psychol. 2007 Dec;55(4):306-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
5
Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175-92. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085).
7
Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2006 May;17(5):331-49. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.5.4.
10
Life span effects of lexical factors on oral naming.
Lang Speech. 2005;48(Pt 2):123-56. doi: 10.1177/00238309050480020101.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验